WhatFinger

Twitter Natterer ‘Occasional Cortex’

AOC’s Green New Deal Envy On "glamorous" Hope Hick's NYT photo

By Judi McLeod ——--June 23, 2019

Cover Story | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

AOC’s l Green New Envy On glamorous Hope Hick's NYT photoYet another “NO-NO” from the overbearing New York rookie Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: the New York Times running a “glamorous photo” of former Trump aide, Hope Hicks. Don’t go looking good in your New York Times photos, folks—particularly if you happen to be a former Trump aide, because imperious AOC doesn’t like it. “Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) blasted The New York Times for sharing a glamorous photo of former Trump aide, Hope Hicks. (The Blaze, May 28, 2019)
"Wait, what?" You mean Hicks should have telephoned or emailed the NYT demanding that they show a less “glamorous” pic of her? Should Hicks quickly have had less attractive photos taken and shipped them off to the NYT? “Ocasio-Cortez lambasted the outlet on Sunday after it published an article on Hicks, President Donald Trump's former communications director, criticizing the tenor of the article and its accompanying photo.” (The Blaze) AOC, handpicked from a casting crew of 10,000 to run for public office by Senator Bernie Sanders’ Justice Democrats, in office only for six months, creator of the swiped and rejuvenated Green New Deal, is now a self-appointed editor over at the New York Times.
“The 29-year-old freshman congresswoman criticized the coverage of 30-year-old Hicks as "some Lifetime drama called 'Hope's Choice.’" (The Blaze)
Someone should tell this tiresome Drama Queen she’s in the wrong ballpark. Known for its habitual Fake News, the NYT has tossed far more foul balls than the “lifetime drama called Hope’s Choice”.
“The article, which examined Hicks' tenure in the White House, theorized on how she may react to a subpoena from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) in connection to the Russia investigation of the Trump administration. (The Blaze)
Like most Democrats AOC sees keeping drums rolling on the bogus Russian investigation of the Trump administration in news headlines at any cost.

Attacking the physical appearance of your enemy is A-OK with AOC

Attacking the physical appearance of your enemy is A-OK with AOC.
“One of the (NYT) outlet’s Twitter accounts shared the article, captioning it, "Hope Hicks, one of the best-known but least visible former members of President Trump's White House staff, is facing an existential question: whether to comply with a congressional subpoena.” (The Blaze)
If only AOC was less visible! Ocasio-Cortez tweeted;

Support Canada Free Press

Donate
“In a second tweet, the freshman lawmaker added, "In the aftermath of shootings, media routinely post menacing photos of people-of-color victims + dredge up any questionable thing they'd ever done. But when Hope Hicks considers not complying w a subpoena, it's glamour shot time." (The Blaze)
“The House Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Hicks — who stepped down from her White House position in March. Mercifully, the NYT ignored AOC for her “glamour time shot” critique when it’s being sent by photo-shot-all-the-time, Twitter Natterer ‘Occasional Cortex’. Related: Hope Hicks questioned behind closed doors on Capitol Hill, as pols bicker over interview Hope Hicks slams 'chaos' created by Steele dossier in testimony before House Dems; WH blocks dozens of questions
Subscribe

View Comments
Judi McLeod—— -- Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

VIEW Comments

Sponsored