Subscribe to Canada Free Press for FREE

Should Equalization Keep on Growing in an Era of Converging Fiscal Capacity

Flawed equalization program can’t respond fairly to big changes in Canadian economy


By —— Bio and Archives August 22, 2017

Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

TORONTO—As traditional “have” provinces struggle economically, Canada’s equalization program is not equipped to adapt to the country’s new economic landscape, finds a new study released today by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank.

“The economic gap between so-called have and have-not provinces has shrunk, but equalization payments are required to keep growing automatically no matter how much provinces like Alberta and Saskatchewan are struggling,” said Ben Eisen, co-author of Should Equalization Keep on Growing in an Era of Converging Fiscal Capacity?

Over the past two years, four provinces—British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador—did not receive equalization payments, while the rest of the provinces (including Ontario and Quebec) did.

The study shows that over past two years, the provinces that do not receive equalization have collectively seen their fiscal capacity—the ability to raise provincial tax revenue—shrink by 3.5 per cent. By comparison, the collective fiscal capacity of provinces that receive equalization has grown by 8.1 per cent. This means the gap between provinces that receive equalization and provinces that don’t is shrinking.

And as that gap narrows, the total amount Ottawa transfers to the provinces in equalization should shrink, too. That’s how the program has worked at times in the past—equalization payments actually fell for this reason in the early 2000s.

But a 2009 change in the program now requires total equalization payments to increase every year at a rate pegged to national economic growth, regardless of how much the fiscal capacity gap between provinces shrinks.

This rule—introduced to cap equalization increases to ensure program affordability—could actually add as much as $2.7 billion to program costs over the next two years.

Continued below...

“Last year, Quebec generated more resource revenue than Alberta—that’s a perfect illustration of how the gap between have and have-not provinces has narrowed recently. But the rules in place today will actually force equalization transfers to continue to increase,” Eisen said.

“Policymakers should consider reforming the program to make it more responsive to the changing nature of Canada’s economic landscape.”

Media Contact:
Ben Eisen, Director, Provincial Prosperity Studies (in Toronto)
Fraser Institute

Steve Lafleur, Senior Policy Analyst (in Calgary)
Fraser Institute

To arrange media interviews or for more information, please contact:
Bryn Weese
Media Relations Specialist, Fraser Institute
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)



Fraser Institute -- Bio and Archives | Comments

The Fraser Institute is an independent Canadian public policy research and educational organization with offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Montreal and ties to a global network of 86 think-tanks. Its mission is to measure, study, and communicate the impact of competitive markets and government intervention on the welfare of individuals. To protect the Institute’s independence, it does not accept grants from governments or contracts for research. Visit fraserinstitute.org.

Follow the Fraser Institute on Twitter | Like us on Facebook

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: