WhatFinger

Current law says no one can serve as Secretary of Defense if he has served in the military at any time in the past seven years

Trump Pentagon choice James 'Mad Dog' Mattis appears perfect for the job, but has one serious problem



When even Trump-hater David French loves the choice, there must be something awfully special about Defense Secretary designee James Mattis:
He is clear about the Iranian threat, has worked closely with Israel, and has served as the supreme allied commander of transformation for NATO and the chief of Central Command. In other words, few men have been as closely involved in American military planning and war fighting as Mattis. His speeches and statements are legendary. He fights hard, and he fights honorably.
I can get behind a man who says this: Find the enemy that wants to end this experiment (in American democracy) and kill every one of them until they’re so sick of the killing that they leave us and our freedoms intact. Or this: The first time you blow someone away is not an insignificant event. That said, there are some *******s in the world that just need to be shot. There are hunters and there are victims. By your discipline, you will decide if you are a hunter or a victim. And this statement is for all American warriors, not just Marines: For the mission’s sake, for our country’s sake, and the sake of the men who carried the Division’s colors in past battles — “who fought for life and never lost their nerve” — carry out your mission and keep your honor clean. Demonstrate to the world there is “No Better Friend — No Worse Enemy” than a US Marine. There are good reasons why the Military Times called Mattis the “most revered Marine general in at least a generation.” Trump has made an excellent choice.

And it's not just French. Mattis's reputation within the military community is first-rate all the way, not only for his strategic acumen but also for his gift for expressing himself in ways that anyone can appreciate:
Mattis is a revered figure in the Marine Corps and known for his distrust of Iran. The Washington Post and CNN reported earlier that Trump had chosen Mattis, but Trump spokesman Jason Miller said earlier on Twitter that "no decision has been made yet with regard to Secretary of Defense." While the nomination of the 66-year-old Mattis would likely be popular among U.S. forces, it would have to clear a bureaucratic hurdle. Because he retired only in 2013, Mattis would need the U.S. Congress to waive a requirement that a defense secretary be a civilian for at least seven years before taking the top job at the Pentagon. His impressive combat record, however, may deter some Senate Democrats from trying to block his nomination. Trump has described Mattis as "a true general's general." The New York real estate magnate famously asserted last year: "I know more about ISIS than the generals do." Mattis, whose past assignments include leading Central Command, which oversees U.S. military operations in the Middle East and South Asia, is known for his colorful expressions that unashamedly embrace the job of the U.S. armed forces: fighting wars. In one famous line in 2003 attributed to Mattis, the general told Marines in Iraq: "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet."

Support Canada Free Press

Donate

That last line is the sort of thing that's sure to drive the left crazy, but it's a Marine's job to do exactly what Mattis says here. And just as the appointment of Tom Price to head HHS suggests Trump meant what he said about replacing ObamaCare, the selection of Iran skeptic Mattis indicates he is very serious about dumping to awful Iran nuclear deal that is one of the worst legacies of Barack Obama and John Kerry. But as the Reuters story above indicates, Mattis does face one very serious problem in achieving confirmation. Current law says no one can serve as Secretary of Defense if he has served in the military at any time in the past seven years. Mattis has only been retired for two years. I guuess the law is designed to preserve civilian command of the Pentagon and make sure that the military is not, in essence, commanding itself. It's the kind of law that sounds good to politicians and journalists, but defies common sense. Once someone retires, he's a civilian. I'm sure Mattis has maintained relationships with former colleagues in the armed services, but so what? He'll rekindle those relationships regardless once he becomes Secretary of Defense. But the law is what it is, and it would take a special act of Congress to waive it so Mattis can serve. That sounds to me like a pretty enticing opportunity for Trump haters in the Senate to hand the new president a stinging defeat, or for Senate Democrats to wield the filibuster and dare Mitch McConnell to do something about it. They would be denying the nation an excellent Pentagon chief if they did so. And if Democrats and skeptical Republicans are really worried that Trump doesn't know enough about the military or about world affairs, why would they want to deny him the counsel and service of a man as well-qualified as James Mattis? Oh right. Because they can. Let's hope that for once they do the right thing for the country.

Subscribe

View Comments

Dan Calabrese——

Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain

Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.


Sponsored