Keynesian economics' is a misnomer. It is not economics. It is a leftwing political theory
Harvard, Homosexuals, and Far Left Fabians
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
“No matter what phase of left-wing infiltration we study, be it in government, in information media, in foundations, in labor unions…the tracks lead inevitably to Harvard University.” —Zygmund Dobbs “Keynes at Harvard”
“I hope that when we pass this legislation that we will understand that we are doing great damage, and we could possibly – and probably – as the Commandant of the Marine Corps said … harm the battle effectiveness that is so vital to the survival of our young men and women in the military.”—Senator John McCain on repealing DADT (Don’t Ask Don’t Tell)
Zygmund Dobb writes in “Keynes at Harvard,” that “Harvard didn’t adopt the left-wingers, the left-wingers picked Harvard.” A prestigious, hallowed center of learning—what better place to start spreading the poison that would first sicken, and then kill a free United States?
(Sidebar: I believe that if I had sent children to be educated at Harvard—heck, most any college or university these days—I’d be seriously looking into suing to get some tuition money back. Indoctrination is not education. Good luck finding a decent conservative lawyer though—they aren’t exactly a dime a dozen. The law schools, along with journalism schools, were some of the first places that the Far Left targeted for infiltration and subversion—we can see the results in the duplicitous “reporting” and lawfare all around us.
As I’ve mentioned before, St. John’s College, whose roots go back to 1696, seems to be one of the few good bets left for receiving a true education. Here’s hoping they continue to hold to their high standards).
Be that as it may. In the late 1950s a group of conservative Harvard alumni, distressed and concerned over the increasingly leftist slant of their alma mater, started an investigation into the collectivist (Marxist, Fascist, Communist, Fabian….) infiltration of Harvard (“actually all these people are striving toward the same end—concentration of power in the hands of a few”).
They quickly found that to research all of the teachers and departments was too big a job to handle in a timely manner. “After due deliberation it was decided to concentrate on the Economics Department…as the breeding ground of much of Harvard leftism.” Even so, the research took around ten years to complete.
The alumni found that the primary economic system being taught at Harvard was the Keynesian system—named after John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946). They found that “Keynesian economics’ is a misnomer. It is not economics. It is a leftwing political theory.”
The Fabians believe in ‘easing’ into absolute power by deceit
Keynes (pronounced “canes”) was a Fabian. “The Fabians believe in ‘easing’ into absolute power by deceit. The Communists and Fascists believe in attaining power quickly by violence.”
Keynes’ genius, such as it was, lay in cleverly hiding his treacherous deceits behind a fog of arcane, verbose. obfuscating language (SOP for the Far Left actually).
“He clothed the clearest facts in the most complicated phraseology. In this way the clearest facts have been beclouded. Businessmen often confuse such verbiage for profundity and are led to believe that the Keynesians have exclusive knowledge of some magic formulas incapable of being grasped by the average man. This is exactly what Keynes and his followers wished. It gave them carte blanche to pursue their ends.”
Indeed, so successful has Keynes’ legerdemain been, that it long ago became difficult, if not impossible, to tell who was following Keynesian economics because they’d been duped, and who was following Keynesism knowing full well it was a Far Left ploy to sicken, and eventually ruin, capitalism.
“Even sound economists do not realize that Keynes’ obscurity is deliberate. ...They do not come to grips with the true state of affairs, namely, that Keynesism is not an economic theory. It is a weapon of political conspiracy.”
(If you wish a crash course in demystifying Keynesian economics, and spotlighting its deceits, then I strongly recommend reading a copy of “Keynes at Harvard: Economic Deception as a Political Credo.” Although it was first published forty years ago, it is still remarkably relevant. Every businessman or businesswoman interested in free enterprise should read it).
Keynes was a life-long sexual deviate
Dobbs continues, “In 1967 the world was startled by the publication of the letters between Lytton Strahey and Maynard Keynes. Undisputed correspondence shows that Keynes was a life-long sexual deviate. What was more shocking was that these practices extended to a large group [the Fabians and their coterie].”
“Homosexuality, sado-machochism, lesbianism, and the liberate policy of corrupting the young was the established practice of this large and influential group which eventually set the political and cultural tone for the British Empire.”
What do you want to bet that America’s “large and influential” group of Power Elites stand where Great Britain’s stood fifty years ago? Any takers? Is it just me, or does there seem to be an inordinate amount of homosexuals, lesbians, and Keynesians in high government positions of power these days? Just asking. (Link) and (Link) and (Link)
Dobbs describes an incestual orgy of love triangles, trysts, betrayals, drug use, and sex of such a bizarre and Byzantine nature that it would make a jaded TV soap-opera writer’s head spin.
Dobbs observes that “Deception and trickery coupled with acid criticism of everything moral…as “reactionary” is standard fare among them. ...The fact that the Keynes-Strachey Fabian socialist coterie practiced sodomy, lecheurism [lecherousness], lesbianism, coprolagnia [sexual enjoyment of human excrement], scatophagy [eating human excrement], and uragnia [sexual enjoyment of human urine], is evidence of infantilism carried to the point of psychopathia.” One gets the feeling from Dobb’s book that the list of depravities just named is only the tip of the iceberg (”...this writer struggled to keep the presentation within the bounds of good taste…”).
Dobbs continues, “By persistent permeation of the centers of information, education, and government the deviates have been able to invest themselves with a “Progressive” and “Liberal” cover. ...They cultivated not only the deceptive devices of the covert pervert, but also inherited the massive arsenal of political tricks accumulated for generations in the socialist movement. The socialist perverts became in fact a living embodiment of continuous employment of falsification and practiced deceit.”
Defeminization of women via state intervention, and the shattering of the family as a cohesive unit….
Is it any wonder that Planned Abortion (sorry, Parenthood) should find such strong support among the Far Left judges, lawyers, and politicians, who echo Keynes’ strong “aversion to human conception, [and] marital fidelity,” and his support for the “defeminization of women via state intervention, and the shattering of the family as a cohesive unit….”
As “Keynes at Harvard” notes, “These organized perverts acted out a distorted “Alice through the looking glass” performance. Their bleatings for equal rights for homosexuality was promptly converted into general harassment of the normal population. The cry to be left alone hid covert moves to control and exploit the heterosexual majority.”
Insofar as advancing that last bit, nothing has been so effective as Political Correctness—where we end up policing our own thoughts. The Seinfeld episode with the recurring “Not that there’s anything wrong with that” line, is a classic case in point.
Dobbs continues with a quick psychological hip-shot. “Homosexual preoccupation with decreasing population and crusades for birth control has at its foundation their sense of revulsion against normal procreative sex,” Speaking of psychology, Dobbs makes some eyebrow raising observations regarding the roots of psycho-analysis. At least my eyebrows were raised—maybe not so for you.
“Havelock Ellis, the sexual psychopath (a ‘masochichistically feminine’ Fabian who enjoyed the company of ‘aggressive lesbians’), is hailed in our halls of learning as, ‘The Father of social psychology’ and is installed as one of the great progenitors of modern psychiatry. ...This might be analogous to investing the inmates of our mental hospitals with the right to set the guidelines for the sane population.” Ellis was a co-founder of The Fabian Society in 1884. (Link)
To finish up with the less than stellar roots of psychiatry: After marrying fellow Fabian socialist Edith Lee, Ellis “drove her into lesbianism…plus drugs [which] caused Edith to lose her sanity. ...She [suffered] a complete mental collapse after Ellis wrote her that he was having a rather bizarre and abnormal relationship with Margaret Sanger…” [“sainted” founder of Planned Parenthood].
“Ellis antedated Freud when he declared, ‘I regard sex as the central problem of life.” [I’ll just bet he did]. “Sigmund Freud was in close collaboration with Ellis….” In addition “James Strachey, the brother of [Keynes’ male lover], was addicted to a passion for young men, and his wife Alix was a consort of a notorious lesbian. They both studied under Freud while adhering to militant atheism and Fabian socialism.” I told you this stuff is better (or worse, depending on your tastes) than any soap-opera.
All of this occurred after Freud (a rabid atheist) addicted a number of his patients to cocaine, and as Dr. Carl Jung recounts, seduced his wife’s sister into a sexual relationship. No wonder Dobbs concludes, “A thorough scientific re-evaluation of the motivations and the distortions of the founders of psycho-analysis as a “sick” movement is long overdue.” Yikes, and Ellis and Freud are respectively the “Father of psychology,” and the “Father of psychiatry?” No wonder our culture’s so screwed up. (Link)
Great, just wonderful. The Liberals hold up two twisted fruitcakes as paragons of mental health, and Harvard grad, homosexual/bisexual pervert “par excellence,” Alfred Kinsey, as the exemplar of proper sexual conduct—yowza and yipee! (Video)
To get back to Keynes, homosexuality, and the Fabians. I think that Fabian George Bernard Shaw (not “Mental Health Monthly” centerfold material either), is an ideal representative of Fabianism. Behind the genial, avuncular look and demeanor of this liberal icon, was the Machiavellian mind of a ruthless monster. (Video)
“Uncle” George informed us that “come the revolution” an Inquisition will be installed to decide who “can safely be allowed to live at large in a civilized community.” Shaw goes on to say that “The convicted, knowing that the Inquisition was considering the case, could never go to bed with any certainty of being alive next morning. But this uncertainty would not concern the convicted only. It would concern everybody; for the question of fitness to live could be raised about anybody, whether any indictable crime had been committed or not.” Lovely. (Link)
The hackneyed phrase “fiendish glee” springs to mind. Hackneyed or not, I can all too easily picture Shaw rubbing his hands together in “fiendish glee” as he imagines how his Fabian socialist “utopia” will be run. Modern day Fabians such as ex-British Prime Minister Tony Blair, or ex-Prime Minister Gordon Brown, would of course dismiss “Uncle” George’s descriptions as “just off the cuff idle blather,” or some such. The thing is, G.B. Shaw spewed a LOT of “off the cuff idle blather” such as the above quote. There was nothing “idle” about it. (Link)
Dobbs notes that “Shaw was a chief patron and sponsor of Keynes in Fabian socialist circles in England and the United States.” Also of interest is the observation that “Henry Dexter White and Keynes were inseparable in the United States shortly before Keynes died. ..The facts are inconvertible that White served as a Soviet agent while doubling with Keynes as the architect of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund [IMF].” (That should make us all feel better about where our hard-earned tax dollars are going).
Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell
In a recent issue of the purportedly conservative magazine “The Weekly Standard,” Gary Schmitt and Cherl Miller wrote in an article about the repeal of DADT that, “Not everyone agrees with the decision to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
Yes, I suppose it’s possible that there are a few heterosexual holdouts in the hinterlands of “fly-over country.” Schmitt and Miller continue “But its repeal does provide an opening for repairing relations between some of the nation’s top universities, and the military services….” Well we certainly can all be thankful for that! And here I was, thinking that the vociferous campus rants against the military were fueled by a leftist hatred of America, capitalism, and America’s military might. Silly me—just goes to show how wrong you can be.
In all seriousness, what the “Weekly Standard” article underlines, is the vast chasm between Washington D.C.‘s indoctrinated elite, and “we the people.” Remember that the “Weekly Standard” is a “conservative” Beltway insider magazine, and Republican Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, George Voinovich of Ohio, and Mark Kirk of Illinois voted to repeal DADT—as well as 15 House Republicans. (Link)
I can tell you straight out that I am not all right with the repeal of DADT. I am so far from being “all right,” that I can’t begin to tell you how not “all right” I am.
Elaine Donnelly of “Center for Military Readiness (CMR) writes “...repeal of the 1993 law will not go into effect until 60 days after the naïve Adm. Mullen [“naïve ” is not the word I would have used], President Barack Obama, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates jointly “certify” that the new LGBT Law will not have negative effects on military effectiveness. The incoming 112th Congress should reconsider that legislation….” (Link)
Got that House Republicans? “Reconsider that legislation.” And don’t just reconsider it—annihilate it, zap it, deep-six it, nuke it, and terminate it with extreme prejudice! It’s the most subversive, obscene piece of vile legislation ever foisted on “we the people,” and it should not stand, must not stand, will not stand.
I’m sick and tired of keeping my peace as my rights, religion, country, and culture are debased, dismissed, dismantled, and destroyed. I’ve endured decades of this “death by a thousand cuts.” No more.
There is absolutely no reason to turn our military upside-down and inside-out so that a small minority of sexual deviants can feel righteous. A century of Fabian/Communist/Fascist lies notwithstanding, they are NOT righteous. (Link)
The only pragmatic reason to repeal DADT is to weaken, demoralize, and confuse the US military. The new House Republicans say they are going to change things? They might start by having the quisling members of the Pentagon who supported the repeal of DADT exchange places with LTC Lakin and the “Leavenworth 10.” Now that would be change I can believe in. (Link)
No more “Mr. Nice Guy”—the “Welcome” mat is officially withdrawn. Now and forever.