High River ATIP requests are now being "Exempted in their Entirety" by RCMP

RCMP Slam doors shut on High River Access To Information requests


By —— Bio and Archives June 1, 2015

Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

It’s one thing for the RCMP to refuse to send all the records I have requested, under the authority of the Access to Information Act (ATIP), regarding the RCMP’s illegal searches of 4,666 High River homes following the 2013 flood; however, it’s quite another thing to exempt ALL the records I requested in their entirety. I couldn’t believe it the first time it happened but now that I have received three responses in a row from the RCMP saying I was being denied copies of ALL the records I requested.  It appears that a blanket cover-up is now underway on the High River Forced Entries, Unwarranted Searches and Seizures file.

Here are the three High River ATIP files that have be exempted in their entirety in the last five weeks.  Please note the hyperlinks in the titles below take you directly to my letters of complaint filed with the federal Information Commissioner and supporting documentation.

ATIP FILE #1: Exempted Entirely 2,458 pages of RCMP Officers Notes of Firearms Seizures
My Access Request - September 11, 2013: Please find attached the RCMP Constable’s notes documenting the firearms seizure from 630 Hampton Place in High River, Alberta on June 24, 2013.  For the period from June 20, 2013 to present, please provide copies all notes taken by officers “securing”  firearms and other valuables from homes in High River, Alberta during the flood.

RCMP Response - April 14, 2015 (19 months late): April 14, 2015 - RCMP response: “As a result of the above mentioned court proceedings the requested information has been exempted in its entirety under section 16(1)(a)(ii) of the Act.”

ATIP FILE #2: High River Crown Counsel Paper “exempted in its entirety” by RCMP

My Access Request - August 19, 2014:  Reference is being made to the attached e-mail exchange on June 25, 2013 between Bill Sweeney, Assistant Deputy Minister/Director of Law Enforcement, Public Security Division of Alberta Justice and Solicitor General and Marianne Ryan, Assistant Commissioner, Office in Charge “K” Division Criminal Operations regarding the “legal authorities” the RCMP were using for their forced entry into hundreds homes in High River, Alberta. Please provide (1) A copy of the “legal authorities” . . . “paper from Crown counsel” referred to in the attached e-mail by Marianne Ryan that was prepared “to give out to our folks speaking to the media for their reference and confidence in speaking to this issue to the public”; (2) Copies of the materials provided to RCMP officers speaking to the media regarding the legal authorities for the forced entries and firearms seizures in High  River; and,  (3) Copies of all the follow-up communications responding to Bill Sweeney’s question: “What legal authority do the police rely upon to forcibly enter private property in the flood stricken area?”

RCMP Response - May 1, 2015 (10 months late):  “Please be advised the information requested in this file has been exempted in its entirety under section 16(1)(a)(ii) of the Act.”

ATIP FILE #3 - Pages Ripped out of RCMP Notebooks subject to blanket exemption 

My Access Request - December 1, 2014: Rumors persist in High River that some of the 273 RCMP officers deployed in High River during the flood of 2013 have ripped pages out of their notebooks with the handwritten notes they took during their duties in High River. Please provide copies of all records, reports, e-mails, correspondence, communications, documentation, audits and instructions, concerning the notes and notebooks of RCMP officers who worked in High River, Alberta between June 20, 2013 and July 13, 2013.  If records confirm that RCMP officer’s notes were in fact removed from their notebooks then it is important that the response to this request also include all records, regarding the disposition of these handwritten notes (i.e. were these notes destroyed, archived in High River files, provided to the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP or were they put to some other use?)

RCMP Response - May 22, 2015 (6 months late): “Please be advised that a review of the records located reveals that all of the information you have requested qualifies for exemption pursuant to Section 16(1)(a)(ii) of the Act,” 16. (1) “The head of a government institution may refuse to disclose any record requested under this Act that contains (a) information obtained or prepared by any government institution, or part of any government institution, that is an investigative body specified in the regulations in the course of lawful investigations pertaining to (i) the detection, prevention or suppression of crime, (ii) the enforcement of any law of Canada or a province,...”

COMMENT:  We were all told that High River was a search and rescue mission - not an “enforcement” operation!

RESPONSES TO MY OUTSTANDING HIGH RIVER ATIP REQUESTS NOW IN DOUBT

My ATIP request 082 - June 19, 2014 - All Camera Footage Taken in High River
Reference is being made to this URL immediately below which is a copy of the RCMP video released to the media during the High River Flood, Forced Entries and Firearms Seizures in June of 2013

For the period from June 20, 2013 to July 10, 2013, please provide a copy of all camera footage taken in High River (stills photographs, cell-phone pictures, film, video and accompanying sound recordings and transcripts) in the possession of the RCMP, including a complete copy of the above mentioned video that includes all the edited out sections.
Status of this ATIP request RCMP FILE: A-2014-04555

October 6, 2014 - ATIP Advisor reviewing 1786 pages
October 22, 2014 - ATIP Advisor consulting with DND - Videos to take longer
February 6, 2015 - ATIP Advisor says: 16 more videos still to review
July 19, 2015 - This ATIP request will be one year old.

My ATIP request 090 - November 13, 2014 - 1,900 Damage Claims Against RCMP 

On September 5, 2013 at the Town Hall Meeting in High River, Alberta  S/Sgt. Ian Shardlow, the NCO in charge of the High River Detachment stated:  “We started to collect the information, we basically solicited people to come forward with the complaints and the numbers are correct it’s around 19 hundred, I’m going to suggest it will probably stop before two thousand.”  
Please provide copies of each and every complaint that S/Sgt. Ian Shardlow was referring to in the above statement and copies of any and all reports prepared as a result of these 1,900+ complaints.
Status of this ATIP request RCMP FILE: A-2014-08266
March 10, 2015 - RCMP assessed processing fees of $3,150
March 25, 2015 - Complaint filed about exorbitant cost estimate

My ATIP request 097 - May 12, 2015 - Use of Long-gun Registry Data in High River? 

Reference is being made to the RCMP response to Access to Information Act File A-2013-04535 / F141 wherein the requestor asked 12 questions and the RCMP provided the answers.

Reference is also being made to an event that occurred in July of 2013 (eight months after all copies of the long-gun registry were supposed to be destroyed as ordered by an Act of Parliament) Don White went to the RCMP detachment in High River, Alberta to pick up his eleven trigger-locked long guns, the RCMP officer informed Don that that two of his long-guns weren’t registered. Don advised the officer, “That’s right, the two new shotguns we just bought!”  How did the RCMP officer in High River know that two of Don White’s long-guns weren’t registered?

My ATIP request 098 - May 16, 2015 - Destruction of Long-gun Registry?

Reference is being made to: RCMP AUDIT OF THE DESTRUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS IN THE ENDING THE LONG-GUN REGISTRY ACT FINAL REPORT: JANUARY 2013  EXCERPT: The steps detail the work involved in destroying all records, both electronic and hard copy, from the RCMP/CFP information stores, except those records related to public agencies and individuals and businesses residing in Quebec, which will be retained.  

(Footnote 5) The requirements of the Ending the Long-gun Registry Act do not apply to public agencies. Recording requirements for public agencies fall under the Public Agents Firearms Regulations. Public agencies are police forces and other government departments, such as Correctional Service Canada, that have requirements to hold firearms.

For the period from April 1, 2012 to present, please provide copies of all records, directives, updated standing orders, e-mails, and correspondence sent to RCMP Detachments with respect to the retention, destruction and use of copies of long-gun registry records held in the Detachments.

My ATIP request 104 - May 18, 2015 - Number of Arrests in High River?

Reference is being made to the 155-pages received in response to RCMP File A-2014-01213 that I received on May 30, 2015 and to the following transcribed quotes taken from the handwritten notes:
PDF page 85 - “STO c/o EOC - Cpl Racette advising members to arrest all found ins.”
PDF PAGE 96 - “Q) What doing about found-ins that sneak in? Are they being arrested? Yes”
PDF PAGE 122 -  “Task #24 - Clarify message out to membership about arresting found-ins”  

For the period from June 20, 2013 and July 20, 2013 please provide copies of records, documents, reports, correspondence, e-mails, and presentations showing: (1) the total number of arrests made in High River, Alberta including the legal authorities for these arrests; (2) the total number of persons taken into custody as a result of these arrests; and (3) the number and types of charges laid as a result of these arrests including the disposition of these charges.

Since the High River Forced Entries, Unwarranted Searches and Seizures first became public on June 28, 2013, I have filed 45 federal Access to Information Act (ATIP) requests and eight Alberta Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) requests. Incomplete responses to these requests led to the filing of 25 missing records complaints to the federal Information Commissioner and three missing records complaints to the Alberta Information and Privacy Commissioner.

After two years of investigating the actions of the RCMP, Department of National Defence, Alberta Ministry’s of Justice and Municipal Affairs, it would appear that there is a concerted effort on behalf of officials in both levels of government to keep the truth well under wraps - I hope not.  Let’s all hope, for the sake of communities who may face a State of Local Emergency in the future, that it is just a lack of awareness of the seriousness of these Charter rights violations on behalf of our political leaders in Ottawa and in Edmonton.

It’s time for a real political leader to take charge of the High River investigation.  Time for Alberta’s new Premier to find out why things went so terribly wrong in High River but not in any of the other 30 Alberta flooded communities. And, if not Premier Notley then Brian Jean, the Leader of the Official Opposition.  Time to find out what role Alberta government officials played in making these mistakesTime to get answers to all the unanswered questions.  Time to rebuild trust among High River residents.  It’s been almost two years and the whole truth has still not been told.  Maybe it’s time to ask those in that were in charge of the High River mess some very direct questions under oath.



Dennis R. Young -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Dennis Young retired to Airdrie, Alberta in 2007 after working for 13 years on Parliament Hill for Garry Breitkreuz, MP for Yorkton-Melville. Dennis is a member of the Calgary RCMP Veterans Association and a Honourary Life Member of both the Canadian Shooting Sports Association and the National Firearms Association. For his 20-year crusade for the rights of firearms owners, Dennis received the NFA’s David A. Tomlinson Memorial Award for 2014 and the CSSA’s John Holdstock Memorial Award for 2014.

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: