WhatFinger


Climateers just keep on truckin’

How Many Climategates Are Needed?



The nerve and audacity of climateers astonish me. No matter how many proofs are given that they are lying, they keep on going, pretending everything is okay. And followers obediently hang on, like blind men.

Support Canada Free Press


When Climategate crashed around the world like a rhino with toothache, all climateers could say was “Oh, even if the figures were fraudulent, it won’t alter the conclusions”. In itself, that was a really astounding thing to say. The other one was “Yes, but the emails were misrepresented. They really meant…” So, what will they now say, seeing as the emails have been shown to be genuine, and no-one has misrepresented them? To quote The Guardian header, 28th January: “Scientists broke rules on FOI requests”. The FOI is the Freedom of Information Act that requires, by law, that information is made available on request. The Deputy Information Minister has had to admit the University of East Anglia “breached freedom of information regulations when responding to requests for data from climate change sceptics.”

Deleted Emails

Better than that, the Climate Research Unit (CRU) admits to actually deleting many emails at the request of scientists, who knew information was being requested and were afraid to be found out! ‘The emails placed on the internet revealed that FOI requests were “not dealt with as they should have been under the legislation”.’ And ‘some of the emails showed “scientists encouraging colleagues to delete emails, apparently to prevent them showing in FOI requests”.’ There can be only one reason they were deleted – and it is an admission of fraud and collusion by the CRU and leading scientists. Of course, some tried to fudge the issue by saying that the emails were deleted by mistake (!!) or they were irrelevant. Hm. There should be an unlimited fine for this behaviour, but the investigation has been carried out more than six months after the ‘incident’ (hacking) so it cannot be punished by law. However, the FOI department will now extend time allowed and will make revisions to the law for future cases.

Government Admits Through Gritted-Teeth

This must be a major embarrassment to the UK government and to the FOI commissioners, because they are desperately trying to convince the UK public that CO2 is bad for you, and climate change is caused by humans. The emails are true, so they now have a problem explaining them away. Which they will do, just by ignoring calls for heads to roll and by carrying on giving out the same old lying ads against CO2. Meanwhile we wait for the result of the university’s own investigation. Will they make Jones the sacrificial goat, and hope it will then blow over? Or will they be honest and admit fraud and lies?

Repercussion of Lies

While we wait for the university investigation results, Climategate has had serious effects. Banks and financial institutions are pulling out from investing in carbon trading because fewer people are now interested in it. Insurance moguls have already questioned the way its work relies so much on IPCC figures and want to pull out, too. We can only hope there will be many more repercussions, so that we can at last push climateers out into the cold. The hacking itself is also being investigated, but this is almost irrelevant, because hacking into the system did not create the huge number of damning emails by scientists! And the idea that the hacker somehow changed the email wordings is now almost receded way back in the mind as an absurdity. MP Phil Willis says there MUST be some kind of sanction, even if the law cannot proceed to prosecute the CRU, “Given the seriousness of this issue.” I do not care if CRU scientists were totally fed up with being asked for data. Their supposed findings were being used to change the entire world system, and to bring in severe taxation and losses of freedom. We have every right to know every detail! A few years ago, a British law court concluded every claim by Al Gore but one was fraudulent, or in error, or was a plain lie. The only claim left standing at that time was that humans cause global warming (now changed to climate change!). But, a few months after the case, even this was proved to be fraudulent!! So, climateers have no leg to stand on whatever. We have, then, yet another blow to climate change claims. The emails were genuine and there has been a breach of the law. How many more of these facts must emerge before climateers give up, and how many of those who follow them like sheep stop bleating about CO2? Bring it on, hackers and truthful scientists! Bring down the whole house of cards, before climate bodgers ruin us entirely. Barry Napier runs christiandoctrine.com. The Global Green Agenda’, Barry Napier. Published, Petra Press, 2009. For other anti-green books by Barry Napier contact the author: barry.napier@ntlworld.com


View Comments

Guest Column Barry Napier -- Bio and Archives

Items of notes and interest from the web.


Sponsored