Forward-looking energy policy is jobs policy, and unlocking offshore oil and natural gas resources is an essential step to U.S. economic and energy security

Developing offshore energy means big wins for economy and security


By -- Jack N. Gerard —— Bio and Archives May 8, 2017

Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

WASHINGTON, D.C. — President Trump’s recent executive order expanding offshore energy development is a win for America’s job creation and national security.

The United States leads the world in production and refining of oil and natural gas, adding stability to world markets that’s paying off for families and businesses.

Lifting some of the shortsighted restrictions that keep 94 percent of federal offshore acreage off limits to energy development

Drivers saved over $550 at the pump in 2015, while household budgets saved $1337 on utility bills and energy-related expenses.

The industry supports 9.8 million nationwide jobs across a variety of sectors, including manufacturing, which is experiencing an energy-driven renaissance.

Producers of steel, chemicals, plastics, medicines and numerous other products have seen their power and materials costs drop due to affordable energy, including industrial electricity costs 30-50 percent lower than those of foreign competitors.

Lifting some of the shortsighted restrictions that keep 94 percent of federal offshore acreage off limits to energy development could lead to production gains of more than a million barrels of oil equivalent per day and generate hundreds of thousands of well-paying jobs.

Opening the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, in close proximity to existing production and infrastructure, can quickly spur investment and economic activity, with the potential to generate thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in government revenue.

The benefits of unlocking offshore oil and natural gas are measured not just in jobs and revenue but in energy security.  Every barrel of American-made energy means more protection from the price shocks that overseas turbulence can generate.

Nowhere is energy’s central role in national security more evident than in the Arctic

Nowhere is energy’s central role in national security more evident than in the Arctic.  With Russia and China already active in the region, the Arctic bears strategic significance even beyond its potential to supply enough oil and natural gas to meet California’s energy demands for close to 40 years.

In a letter to the Interior Department last year, military experts warned that withdrawal from the Arctic would “signal retreat, needlessly reducing U.S. flexibility for promoting our national interests and our ability to ensure international cooperation.”

Failure to take advantage of potentially vast offshore resources, whether in the Arctic or the Atlantic, could mean retreat of another kind — retreat back to an era of energy scarcity and dependence.

A new study shows just how costly that could be.  The analysis from leading energy consulting firm OnLocation examines what would happen if government policy were to ban hydraulic fracturing, prohibit new or expanded coal mines and stop permitting energy infrastructure, including pipelines and import/export facilities.

The study projects that steep declines in oil and natural gas production could lead to predictably steep energy cost increases — all contributing to a potential loss of 5.9 million jobs.

The average American household could see its costs jump $4,550 in 2040 due to increased costs for transportation fuel, electricity, home heating and goods and services.

Continued below...

Even under the most optimistic scenarios for renewable energy growth, oil and natural gas will supply 60 percent of U.S. energy needs in 2040

That’s not a future most Americans want.  Eighty percent of U.S. voters support increased domestic oil and natural gas production, and projections show that’s what we need in order to meet domestic and global demand.

Even under the most optimistic scenarios for renewable energy growth, oil and natural gas will supply 60 percent of U.S. energy needs in 2040, and worldwide energy consumption will jump a projected 38.6 percent over the same period.

Our success leading the world in reduction of carbon emissions — which have reached 30-year lows in the power sector due primarily to clean-burning natural gas — demonstrates that energy security and environmental progress aren’t contradictory goals.

President Trump said he would focus on major jobs initiatives in his first 100 days, and he has.  Forward-looking energy policy is jobs policy, and unlocking offshore oil and natural gas resources is an essential step to U.S. economic and energy security.

Jack N. Gerard is president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, the national trade association that represents all aspects of America’s oil and natural gas industry. He holds political science and law degrees from George Washington University Readers may write him at API, 1220 L Street NW, Washington, DC 20005-4070.



Guest Column -- Jack N. Gerard -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Items of notes and interest from the web.

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: