White House: OK, sure, the UN made side deals with Iran and we haven't read them

This Iran fiasco gets worse by the day. Not only did the Obama Administration give Iran the key for easy entry into the nuclear club, but it also freed up lots of Iranian assets that even Susan Rice admits will probably be used to find terrorism.

---

But you haven't even heard the worst of it yet. Now that the White House is asking Congress to vote on the deal, we learn that while Obama and Kerry were negotiating their grand capitulation to the mad mullahs, the UN was working any number of side deals with the Iranians, one of which concerned access to a facility that pretty much everyone suspects is being used to develop ballistic missiles for the delivery of nuclear weapons. So, can Congress at least expect to see the text of these days? Susan Rice:

We have provided Congress with all the documents we drafted or were part of drafting, and all the documents that have been shared with us by the IAEA.

Wait a minute. There are docuuments the IAEA has not shared with the Obama Administration? Yep. Even John Kerry hasn't seen the text of the side deals between the UN and Iran, and yet the White House is asking Congress to vote on the full deal knowing full well that no one in the U.S. knows what's in these side deals. Can I ask a question? What exactly did we get out of this deal? Iran gets nuclear weapons (in spite of what Obama keeps insisting). Iran doesn't have to give us anytime/anywhere access to their facilities. Iran gets to keep shipping arms anywhere it wants in the world, and acquiring arms from anyone it wants. Iran gets its assets unfrozen. Iran can use its money to fund terrorism. What did we get? Nothing. We didn't even get our hostages back. Why in God's name would Obama and Kerry agree to this deal? I've been involved in thousands of negotiations and if I ever agreed to a deal this bad I think I'd retire in shame, since I would have to have completely lost my touch. The only reason I can think of is that Obama just wanted some deal, any deal, so he could claim it for his "legacy" and more importantly so he could claim the Iran issue was settled and people wouldn't bother him about it for the remainder of his presidency. That's hardly what you'd call leadership, but it's consistent with the track record of this president.