VIDEO: Three minutes of public Hillary contradicting private Hillary

Two cheers to the Washington Post for putting this together. They've been about the biggest Hillary shills this side of CNN throughout this entire campaign, but in this case they actually did their jobs and pointed out how Hillary's public statements before certain groups contradict what she said privately to others, as demonstrated by information WikiLeaks hacked from John Podesta's e-mail account. We're mostly dealing here with trade and environmental policy here, and that's why the Post gets only two cheers. You get the sense that where they're disappointed in her, it's because they suspect she doesn't mean it when she publicly hues to more liberal positions on these issues. The biggest problem with Hillary is not how she constantly changes her positions depending on who she's talking with, although that is certainly a very big problem. The biggest problem is the positions we know she holds. Even so, this is quite something:

I apologize for making you listen to three minutes of this hectoring scold. But be warned, especially you morally vain NeverTrumpers: You're running out of ways to avoid hearing it for at least four years. Don't say you weren't warned. I couldn't help but note that one of the speeches shown was in Warren, Michigan, which was almost certainly at either the General Motors Tech Center or a UAW facility. That being the case, it's no surprise she's talking up protectionism. The auto industry has for years leaned on Michigan Democrats to support trade policies that make it difficult for foreign competitors to enter the U.S. auto market, and Hillary is not going to fail to pander to them, even as she's telling Goldman Sachs she's for open trade and open borders. Which one does she mean? Well, as always, she means whichever one benefits her. I'd say she tells the Wall Street types what they want to hear now so she can get their money, then if she becomes president she'll do the bidding of the UAW like any other Democrat. The real news here is that the Post did this at all. I guess there's someone there who takes honest journalism seriously. Either that or they're so convinced she's got it in the bag that they figured it would do no harm at this point to briefly masquerade as a real newspaper. If she and Trump were neck-and-neck in the polls, do you think the Post makes this video