Among my favorite emails in the last couple of days are those coming from people who say if I am willing to trust the science on Vaccines, why I do I shrug off the science on Man Made -Sorry EVIL Man made-Sorry Evil Planet polluting Polar Bear hating Climate change.
A scientist is a scientist I am told. So let me get this straight. All scientists are the same? James Hansen is with NASA. He is Al Gore's favorite Scientist. James Hansen may be at Nasa and may be a poster child for the ARMAGEDDON crowd. But just because he is at NASA doesn't make him a rocket scientist. He is not. -- James Hansen won't get you to the Moon. James Hansen won't get you to North Bay - James Hansen we are told is an expert on radiative transfer models and attempting to understand the
Venusian atmosphere. This we are told led him to the same computer codes being used to understand the Earth's atmosphere .
Hansen is best known for his research in the field of climatology. And he is Al Gore's hero. What do you know today that you may not have known yesterday. You know that James Hansen the all time darling theoretician of Evil Man Made Climate Change is an expert on Venus. If the Climate catastrophe crowd has it's way with Earth will become just like the planet Al Gore's hero is intimate with--Cold and in hospitable to human life - no humans messing with Venus -never have been never will be- No humans No Suv's No Oil Sands. He understands radiative transfer on Venus. Now I am not going to waste much time in discussing why if I trust a dude who creates a vaccine and a doctor who administers it more than I trust Captain Venus. The Climate crowd is all about creating a
giant Venus Flytrap --it's what Kyoto was about and what Copenhagen is about . The Venus Fly trap is a carnivorous plant that catches prey, usually insects. Kyoto and Copenhagen are catch basins for your wealth ...which gets put into a fed ex plane to be transferred elsewhere. It's transferring wealth from your pocket to someone who deserves it more than you. Remember all you did to accumulate your wealth was to work for it. The person who is without your wealth did not have the opportunity you had to work for it. So you are morally bound to hand your money over to them. I know what you are thinking . You're thinking that this is no different than being mugged or having your home invaded. You would be right. But these home invade aren't on crack. They're on climate
ideology, and I think I should let the cat of the climate bag at this point and point you in the direction of Copenhagen Denmark where some of our scientists and government officials will be eating cheese and drinking wine and signing away some of your current and future wealth.
The head of the United Nations climate office says richer nations must come to Copenhagen pledging funds to poorer nations to make progress on a new agreement to curb global warming this year “Finance is the key to a deal in Copenhagen,” said Yvo de Boer is the executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change-“Money, in fact, is the oil that encourages commitment and drives action,” he said in a conference call with journalists. Essentials of deal would include finance, emissions cuts by rich countries, pledges by poorer countries to reduce the rate of growth of their emissions, and a structure to monitor those commitments. In the realm of finance, a number of poorer countries are demanding that richer nations collectively pay hundreds of
billions of dollars each year to help them cope with an already changing climate.
Mr. de Boer said he had been encouraged by a call from Britain on the E.U. to contribute funds from public sources totaling about $15 billion annually.
But he said that “the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand — all industrialized countries need to provide clarity on the financial support that they are willing and able to provide,” and he stressed that “until they do that, it is impossible, or almost impossible, to expect developing countries to make significant moves either.”
Mr. de Boer acknowledged that it would be “physically impossible, under any scenario” to finalize a comprehensive climate treaty in Copenhagen. But he said the meeting of more than 190 nations “must see the end of negotiation and the beginning of technical process to work out all the details.”
Those details should be concluded during 2010, he said, so that it is ready to take effect in 2012, when parts of the Kyoto Protocol expire.-The head of the United Nations climate office said Wednesday that richer nations must pledge funds to poorer nations to make progress n a new agreement to curb global warming this year.
“Finance is the key to a deal in Copenhagen,” said Yvo de Boer , the executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, who was referring to the Danish capital where a global climate summit takes place in December. “Money, in fact, is the oil that encourages commitment and drives action,” he said in a conference call with journalists.
European Union nations are divided over whether to come forward first with a pledge of public money to unlock stalled negotiations. Mr. de Boer’s comments appeared partly aimed at pushing nations like Germany and Poland to settle differences over the matter, and to allow European leaders to put money on the table by the end of this week.
But the battle over funding within the E.U. reflects the broader difficulties in reaching agreements on what Mr. de Boer termed “four essentials” that would make up a global deal. Those essentials include finance, emissions cuts by rich countries, pledges by poorer countries to reduce the rate of growth of their emissions, and a structure to monitor those commitments.
In the realm of finance, a number of poorer countries are demanding that richer nations collectively pay hundreds of billions of dollars each year to help them cope with an already changing climate.
Mr. de Boer said he had been encouraged by a call from Britain on the E.U. to contribute funds from public sources totaling about $15 billion annually.
But he said that “the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand — all industrialized countries need to provide clarity on the financial support that they are willing and able to provide,” and he stressed that “until they do that, it is impossible, or almost impossible, to expect developing countries to make significant moves either.”
Mr. de Boer acknowledged that it would be “physically impossible, under any scenario” to finalize a comprehensive climate treaty in Copenhagen. But he said the meeting of more than 190 nations “must see the end of negotiation and the beginning of technical process to work out all the details.”
Now you might be asking yourself the question, "How much money is Canada willing to turn over under such a scheme? I don't know. You might be asking will the Canadian people be consulted before someone strokes a cheque in your behalf. You might be asking well since we have a nominally conservative government - and I say nominally conservative because their actions are always predicated on soothing the jangled nerve endings of the wombats, whippets and wing nuts who will be only to happy to tell the media that Canada is not doing its part to help mother earth. Our nominally conservative government will mother these parasites as always not wanting to risk yet another minority government or even worse loss of government - first you lose the pr war and then you lose your government. Does anyone have any clue as to how expensive it is to run a country where the government is intimidated by Suzuki Sycophants and Al Gore Groupies and Venus Fly traps?
I'm Charles Adler
And this is the Corus Radio Network
