Barack Obama holds a deep, personal resentment against those Americans who have the audacity to succeed and prosper
Is Barack Obama’s Anti-white, Anti-American Bias Inherited?
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
In order to understand Barack Obama’s motivation when it comes to national defense, jobs, deficits, taxes the economy, and American culture in general, one must accept the following fact:
Barack Obama holds a deep, personal resentment against those Americans who have the audacity to succeed and prosper.
It would be wrong to blatantly accuse the president of using an anti-white bias when making economic decisions. It is mere coincidence, you see, that he always targets the so-called rich whom also just happen to be mostly Caucasian.
Nonetheless, it is important to recognize that Obama’s father was well-known as anti-white, and anti-American as reported in part:
In his three years as U.S. president, Barack Obama has been dogged by claims he is not patriotic enough.
Last year he even had to publish his birth certificate to silence doubters who suggested he was not born an American.
Now it emerges that similar fears were expressed about his father, who was categorized with others as ‘anti-American and anti-white’ when he moved to the United States in 1959.
Mr. Obama Senior had grown up in Kenya under British rule and aroused the fears of both colonial officers and American officials when he won a chance to study in Hawaii. The officials felt Kenyan students were ‘academically inferior’ with a ‘bad reputation’ for turning anti-American.
A memo from a British diplomat in Washington to Whitehall – released today by the National Archives in West London – sets out their concerns about the young Kenyans.
Dated September 1, 1959, it says: ‘I have discussed with the State Department. They are as disturbed about these developments as we are. They point out that Kenya students have a bad reputation over here for falling into the wrong hands and for becoming both anti-American and anti-white.’
In one of the Foreign Office files, the future president’s father appears on a list of Kenyan students as ‘OBAMA, Barack H’ – they shared the same name.
At the age of 23, he enrolled at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu to study economics with classmates including Ann Dunham, a 17-year-old white American from Kansas. The couple had a short marriage that led to the birth in 1961 of the future president, Barack Obama II.
Obama Senior was among 100 or so Kenyan students brought to America by the African American Students Foundation.
U.S. and British officials were deeply suspicious of this outfit, observing that the AASF – though backed by singer Harry Belafonte and actor Sidney Poitier – had links to a Kenyan nationalist leader. ‘The motives behind this enterprise, therefore, seem more political than educational,’ warned a letter from the British Embassy in Washington.
It added: ‘The arrival here of these students, many of them of indifferent academic caliber and ill-prepared for the venture, is likely to give rise to difficult problems.’
Difficult problems, indeed!
According to those who think like President Obama, prosperous people not of color have achieved their successes, both now and in the past, on the backs of people of color.
Thus, in Obama’s mind Caucasians have not earned their success and must be whittled down to size by the federal government, including the Department of Justice, where Eric Holder stands ready to advocate on behalf of “his” people.
Slavery, though long ago eradicated in America, is, in and of itself, reason enough to punish the rich with higher taxes and other government sanctions.
Those guilty of Prospering While White, or PWW, must pay the price for the sins of generations long since dead and buried.
Tragically, Obama’s hatred for Caucasians exceeds his love for people of color. That means that the president will act against the interests of white folk even when such action is detrimental to people of color.
Obama’s emotional conflict explains why he pursues meaningless pap like the Buffet rule, an feeble attempt to use the IRS as a political force against the most successful among us.
The Buffet rule, thankfully laid to rest (AGAIN) by the US Senate on Monday, offered nothing in the way of jobs creation or deficit reduction. If fact, it would probably cost Americans even more jobs!
Still, the Buffet rule would temporarily satisfy the liberal lust for pummeling the rich, even if people of color ultimately suffered.
On November 6, Barack Obama must be sent back to the streets of Chicago in order to make room for a president who will serve all Americans!