Radical Muslims and their liberal dhimmis
Comprehending the Incomprehensible
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
It is now apparent that not only did Boston Marathon bombers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev abuse the United States’ asylum system, but that untold others hailing from countries with large populations of America-haters (many of them Muslims) have probably been doing likewise.
The United States’ compassion for seekers of asylum from oppressive regimes has long been of benefit to the politically oppressed around the world.
Now this, as well as other doorways of opportunity within our immigration and naturalization bureaucracy are routinely being exploited in order to gain access to Americans with the intention of doing us harm.
The granting of asylum is one of the manners by which the federal government is allowing terrorist cells to develop here, according to Iowa Rep. Steve King, a member of the House Judiciary Committee. This week, my colleague Aaron Klein reported that Ilyas Akhmadov, a high-ranking Chechen separatist leader accused of terrorism by Russia, was granted political asylum in the U.S. and lived for a period of time in – drum roll – Boston.
And what of the young Saudi national, Abdul Rahman Ali Al-Harbi, who was injured in the Marathon bombing, and about whom so much controversy and government obfuscation ensued? His whereabouts remain unknown. Al-Harbi has known the Obamas since 2009, when he entered the US; White House visitor logs have confirmed this. Although there have been several rumors representing his background, none have been substantiated. There’s no doubt that the White House is attempting to make this question go the way of Fast and Furious and the Justice Department’s non-prosecution of certain ethnic minorities controversy.
Concerning immigration reform, there are experts in the field of immigration and lawmakers who have pointed out that the immigration bill being proposed by the Senate’s bipartisan “Gang of 8” contains components that would actually weaken the amnesty process, placing Americans at further risk. A new book “Twilight in America: The Untold Story of Islamist Terrorist Training Camps Inside America” is co-authored by Christian Action Network founder Martin Mawyer and highlights well over a dozen purported terrorist training camps inside the US, some located near very sensitive areas.
Factor in the recent revelation that the FBI and the CIA had been informed by reliable sources in 2012 that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was a potential terrorism risk, and the mind begins to reel.
Why, so many who have seen these red flags wonder, would the administration, corrupt as it is, precipitate as situation wherein we are at risk for widespread attack by Islamists within our own borders?
I believe the answer is simple, and lies in a design I feared from the day Obama won the 2008 election. Barack Obama was positioned where he is in order to exponentially further the socialist agenda in America. His ability to do this where perhaps another individual might not have been able to has a great deal to do with his ethnicity; Obama’s benefactors and colleagues believed that the race card would be invaluable to them relative to shielding him from both criticism and scrutiny – and they were right. The cult of personality that was crafted around him and timing also played parts in this dynamic.
In order to complete the power transfer to the degree that socialist power players desire, it will become an imperative for Obama to declare martial law at some point. This is in part why efforts to dismantle the Second Amendment have been so aggressive since Obama’s re-election. The disadvantages to a well-armed populace in the event of martial law being declared under questionable or illegal circumstances should be obvious.
In any case, there are a number of contingencies in play that may serve the administration in this regard. A coordinated upswell in jihadi activity within the US – just enough to terrify, but not too much to suppress – would be the perfect pretext under which martial law might be declared. Whether this would coincide with, or might catalyze some other social or economic catastrophe remains to be seen.
With regard to Islam and jihadis, Americans are divided along dangerously disparate lines. Those who are coming down on the side of the brothers Tsarnaev (evidenced by such things as #freejahar hashtag campaigns on Twitter) may be the unwitting victims of liberal indoctrination, but they could prove profoundly dangerous in days to come. Thanks to the political left, the “religion” of hating America which has spread among Americans is becoming at least as much of a threat as that posed by Islamic radicals.
Should order break down due to economic considerations or some other circumstance, it is they – not NRA members – who will be looting and prowling the streets looking for those whom they consider blameworthy. While there may be some Muslims among us who do not support jihad, they’ve done nothing to indicate that they won’t look the other way as it occurs. Like the radical Muslims and their liberal dhimmis, we know where they will stand when it hits the fan.