Wake up America: before it’s too late!
Obama begins his attack – The gullible minions continue drinking the Kool-Aid
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
As Americans inch ever closer to November and the single most important presidential election quite possibly since Abraham Lincoln – one which shall once again (hopefully) right this nation’s ship in so very many ways – Barack Hussein Obama has of late begun spinning his yarn, attempting to smear the man who appears to be the Republican Party’s viable candidate. So blind to Obama’s ways are his minions – these lemmings to include the “main-stream-media” – that these unfortunate folks continue their refusal to vet their anointed one.
From the moment that Obama – one of the most Statist Democrats since Woodrow Wilson – dared to utter Lincoln’s name or incorporate that great Republican’s works (as Obama so arrogantly did during his inauguration) even the most clueless of the Obama-trons should have noticed SOMETHING was amiss. After all, slavery during Lincoln’s days was a platform of the Democrats, was it not?
Obama the new Lincoln?
Today, the latest by Obama is no less convoluted on its surface, yet every bit as corrupted to its core. Let’s begin with these notions of Obama comparing himself to Lincoln while denigrating Republicans and stirring up racial tensions in America. By now, unless one has reverted to living without contact to the outside world, everyone is aware of the Trayvon Martin case. This lightning rod of a case has done more to expose the despicable underbelly of the “main-stream-media” than most cases to date. Yet what it has also secured for those paying attention is an undeniable proof of Obama’s cold, calculated and self-serving nature.
Paramount in this case we have two facts as they pertain to politics. First, this is a State’s issue. Second, this issue requires the work of the Judiciary. In neither of these two instances should the office of the President be involved. Yet Obama has taken it upon himself to gin up the media, the Black Panthers, radical Black leaders such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and others in the Black community – all with his insistence that “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon…it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this…” And lest anyone posit that Obama’s comments lacked racial undertones, please explain another recent announcement by Obama: his declaration that he was launching “African Americans for Obama”.
Now before folks rush to judgment, boastfully declaring that the top 3 Republican candidates for president also support the investigation underway in the Trayvon case, let’s establish a few facts. First, these men are running for office; they are not IN office. Once one is the President, certain protocols are thereby in place. Running for the office of the President and actually being the President are two different things. Second, and this one’s even more important: not one of these 3 men running for office has inferred, implied or – as is the case with Obama, explicitly inserted – race in this issue.
Coming full circle now – back to the issue of Obama comparing himself to Lincoln while verbally persecuting Republicans – let us attempt to make sense of this. Imagine for a moment if Lincoln had behaved in the same manner as Obama is today. After all, Obama claims time and again that he’s persecuted as bad as Lincoln was – that was actually one of the most ridiculous things Obama has ever mustered the audacity to claim. Imagine if Lincoln had called for Whites across America to form the Anglo-Americans for Lincoln campaign (for that matter, imagine if Romney formed such a coalition). Imagine if back in Lincoln’s day a young White man had been killed in the South and Lincoln had called for that era’s Whites to fully investigate, basing his cries for justice on the claim that the victim “looks like what my boy would have looked like were I to have had a son.”
Do any of us think for a moment that the Jim Crow laws of yesterday – rightfully overturned by God fearing, compassionate, Conservative Republican members of our community (such as Martin Luther King, Jr.) – would have stood a chance of repeal? In fact, if Lincoln had been the original Obama, it’s fairly safe to state that there wouldn’t BE an Obama – in the sense of the first Black President of the United States. It’s time that Obama take a look around and stop ginning up the race wars that his hero worked so diligently to overturn – or at least stop verbally slapping the representatives of Lincoln’s Party.
The never ending “Entitlement” Party
In addition to these confounding race baiting issues, Obama has turned to attacking Republicans on the issue of so called “entitlements”. Recalling the Founding, and throughout this nation’s history until the unfortunate installment of Statists the likes of Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson and now Obama, this has always been a nation based on self-reliance. Escaping the tyranny of King George III, the Founders established a nation based on the model known as a Representative Republic. Through this establishing, most rights and responsibilities for governing are left to the States – that is, to the individual. As a nation, we are built on the notion of personal responsibility.
Yet so determined were the Statists to render the American people dependent upon government for their very subsistence that the concept of “social security” became their mantra in the early 1930s. Yet as evidenced by the fact that even as late as 1934 (several years into the Depression) there remained no public or private outcry for “social security”, this “entitlement” program was never desired by the average American – it was a political tool for the Left. By the time Roosevelt passed his version of this sweeping legislation in 1935, in fact, public criticism remained strong – as this “entitlement” continued to be viewed as an affront to personal responsibility. Statists had prevailed in their attempts to lay the ground work for the “dependency” state, but a majority of Americans nonetheless recognized the oncoming assault.
Statist programs the likes of “social security” would appear again later. In the 1960s, Lyndon Johnson set about to establish another form of “insurance”, as he recognized the power that Democrats held over not only the mindless voters, but their Republican opponents as well thanks to “social security”. This “insurance” concept of Johnson’s – known as Medicare – would be based on “social security” and Johnson arrogantly boasted that it was the next step in Roosevelt’s dream. The epitome of an “entitlement”, Medicare was in fact a political tool, as a medical program to assist the aged poor had already been passed by Congress years earlier: the Kerr-Mills bill. By the time Johnson was finished, however, “entitlements” and the entitlement state had been so deeply ingrained in the minds of the American Left that the unraveling of same – even in the name of Americanism – promised to be the political blood bath it remains today.
So today, as Obama and his Party portray Republicans as monsters, determined to push Grandmother off the cliff while leaving autistic children to fend for themselves, the very words of Barack’s political predecessors shed light on the facts as they relate to “entitlements”. Franklin D Roosevelt (as re-quoted in the book, “Ameritopia” by Mark R. Levin), had this to say about “social security”:
“Those Social Security payroll taxes were never a problem of economics. They are political all the way through. We put those payroll taxes there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and their unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.”
Roosevelt himself, by personal admission had established this taxing scheme on every single working member of American society (including the working poor) under the guise of “paying you back some day”. By taxing every breathing member of society via their paychecks, the Statists could raise taxes without resistance for every fly-by-night program to nowhere, take money from the poor without guilt or obligation, and build a government slush fund essentially unaffected by oversight.
So free from oversight are these “entitlement” programs in fact that one report after another – from those as written by the CBO to ones published by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation as well as Richard S. Foster (see “Ameritopia” by Mark R. Levin) – declares that both “social security” and Medicare are factually unviable. For Statists to now paint Republicans as irresponsible is categorically laughable. Quite to the contrary, it is these Republicans who remain the only leaders dedicated to personal responsibility. Yet the lemmings continue to drink the Kool-aide.
Romney the “marvelous” – Must be a “rich” thing
As if the race baiting and attacks over politically established “entitlements” weren’t enough, this week Obama set out to paint his opponent (specifically Mitt Romney) as an out of touch rich man. In his speeches over the week (including one given Thursday the 5th), Obama smirked over Romney’s use of the word “marvelous” – would it have been preferable for Romney to invoke such hip rhetoric as “dope”, Obama?
In doing so – per Obama’s “main-stream-media” proponents – Obama was portraying Romney as “an out-of-touch multi-millionaire”. Interestingly, the very individuals who are so quick to judge Romney for his successes in business and life themselves benefit from salaries that would have “occupiers” storming the gates. Equally as interesting is the fact that these very same “hard-hitting” journalists seem interested only in the financial positioning of Romney vis-à-vis the “average” America. Where were they when Obama’s tax return for 2009 was released?
As a matter of public record, Obama’s tax return was published to the White House web-site early in 2010. This tax return clearly establishes Obama as a multi-millionaire, as his adjusted income for 2009 was 5.5 million dollars. What’s more, this trend continued into subsequent years, as Obama’s tax return reports nearly 2 million for 2010. And prior to 2009, Obama’s income was reported (for 2008) as being nearly 3 million. To categorize Obama as a multi-millionaire is not only fair, it’s a proven fact. And yet, each time Barack opens his mouth and lambasts Romney for the latter’s income earning prowess, where are the “hard-hitting” journalists?
This blatant hypocrisy by Obama (and his media minions) serves the same goal as every other action by the divider-in-chief: social division. Obama cannot win the upcoming election based on his record as President. He has weakened us with our allies abroad, compromised our position with Russia, bolstered our enemies in the Middle East, crippled our economy, increased spending to levels heretofore unimagined, catapulted debt to levels promising strife for generations not yet born and brought back the push for Statism not seen since Woodrow Wilson. With all of this saddling him, Obama’s sole means of success in 2012 are clear: divide and conquer.
Obama is on a course to re-establish America in terms not recognized since before the Civil War. He incites racism, elicits class struggles and defines his competitors as enemies of the common man. He performs these maneuvers while benefitting from decades of struggle, strife, war and hardship that resulted in the dismantling of Jim Crow laws. Likewise he performs his nation dividing actions while secure in his place among the elite of this nation as one of the wealthiest income earners ever to grace the Oval Office. And finally, he viciously insults his competition while demanding the removal of vitriolic rhetoric from the public square. And yet, the lemmings continue to drink the Kool-aide.
Perhaps this quote from the Czech Republic is far truer than ever before now realized:
“The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America.
Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
Wake up America: before it’s too late!