Obama's Fundamental Transformation of America
Global Governance 2025: Rewriting the Life of the Common Man as we know it
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
The “change” promised to the masses by a 2008 electioneering Senator Barack Obama is blanket Global Governance of world populations. “The Fundamental Transformation of America” is its forced membership in the New World Order (NWO).
Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World, published late in 2008 noted that “momentous change was ahead, with the gap between increasing disorder and weakening government structures widening”.
See for yourself proof of suspicions that Obama is more ‘King of the World’ than USA president.
Understand how every Obama Executive Order is a distraction to keep you from understanding that life as we know it will be replaced by a Global Governance that was Obama’s main job to sign, seal and deliver on his arrival at the Oval Office.
Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World and Obama arrived in the White House at the same time, November 7 and November 4, 2008 respectively.
Global Governance 2025: At a Critical Juncture, published September 20, 2010, and its predecessor Global Trends 2025, both produced by the joint efforts of the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence Council (NIC) and the European Union’s Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), started off on the premise that One World Government is necessary because it’s inevitable.
In other words, inevitable by documents prepared by the National Intelligence Council and the European Union—make that the same EU that has failed Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Cyprus among a growing list of other countries, and a recognizable major contributor to the world’s current economic failure.
“The report, Global Governance 2025—a follow-on to the NIC’s 2008 report, Global Trends 2025—posits that the growing number of issues on the international agenda, and their complexity, is outpacing the ability of international organizations and national governments to address these challenges.” (Office of the Director of National Intelligence news release No. 06-10).
In layman’s language: So long sovereignty for all nations.
The Global Governance 2025: A Transformed World was addressing “increasing disorder and weakening government structures widening” at the same time that Rahm Emanuel, then Chief of Staff for President Elect Barack Obama was making his infamous declaration: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste”.
Global Governance 2025 and Global Trends 2025 lean on “fictionalized” future calamities on which they rest their case.
In our shrinking world, many people don’t worry about coming global governance because they’ve been saturated with “It’s all a conspiracy”-type news reports.
Within days of Vice President Joe Biden’s apparent call for a New World Order in Friday’s speech to the Export-Import Bank, some major news sites were already claiming that Biden’s NWO was not meant “in the way that conspiracy theorists mean it”.
Friday’s mention was Biden’s second public NWO reference. During United Nations Week 1992, Biden, in an address entitled “On the Threshold of the New World Order: A Rebirth for the United Nations” at the University of Delaware, stated:
...”The world’s leaders must adopt a new understanding of security. “Collective security today must encompass not only the security of nations,” he said, “but also mankind’s security in a global environment that has proven vulnerable to debilitating changes wrought by man’s own endeavors.
“Thus, in setting an American agenda for a new world order, we must begin with a profound alteration in traditional thought,” he said.
We don’t need bumbling Biden to know The New World Order, aka One World Government/Global Governance, is as real as your toddler’s birthday cake, and it is disingenuous to suggest that it is only the province of conspiracy theorists.
Meanwhile, the word from the proverbial horse’s mouth wipes out all doubt that global governance is only conspiracy theorist driven: “Global communication ensures globalization does not die”. (VI Executive Summary, Global Governance 25: At a Critical Juncture.)