One of the most visible effects of Mr. Donald Trump's presidency is that it has triggered an open resistance from the stealth forces that for the last several decades now have been driving the theft of America. On one hand, the said resistance makes it more urgent to deal with the threat that the said forces pose to this nation, which adds to the already heavy burden of reversing decades of devastating damage inflicted by the Liberal demagogues, most notably, by the Obama administration, (formerly) embedded in the political branches of the U.S. government. On the other hand, it allows for a fairly accurate assessment of how deeply entrenched in the structures of political power, both at federal and state levels, they have been. I am not particularly easy to impress, but my jaw dropped when I saw the scope of the wide-spread plot of the hostile takeover of America as it recently unveiled itself in its entirety in front of eyes of mostly unsuspecting Americans.
To see the above plot from a better perspective, let's start from some basic facts.
We and our ancestors have built this country of ours, America. Mostly it was our hard work, self-restraint, and ingenuity, that produced an unprecedented wealth that gave us the highest living standards that any nation has ever earned. Meanwhile, while we were working, they were busy multiplying beyond their nations' means, without regard for who was going to pay for the results of their reproductive excesses. Now, they are coming to our country and demanding that we share with them the fruits of ours' and our ancestors' work for the benefit of theirs and their progeny. As if the mere fact that they keep making more children than they can afford to rear automatically entitled them to what we built and the hard-earned money that we saved.
"They" are the millions of illegal aliens who, often posing as "immigrants", invade our country with blatant violation of its border and the law. They disrespect our natural rights to liberty and property, and - is some cases - to life. They band together in their well-concerted efforts to steal America from us, and are turning outright hostile towards those of us who dare to resist the theft. Like an invading army, they form beachheads within our country from which the invasion spreads. Unfortunately for us, many of our elected governments have neglected their sworn duty to defend us from the invasion and facilitate it, instead. They all play into the hands of the forces that plot and propel the hostile takeover of America.
California provides prime examples of such government-sponsored beachheads. Here, many authorities of all levels not only tolerate the commonality of immigration lawbreaking, but also assist the illegal aliens in avoiding being caught, and even have the audacity to openly brag about it. Taxpayers dollars are used to thwart enforcement of the immigration law as it was the God-given right of the state and local governments to chose which federal laws to obey and which not to. State employees are instructed to resist federal immigration enforcement and to shield the illegal aliens from that enforcement. As a matter of fact, the State of California acts as if it were a sovereign nation empowered with a discretion of setting its own immigration policy that favors the needs and interests of the aliens over Americans. Not surprisingly, the population of ethnics that are prevailing among the illegals is rapidly growing at the expense of those ethnics that are not, and so are the anti-American sentiments among the California residents, notable political influence of the chauvinist Mexican organization La Raza and a trend towards a secession form the Union being but two examples.
Some see it as a spontaneous, or natural, process, which it is not. It was decades of diligent work of devoted nation-wreckers who, under the auspices of the California Democrat Party desperate to import its new voting masses that would later propel it to the monopoly of political power, managed to impose the rule of the quasi-treacherous government on the (once) Golden State. (Oddly enough, they are remarkably quick to charge those much more patriotic than they are with "treason".) Under such pretexts as social justice, diversity, and anti-racism, they maneuvered enough ethno-centric representatives of the invading nations into the key positions in California's political power structures to ensure that the invasion continues uninterrupted and that the Americans with no loyalty to the invasive ethnics are reduced to powerless minority in their own state as they are taxed for the benefit of the invaders and their offspring.
In order to amplify the destruction of national bonds that despite the existing diversity of the American people have made our country stronger and more prosperous than other nations, and to ensure that the imported masses of new Americans remain indefinitely the decisive force in the hands of the nation-wrecking lobby, under the pretext of celebration of multiculturalism the newcomers are being routinely discouraged from assimilation so that even many of those who are assimilable do not turn into regular Americans who have renounced allegiances to their native countries, ethnics, and societies, and replaced them with the loyalty to this country, its people, and the Constitution. That such assimilation is not the prevailing trend (to say the least) among the recent immigrants, legal and illegal, one can easily conclude from their massive demonstrations during which they wave foreign flags, advocate (often in foreign languages) foreign laws and cultures, and express their contempt of America, its duly elected government, and its laws. But who in his right mind would expect that the invading masses to sever their bonds with their invasive nations and ethnics and decide to work for the benefit of the invaded country, America, and the American people from whom they are stealing?
This politically induced nation-wrecking effort has produced its intended and lasting results. For instance, according to Breitbart, "California State Senate President Pro Tem Kevin De Léon (D-Los Angeles) said [on February 2, 2017] that “half his family” was in the country illegally, using false documents, and eligible for deportation under President Trump’s new executive order against “sanctuary” jurisdictions." With a top state lawmaker like this, how can one expect the California government to voluntarily abandon its role as the sponsor of the illegal-alien invasion and a staunch defender of its beachheads? Or that state authorities crack down on bellicose mayors of "sanctuary cities", like Eric Garcetti, mayor of Los Angeles - a city with an estimated half-million illegal alien population, who are openly aiding and abetting immigration lawbreakers with blatant disregard for the federal law and the safety of lawful residents and refusing to cooperate with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement?
Support Canada Free Press
The deceitf of those officials who facilitate immigration lawbreaking is astonishing; they claim that immigration non-enforcement makes the law-abiding residents safer. Such absurd assertion is not supported by verifiable evidence and is contradicted by voluminous crimes committed by the illegal aliens who were spared deportation. On another occasion, they claim that they cooperate with the federal authorities but only if there is a court warrant for an arrest (it's been one of the Mayor Garcetti's favorite lines). Using such a "logic", they could refuse to stop a bank robbery in progress unless there is already a court arrest warrant for the robbers. One can see the absurdities of this kind as a result of attributing a greater value to the safety of lawbreakers than to the safety of the law-abiding.
With so much obvious lawbreaking in California and elsewhere, one would think the Judiciary Branch were busy with punishing the lawbreakers and their enablers. But such is not the case, at least not on the East Coast that remains under the jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Here, several judges perceive themselves not bound by what the federal law is but by what they think the law should be. That would not be necessarily bad if they exhibited an overriding commitment to the U.S. Constitution and the interest of the American citizenry. Unfortunately, many of those judges were educated by the members of the very same nation-wrecking lobby that was instrumental for the imposition of the un-American government on California. So, they not only don't see anything wrong with state and local governments thwarting the enforcement of the immigration law, but themselves try, by means of "restraining orders", thwart the lawful efforts of the Executive Branch that aim at stopping the influx of invasive ethnies and restoring the rule of law that is supposed to serve We the People, as opposed to the foreign nationals however needy they might be. Unfortunately, as of today, these activist judges - for no other reason than judicial usurpation of power over foreign policy issues - seem to have an upper hand.
So, what can be done to stop the invasion and prevent the theft of America that it brings about?
Fortunately, we do have the President who is on our side. Not being a career politician and having a reputation of a talented negotiator, he may not be fully aware of how powerful is he. Certainly, he needs to negotiate with the Congressional members of his own party, but negotiating with state and local governments that break the federal law is neither necessary nor advisable. Particularly, if the force is on his side.
Here are some Constitutional powers that he can invoke while cracking down on the nation-wreckers and their collaborators.
Article IV Section 4: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; [...]."
The "Republican Form of Government" clause implies that the state governments must be accountable to the American citizens and not to other entities. In particular, these governments must not be representations, nor may they pass laws and govern on behalf, of aliens as by doing so they would de facto, if not de jure, submit the Americans to the foreign powers that are unaccountable to them. Thus California government, that does submit - however partially - the American citizens to aliens' will or rule, is not entirely a "Republican Form of Government" in the sense of the Founders’ conception as outlined in James Madison's Federalist papers. Also, the duty to protect against invasion does not cease just because the invaders outnumber the invaded; there are millions of American citizens who permanently live in California that desperately need to be protected from the invasion.
Article II Section 3: "He [...] shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed,[...]."
This power gives the President the right to crack down on defiant mayors, activist judges, and other officials who violate the federal law or obstruct its enforcement. In particular, the activist judges who interfere with his plenary power to suspend the entry of aliens or classes of aliens vested in the President by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) should be brought to compliance with the law by the U.S. Justice Department and not by an appeal to some higher-level activist judges. It is of importance here that those foreign nationals who are willing to participate in anti-President Trump rallies (most of Mexican aliens appear to belong to this category) are automatically inadmissible according to the INA.
Article VI: [...] "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; [...] shall be the Supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. The [...] Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; [...]."
This Article, together with quoted above Article II Section 3, gives the President the power to bring all the state and local governments to compliance with the federal immigration law, in particular, with INA. Those who refuse to support it should be impeached for violation of the oath of office.
Amendment XIV Section 1: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States; [...]."
This is, perhaps, the strongest prerogative that the President can invoke here as it was historically enforced by federal marshals. In particular, it implies that no state can tax the citizens of the U.S. on behalf of the aliens (legal or otherwise), or to submit the citizens of the U.S. to the rule of aliens (say, by means of admitting non-citizens to any governing bodies or courts of law), as the U.S. citizens are immune from being ruled and taxed by foreign entities, or to be deprived of the right to education, however partially, in order to provide the same for the aliens.
Article IV Section 2: "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several states."
In particular, citizens of the U.S. in California are entitled to all protections against illegal aliens that are offered to citizens of the U.S. in Arizona and in any other state, where criminal aliens are turned in to the federal authorities for deportation (after serving their time) rather than being released on the streets where many of them commit more crimes against the said citizens, including rape and murder. It is of importance here that the draconian anti-gun laws imposed on U.S. citizens in California that make it more difficult for the said citizens to defend themselves against this kind of crimes clearly violate the quoted above Section 2, and as such should be struck down. We, the American citizens, need our Second Amendment right in order to better resist the stealing of America by illegal aliens and their sponsors, collaborators, and beneficiaries. If a law-abiding citizen in, say, Kansas, has a privilege to carry a loaded firearm for self-defense or defense of property then any law-abiding citizen in California is entitled to the same privilege. And the fact that the ethnies that are prevailing among the California's illegals, as well as their descendants, appear generally supportive of the state's anti-gun laws does not override the U.S. Constitution and its Amendments.
Amendment XIV Section 1: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."
As it was suggested by many authors and some constitutional scholars, the U.S. Congress, on request of the President, should clarify the meaning of the phrase: "subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.". Persons born on American soil to the parents who are foreign national are usually subject to the jurisdiction of foreign entities and, therefore, not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. It is utterly absurd, as it is un-Constitutional to award such persons birth citizenship.
Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America: "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; [...] so help me God."
Perhaps, it is time to establish a speedy process in which the naturalized aliens who have violated their Oath of Allegiance be stripped off their U.S. citizenship.
I urge President Trump to consider all the above powerful options at his disposal and to implement a decisive crack down on all mentioned above violators in California and elsewhere. His bold words and executive actions provoked the architects and organizers of the America's theft to show their true colors so now that we know who they are it is time to stop them with the irresistible force of the federal law for negotiations are mostly successful if conducted from the position of power.
Mr. Dwyer has been a continuing contributor to the Federal Observer. Mark Andrew Dwyer’s commentaries (updated frequently) can be found here. Send your comments to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
