Lexicon of the liberal Socialist-Communist Democrats, the word bipartisanship means, ‘do it our way’
Are Establishment Republicans Ready to Give In to Obama?
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
If I’ve said it once in my columns, I’ve said it a dozen or more times; and that is, “in the lexicon of the liberal Socialist-Communist Democrats, the word bipartisanship means, ‘do it our way’.”
As if providing evidence of that one-sided axiom, the head enforcer, Slippery Senate Leader Harry Reid, (D-NV) was quoted by Reuters Money News online November 29, 2012, as saying “A U.S. debt ceiling increase must be part of any deal to resolve the looming ‘fiscal cliff’ of tax increases and spending cuts.”
That is libDem speak for ‘bipartisanship.’ Note carefully the words “must be part of any deal…” Those words shine the spotlight on what Reid and Obama and Pelosi ALL determine is needed if a bi-party agreement is to be accomplished.
Of course Reid and his ‘pressure pals’ know that the chances are probably not terribly far off the table to get the Establishment Republicans, AKA, RINOs to capitulate and give in to the measure that will allow those same ‘budget-bustin’ spendthrift hustlers to continue to send the National Debt Ceiling into even greater and greater as well as insurmountable heights of onerous debt that will destroy not only our country but the rest of the lives of our children and their children for eternity.
These selfish, and utterly stupid and careless Socialist-Communist cretins will not be satisfied until all Americans, including themselves who they mistakenly think will later get their rewards from the corrupt United Nations robbers and frauds. How is it possible that this country can boast of having over sixty million voters who are willing co-conspirators in the demise of what once was the greatest country in the world?
Just fresh off the greatest perpetration of a felonious rip-off by somehow or other rigging nationwide voting machines to return the greatest fraudulent imposter to the highest office of our land and the most incompetent usurper of the presidency ever in the history of this or any other country, these country killers are insanely demanding that they be permitted to accelerate their ruinous destructive actions that they have been carrying on for the past four years.
Somehow we have to dig deep into our pitiful pool of impotent pikers and pluck out a plum who can keep these treasonous traitors at bay for four more years.
And speaking about how out of kilter the libDem country destroyers are in this hour of the sad beginnings to another four years of watching the monument of greatness manufactured by our Founding Fathers being hacked away with glee by the anti-Americans who were, in the main part, nurtured and raised by its goodnesses right here on this land.
Money News that provided the Harry Reid diatribe of non-partisanship noted above with the hand of Reuters, here provides the always refreshing and accurate offerings of the renowned scholar Charles Krauthammer as written by Michael Kling by leading off saying “Budget negotiations aimed at avoiding the fiscal cliff are supposed to be about taking a balanced approach.” At least, Mr. Kling used the word “supposed” when presenting the bipartisanship hoax of Harry Reid. When the entire world knows of something, the hoaxer (Reid) should use a bit of decorum and belief that his audience is on to his shenanigans and stop the lying.
Kling also states that Washington Post opinion writer Charles Krauthammer claims the initial offer from the libDems “is anything but a balanced approach Obama’s audacious new gambit is not a serious proposal to solve our fiscal problems, it’s a raw partisan maneuver meant to neuter the Republicans by getting them to cave on their signature issue as the hold-the-line party on taxes.”
“Obama has two objectives, he asserts. The first is to create “internecine warfare” over taxes among Republicans. The second is to “bury Grover Norquist,” the conservative activist known for pressing Republicans to pledge not to raise taxes.
“Obama is succeeding in his first goal, Krauthammer says.“
As every good Conservative knew House Speaker John Boehner would, Krauthammer writes, “the Republican from Ohio made a preemptive concession by agreeing to raise revenue and prompted Republican infighting by proposing to cap deductions. Republicans are playing into Obama’s hand” and will share the blame for the negativity if the country “goes over the cliff.”
But as Michael Kling says Obama, though past the point of reelection worrying, must still be concerned if an agreement is not reached, his legacy will be a double-dip recession with 9 percent unemployment.
“Obama wants to go back to the tax rates from the Clinton administration” Krauthammer says; “So give Obama the full Clinton. Let him live with that. And with what also lies on the other side of the cliff: 28 million Americans newly subject to the ruinous alternative minimum tax.”
Some weakness in Republican ranks are appearing such as that expressed by Tom Cole, R-OK who would work for tax cuts for under $250K earners and negotiate for the higher rates as reported by CNN.
Personally I feel that, save for the unsteady GOPers and RINOs, Cole is quite unaccompanied in that dry desert. Not many will bring water to that craving beast.