The 'Laugh Or Cry' Timeline: If Obama destroys America, and the media doesn't report it, does it make a sound?
Obama Floods America With Armed Undocumented Voters
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
“[p]resident” Obama’s support for illegal aliens can be traced back twenty-five years to the late ‘80s when he was a community agitator with groups such as Chicago’s own UNO.
As “[p]resident”, Obama’s exertion of executive privilege to suppress Fast And Furious documents leads to a reasonable suspicion that he had knowledge in 2010 that his administration was arming Mexico’s most ruthless drug cartels with thousands of guns, resulting in (so far) hundreds of people dead.
On August 18th, 2011, DHS’ Napolitano announced the end of deportations for illegal aliens who have not committed “serious” crimes—basically, she just erased the U.S. border.
Obama’s department of “Justice” head Holder has tirelessly sued, or been sued by, every state that has even attempted to account for their voters or hold legitimate elections—Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Arizona, Texas—well, we have 50 of them.
On June 19th, 2012, Obama circumvented Congress, the courts, and the people, and illegally granted amnesty by executive fiat to a million illegal aliens. With millions more on the way here.
On June 25th, 2012, in what may well be the most infantile act of retaliation by any administration in history, hours after the Supreme Court ruled that Arizona can’t legally defend its Mexican border if the federal government refuses to do it, the Department of Homeland “Security” said it won’t take illegal aliens caught by Arizona.
And Tuesday, the Obama administration said it was closing nine Border Patrol stations in four states.
Now think back to the DOJ’s dismissal of the already-completed 2008 voter intimidation case against the Black Panthers, and the White House denial that Black Panther leader Malik Shabazz visited the White House. I don’t know but, how many Malik Shabazzes are there?
The above timeline is a pattern of intentional destruction. But to what end? Is it merely to ensure the reelection of a catastrophic “[p]resident’”? If so, then the inevitable destruction of the American entitlement system, infrastructure, education, way of life—will follow Obama into his second term when not even a ruthless socialist media covering for him will be able to deny it’s his fault.
The actual reason for the Obama Destruction may be much more sinister; To leave his successor a country careening toward a financial cliff in an imploding world, where the only solutions are drastic and sure to inflame the populace by way of a compliant media. And in four years he will return to be kinged.
If Obama destroys America, and the media doesn’t report it, does it make a sound?