“Democrats have a Nazi collaborator, literally—international financier George Soros—funding their phony grassroots organizations.” -Ann Coulter
In a 1998 interview with Steve Kroft, George Soros acknowledged forging documents and pretending to be Christian to save himself from the Nazis, for which he feels no guilt or sorrow. “I was fourteen,” Soros said. “My character was made then.” Regarding his participation in confiscating valuables from innocent Jews, and serving death camp warrants, Soros told Kroft, “It created no problem at all.” Soros has no sense that he shouldn’t be there; he felt he was a mere spectator. Soros rationalizes his behavior: “If I didn’t do it, someone else would.”
Thus, it makes perfect sense that Soros is the de facto head of the Democratic Party in America now that it is a foaming-at-the-mouth, rabid, left-wing Democratic Party. As David Horowitz and Richard Poe put it, “Soros and his Shadow Party did not invent the politics of demagoguery and racial division. They are merely practicing and expanding the politics familiar on the Democratic Left.” (The Shadow Party)There is seldom any originality among the left wing.
In 1979, Soros set up his misnamed foundation, the Open Society Institute (OSI). The OSI is the hub of the Shadow Party’s operation, doling out tens of millions every year to radical organizations to further the Soros agenda:
Richard Poe explains how Soros was able to dragoon the entire democrat party:
“The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It is a network of radicals dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive. The leader of these radicals is ... George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that control…. It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times, and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit. In 2003, Soros set up a network of privately-owned groups which acts as a shadow or mirror image of the Party. It performs all the functions we would normally expect the real Democratic Party to perform, such as shaping the Party platform, fielding candidates, running campaigns, and so forth. However, it performs these functions under the private supervision of Mr. Soros and his associates. The Shadow Party derives its power from its ability to raise huge sums of money. By controlling the Democrat purse strings, the Shadow Party can make or break any Democrat candidate by deciding whether or not to fund him. During the 2004 election cycle, the Shadow Party raised more than $300 million for Democrat candidates, prompting one of its operatives, MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser, to declare, ‘Now it’s our party. We bought it, we own it.…’”
“In his new book The Age of Fallibility, Soros writes, ‘The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.” He announced in 2003 that it is necessary to ‘puncture the bubble of American supremacy.’ Soros is working systematically to achieve that goal.
Keeping in mind that Soros will always act in ways that provide maximum benefit to Soros, what are his plans for Obama? It’s clear he found the cult leader he needed. Obama is performing correctly with his daily catastrophizing and power grabbing. Obama is giving Soros four to eight years to work in the shadows to destroy America and grab what spoils he can. Nobody knows more about how to destroy a currency than Soros. We have to question whether the peculiar short-selling patterns in the fall of 2008 and the overhyped economic “collapse” were staged to get Obama elected.
It’s astonishing that so many commentators seem genuinely confused about the real power behind the democrats. They talk about Obama’s plans as if he were some kind of normal president who just happens to be very bad at it. In reality, Obama has little sway over his own operation. All the ruminating about whether Obama will now move toward the center or modify his policies to reflect the will of the people is sophomoric. It is inexpiable to suggest that Obama has the freedom to run afoul of his boss’s orders.
“On the economic front, he is shorting the dollar in global currency markets, trying to force a devaluation. At the same time, Soros is orchestrating a nationwide movement to encourage mass immigration into the United States, and to mandate the provision of free social services to illegal immigrants. These measures alone have the potential to bankrupt the nation.”
Soros also is working to throw out our Constitution and replace it with his own version:
“In April 2005, Soros’ Open Society Institute was the primary sponsor of a conference at Yale Law School, called, ‘The Constitution in 2020.’ The conference’s task was to produce ‘a progressive vision of what the Constitution ought to be.” (Emphasis mine.) When one sees references in progressive speak about the ‘evolutionary character of constitutional law,’ they are talking about changing the Constitution to formally enshrine their policy preferences so they can avoid the messy necessity of having to win elections. (Shadow Party; Horowitz and Poe; p. 71)”’
As the left forces nationalized health care on us, we may want to consider the George Soros funded Project on Death in America. Soros is a leading promoter of the assisted suicide movement. He papers over it with tripe about compassion; in reality, the project is a push for palliative care rather than treatment for gravely ill patients.
Imagine how irked Soros must be one year into Obama’s presidency; first, his dreams of death panels implode. And as if driven by some inscrutable Constitutional mandate, the Supreme Court, in a bolt from the blue, suddenly decided to reaffirm the First Amendment.
The dreadful McCain/Feingold bill, another George Soros contrivance, was unconstitutional from the jump. Great news for John McCain, who allowed himself to be manipulated by Soros to stifle free speech. http://joytiz.com/2010/obamas-bosss-agenda-in-peril/
The democrat economic platform is entirely Soros-friendly.
‘”There is a general concern with sovereign debt,’ Soros said. ‘It is coming under suspicion and it has a political momentum because there is increasing political resistance to allowing national debt to rise.’” http://joytiz.com/2010/obamas-boss-warns-of-double-dip-recession/
Soros griped at Davos about America’s biliousness over running up massive deficits. Obama’s catastrophic budget was hauled in via heavy equipment shortly after Soros’s pro-debt directive.
Soros got his guy into the White House. Next on his docket: “Phase Three is velvet revolution. This is a term used in Eastern Europe to describe the sort of bloodless coup for which Soros is well-known in that part of the world. He has used these methods to topple regimes in many countries, such as Yugoslavia, Ukraine and the Republic of Georgia.”
“Soros’ velvet revolutions always follow the same pattern. The rebels wait for an election, then precipitate a crisis by charging voter fraud.”
How interesting that just the other day, Barack Obama made a peculiar statement during his daily whine fest about being accused of behaving like a Bolshevik.
“In my view, the farther left Soros pushes the Democrats, the more dangerous they grow. The Party is becoming more cult-like and fanatical by the day. History teaches that a fanatical minority can prevail over a moderate majority. The Bolsheviks proved that in 1917. Before our eyes, the Democratic Party is transforming into a totalitarian cult, bent on seizing power by any means necessary. This is a time for vigilance, not complacency.” http://22.214.171.124/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=2881
Too few commentators are informing the people about the dangers of Soros. Ann Coulter is one of the few willing to speak the truth about this pariah. Glenn Beck has tied Soros to the d
Democrats, but stops short of revealing much about Soros himself. The alternative media talk show hosts occasionally bandy the Soros name about, acknowledging that Soros is a bad egg, but failing warn the American people about character and ambition that is now driving the president and both houses of congress.
Thus, one of the most dangerous men in the world gets to stay below the radar. Few Americans know much about Soros. Many actually consider George Soros to be some sort of philanthropist. Soros certainly gives lots of money away. But a philanthropist acts to improve the human condition. Soros acts solely to improve the Soros condition. Despite the lofty-sounding rhetoric about an open society, Soros’s objective is to wreck the United States.
“The Shadow Party operates through deception. It uses the Democratic Party as camouflage. By posing as ordinary Democrats, Shadow Party candidates trick mainstream voters into supporting them. Their true agenda remains concealed. As Soros writes in The Age of Fallibility, ‘[T]he Democratic Party does not stand for the policies that I advocate; indeed, if it did, it could not be elected.’”
Only a small fraction of the media—often referred to as alternative—were willing to examine the actual facts about the mysterious man who became leader of the free world. Talk radio and independent bloggers became the modern version of Nazi resistors with their chain letters and ham radios.
Why is it that without the blogosphere, there would be no discussion of George Soros and his full scale attack on the United States?
Joy Tiz,Joytiz.com, has been quoted by Ann Coulter, as heard on Lou Dobbs radio, The Rusty Humphries Show, Bill Cunningham, KSFO in San Francisco, WOR in New York, Premiere Radio Networks, Air America and other major shows.
Joy was born in Chicago, long enough ago to remember when many democrats were actually normal people who were just wrong about everything. Joy holds a M.Sc. in psychology and a JD in law. Joy hosts The Joy Tiz Show Wednesdays at 2 pm Pacific/5 pm Eastern.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2017 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2017 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement