One of the most reflexive responses of the left to any social problem is to blame under-funded education. What the left means by this, of course, is not really education but the re-education which is the primary purpose of public education and college education in America today. The vast transfer of wealth from parents and taxpayers to the public schools and universities is one of the most regressive sorts of social tariff in our society.
America, in fact, spends more per capita on public education than almost any nation in the world
Public education from grades K through 12 gobbles up 38% of all state government spending. State and local spending on public education is more than $15,000 per pupil. Federal spending on public education was almost nonexistent a few decades ago. Now it is growing fast. America, in fact, spends more per capita on public education than almost any nation in the world. Are we getting much for that investment? Not according to test scores.
Higher education means both public universities and private universities. Taxpayers spend a lot of money to support public universities. Taxpayers, as parents footing the bill for tuition, pay a second part of the high cost of college. The cost per credit hour in the average university is about $300 or about $9,000 per college year. This expense has increased 1000% over the last decade. Americans are “investing” an enormous amount of money in the education of our children. Is this wise policy? The conventional answer has been “yes,” but in several different ways, that answer should be re-thought:
Mantra “investing in our children”
(1) The cost to taxpayers and to parents seems to have no rational limit, when the mantra “investing in our children” is recited; as a consequence, in many states – California is a perfect example – education is consuming almost everything in sight; it is not simply the first priority, but almost the only priority. Government expenditures for roads, parks, libraries, water and sanitation services, police and prisons, and fire protection serve the general welfare. Public schools and colleges, however, only serve a fraction of the population, yet all of the public is compelled to support education. When services for the general welfare suffer, should not services for special groups be scrutinized? This is even truer when not all children go to public schools, much less to college. Is it fair, to the broad minded leftist, to take money from poor families so that richer families can send their children to college? Why should the taxes of waitresses be used to subsidize the education of middle level corporate executives?
Education is increasingly ideological indoctrination
(2) Education is increasingly ideological indoctrination. That has long been true in college, but political correctness has now crept into high school, middle school, and even elementary school. The inculcation of beliefs alien to America and to its Judeo-Christian moral system diminishes the value to the rest of us of liberal arts graduates. Our viewpoint towards college education has become so wholly consumed by a false vision that otherwise sane and principled people like Sean Hannity raise money to go to the scholarship funds of children of warriors who fall in action. There is no doubt that helping these children is noble and good, but why help them by sending them…to a re-education camp? How about raising money so that these kids can start a small business, buy a home, or get private tutoring in some valuable field? We reflexively consider that a college education “broadens” us, even though the evidence is that it constricts and chokes free thinking and serious questioning. We give it value simply because so many institutions of our society have been nudged, or ordered, to give it value.
(3) Formal public education, even in the optimum state, has passed its moment of social utility. Children do need to learn basic skills like reading and mathematics, but while learning is priceless and information is power and wealth, formal education is a broken down model for encouraging the lifelong acquisition of knowledge and skills which are vital to a population which is growing older all the time but staying – if active and useful – healthier than ever before. What government ought to provide is an automat of options for all Americans to learn throughout their lives. People learn in radically different ways. Public schools promise only a very limited number of ways to learn, usually constructed around that anachronism, the classroom. Why not provide through the public and the private sector, a rich stew of learning systems and allow everyone a government voucher to learn through one of these systems? Is there much doubt that people who choose the most interesting way for them to learn will learn more easily and more joyfully? These people might well acquire that priceless gift of a lifelong lust for learning. How would we “know” if people learned? Allow – in fact, require – a competency test for everyone who sought the equivalent of a high school diploma or a college degree at any level to pass such a test. Make learning – not just jumping through hoops created by the bureaucrats of education – the goal. Then determine the success of learning through standardized tests which any American would be allowed to take regardless of how many classes or courses he had attended.
What we need is an accountable, diverse, market-driven system available to children and to adults of all ages so that we are motivated to learn and to keep learning all our life. What is the best hope for Social Security entitlement stability? Create a system in which those near retirement can learn to do a job that they love, which allows them to contribute rather than consume, and which keeps them active and healthy. The best hope for our kids is to allow them to fall in love with learning. If we re-think, and truly re-form education, many social problems will melt away and the future of all Americans will be much brighter.
