The British Freedom of Information Act requires filing criminal charges with six months of a request being denied. This time the ‘deniers’ are those who did not comply with requests for their data and math models. This was publicly funded research which was required to be public information. Withholding requested material was a criminal act.
This planet does not have a man-made global warming dilemma. However, humanity does have a Mann-made problem of blatant statistical larceny. The statue of limitations may allow the warmist criminals to avoid the gallows, but as long as freemen are allowed to seek truth, the warmist fate is sealed. They have committed the greatest FRAUD in all of human history.
Dr Richard Lindzen of MIT had two public debates with a renown warmist this week and the question of the Hadley CRU emails came up. Dr Lindzen was outspoken in his condemnation. The warmist claimed that since the emails were ‘private’ and ‘stolen’ it was not proper to read them. Out of professional ‘respect’ he said that he had not read the emails and could not comment.
The deaf, blind and mute monkey defense was not appreciated and should no longer be tolerated. If you chose to be uninformed on this falsification, suppression and exploitation that has been perpetrated in the name of science, then you do not deserve a place at this debate. You may defend or try to minimize the effect of this behavior, but you will no longer ignore it.
I turned my disgust to activism. I wrote a series of articles on the breech of scientific protocol and then emailed them to over 200 UK science professors and college administrators (see EAEH) with few replies. Professor Mike Hulmes of East Anglia University did send me a rebuttal to one of my statements. In an article posted Jan 6, 2010, I made the comment that “this could be the worst winter in living memory” based on forecasts by Piers Corbin.
Prof. Hulme stated that December 2009 was the worst since 1996 and January 2010 was the worst since 1987. The record cold had let up for the last week of January so Piers forecasts were wrong. The coldest winter in 24 or 13 years was hardly a lifetime.
What is common sense and statistically important is the combined two month aggregate may be the coldest two months in living memory and there are several more months of UK winter left to endure. I hope that the UK has the salt, grit, coal and gas supplies to endure what is to come. I thank Prof Hulme for his reply. He has been a clear voice of reason from the East Anglia University. I look forward to our continued debate.
This author chose to enter this greatest of human debates on the side of Geo-nuclear climate forcing. It is a daunting task to be the first to project dots and draw lines on a vast blank canvas. A task made harder by the limitations of the lack of general science knowledge and the brevity of each article. The reader should review previous material (see MFFACC) unless you have a good understanding of Physics, Chemistry and Geology.
More Dots on the Blank Canvas
As mentioned previously, we are standing on 700,000 cubic miles of fissionable material and each atomic reaction releases 2 million times the energy of a typical hydrocarbon molecule reduction. It is not sunlight or gravity that keeps this 7000 mile diameter sphere of rock boiling under our feet. The force that melts this rock is also the greatest variable in climate and so much more.
There are two great mysteries that have enormous impact on climate change and understanding. The Pacific Decadal Oscillation, Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation and Arctic Oscillation are all directly impacted by Geo-nuclear variations described in previous articles. One great force in the climate equations is the Earth’s magnetic field. This great mystery may now have a new theory.
The Earth’s magnetic field has always behaved in a random manner. The poles move in irregular motions, field strength varies constantly and occasionally disappears or reverses. In researching the structure of the Earth’s core, I found startling research on the inner core. University of Illinois researchers Xiaodong Song and Xinlei Sun have found that there is a solid inner core of crystalline iron molecules in a cubic formation (see ULUC).
Previous research had shown that this inner core was revolving faster than the Earth’s rotation. What force could overcome the resistance of the molten rock mantle and how does this relate to magnetism? Iron molecules have a natural dipole and would align as a liquid prior to crystalization. Think of the core as a 1500 mile diameter magnet spinning in a molten rock suspension.
A spinning magnet is a generator, which produces a magnetic field that varies with speed. As this enormous iron disco ball spins the field axis project thru the Earth’s surface and into space. Variations in the spin orbit cause the axis to move. But what force could cause this motion?
The energy in the ‘equal but opposite’ reaction clause of Newton’s Laws of Motion are a function of mass and the velocity squared. NASA predicts that the vast inner stellar distances can be conquered with particle beam accelerators. The high velocity particles from Geo-nuclear reactions are the only force that could propel the Earth’s core.
A simple analogy would be a rider on a merry-go-round firing a high powered projectile in random directions. The recoil and impacts would cancel any relative movement unless the projectiles were deflected. Now suppose that there is a set of turbine blades on bearings in the center of the merry-go-round. Striking the turbine blades would cause the turbine to spin at a different speed from the carriage.
High velocity particles striking crystal planes in the Earth’s core would deflect to the relative open space between the planes and this deflection would provide a force vector. More detailed discussion of this theory later, but for now, the connection to climate.
Climate is the aggregate of weather and weather is merely the visible trailing reaction of a large number of combined nuclear, geologic and cosmic forces. Magnetic field strength and orientation has a tremendous impact on solar radiation, cloud formation and the planets weather. The underlying forces for climate are at the limit of our current understanding and far beyond any human control or impact.
Mea Culpa In-Waiting
Science is seldom settled. To claim that science is settled is a sure sign of a charlatan. Even accepted science is one revelation from revision, one conflict from a corollary and one set of data from the dustbin. To claim that a change of a few parts per million of a natural atmospheric molecule could have any measurable effect on climate was the height of hubris.
The Hadley hacking exposed the serious nature of a political agenda in a charade as science. Aiding in this fraud was a duplicitous mass media, a defective peer review process and ineffectual professional societies. While we wait for the apologies from the media, the peers and the societies we can reflect on the new science debate. This attempted fraud has awakened the science community and increased the general knowledge of science, history and government.
This author has entered the debate to insure that the widest possible set of parameters is considered prior to announcing another false consensus. I have no grants, publications, stock offerings or any personal gain as motive. If, in the course of humanity’s greatest debate, I have made statements that are inaccurate or in need of clarification I will gladly submit. Truth is too noble a cause for me to ignore.
Joseph A Olson, PE
Jan 30, 2010
EAEH are “East Anglia Event Horizon”, “Nullius in Verba” and “Overcoming Climate
Inertia” articles by author, posted at Canada Free Press, Freemen Institute and cross
linked to hundreds web/blogs in a dozen languages.
MFFACC is “Motive Force for All Climate Change” by author, posted at
ClimateRealist.com
ULUC is….. news.illinois.edu/news/08/031core.html
