Methodism and the War In Iraq
Methodism and the War In Iraq
By Lloyd C. Leemis
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
A
funny thing happened on the road to Baghdad. It seems that
while Methodist bishops
were meeting in North Carolina to adopt a resolution calling for an end to what
they proclaimed to be an "unjust war" in Iraq, a group of Iraqi Kurds were
taking out advertisements in the
Wall Street Journal thanking America for rescuing them from the tyrrany
of Saddam Hussein. Sounds funny,
doesn't it? It gets funnier.
The
96 Methodist bishops whs signed this so-called "statement of conscience" also
called for the President to set a timetable for the withdrawal of troops. But in Iraq, wounded soldiers were
protesting their scheduled evacuation because they wanted to stay in Iraq until the job was done!
Now
get this. The bishops also wanted to get the United Nations to appoint an envoy
to encourage peace talks.
This is the same U. N. that failed and refused to do anything
constructive to avoid the war in the first place despite pleas from the United
States. I wonder with whom they
expect the envoy to negotiate. The
al-Qaida who have no compunction about beheading any American they can get
their hands on?
Let
me stop right here and point out out a few things to these bishops. Every military authority I have heard of states emphatically
that one must not set a timetable for troop withdrawal. It tells the enemy just
how long it must hang on and how much preparation it must make to take over the
country when the withdrawal takes place.
Should we give any credence to these bishops, or should we listen to the
words of someone who lives in that region where years ago Saddam Hussein gassed
approximately 5,000 of his subjects, mostly women and children (yes, using
WMD)? That person is Bayan Sami
Abdul Rahman, Iraqi Kurdistan's representative to the United Kingdom, who
states: "If people are saying that America should withdraw their troops now,
that would be a catastrophe, not only for the people of Iraq but also for the
Middle East and the wider international community and the United States".
As
for "negotiating the peace", I
recall when that took place once before. Neville Chamberlin went to negotiate
"peace for our time" with Adolph Hitler.
As a consequence, World War II took place at a cost of 60 million lives
or more. If the Allies had
undertaken a pre-emptive strike the moment Hitler moved into Poland, most of
those lives would have been saved.
The
justification for the bishops' statement, they say, is that Jesus was a man of peace. Of course He was.
He stated "blessed are the peacemakers" didn't He? But keep that remark
in context. Jesus was also a realist and declared there would be "wars and
rumors of wars until I return".
Wars are, unfortunately, a reality of the time in which we live. Calling a just war "unjust" is choosing
the wrong side of this conflict.
I might add that the scriptures are
full of instances where God used military action to defeat the forces of evil
that threatened his people. Who
can say that this may not be the case in our time? The scriptures also say
there is a time for war and a time for peace. Now just happens to be a time for
war and we had better win it.
Make
no mistake, our enemies listen to our news and judge their actions
accordingly. If they believe that
we are divided or lack the will to win, our troops will be placed in
jeopardy. Don't tell me you
support our troops, bishops, when you are undermining the effort to win. Do you suppose our enemies might just
get encouragement from your words broadcast to the whole world?
And
who am I to criticize these Methodist luminaries? Well, I have been a Methodist for nearly 70 years and have
held practically every job a church offers: Sunday School teacher, choir
singer, youth leader, trustee, chairman of the Administrative Board and a
delegate to the Annual Conference.
I know Methodism and my fellow Methodists as well as do these church
politicians. The bishops'
declarations do not express the sentiments of the
average
Methodist in the pew. The bishops
exhort us to "listen to our leaders", but some of these are the leaders whose
policies are producing a steady erosion of membership due to their liberal
theology and their politicizing of our denomination. No, bishops, you should be listening to your members.
Major
General Vernon Chong, USAF ret., says "Our country is now facing the most
serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your
lifetime and mine (which includes WWII)."
We had better not lose this one or we will become irrelevant to world
affairs.
John
Stuart Mill had it right when he said:"War is an ugly thing, but not the
ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic
feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse."
|