Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund is opposed to HR 2749

HR 2749 - The Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009


By —— Bio and Archives June 28, 2009

Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Passage of the FSEA into law would amend the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).  The bill proposes a substantial increase in power and resources for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and would significantly diminish existing judicial restraints on actions taken by the agency.

Although the bill includes some provisions that could improve the mainstream food system, many of these are vaguely worded and do not clearly define the scope of the agency’s power, creating the potential for inappropriate application and enforcement.  Small farms and local artisanal producers are part of the solution to the food safety problem in this country; the bill would impose on them a one-size-fits-all regulatory scheme and would disproportionately impact their operations for the worse.  A detailed analysis of some of the key provisions is below [the citations are to the relevant section and page number of the June 10 version of the bill].

The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund is opposed to HR 2749 because it would adversely impact small farms and food producers, without providing significant reforms in the industrial food system.  HR 2749 does not address the underlying causes of food safety problems, including industrial agriculture practices and the consolidation of our food supply.

More…


Guest Column -- Bio and Archives | Click to view Comments

Items of notes and interest from the web.


  NM.init({ widgetId: ì-i_435_zyfLuP-J29zeiwF09OAC08oA-RZ5oBNv9î, template: ìNM10î, articleSelector: ì.nmWidgetContainerArticleî });