Benghazi Balderdash!

With every new revelation about the attack in Benghazi, it is readily apparent that the American people and the world at large have been lied to consistently. President Obama, a/k/a ‘Obama been Lying,’ White House Press Secretary, Jay Carney, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, U. S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, and Sunday Morning Talk Show rodent and Presidential adviser, David Axelrod have conducted a coordinated, full court press to obstruct the truth and justice for the families of the four Americans who died that fateful day of 9/11/12.

There have been many unanswered questions, but there are several ‘challenging’ questions that have not been asked. These additional questions tend to lend themselves to being conspiratorial in nature, but please keep an open mind. Why did this pentagon of liars press their lies, even as overwhelming evidence was becoming available to refute their lies? Why were these lies trotted out to the mental midgets who watch David Letterman and pressed upon the White House Press Corps and delegates to the U. N.? Based upon all accounts, the YouTube video had been viewed only a few times before being used as the foil for protecting the truth of the Benghazi attack from becoming common knowledge. How is it that the President and his phalanx of liars knew about this obscure video? How is it that they were able to interject this video into their con game of the American people so quickly? Don’t these questions lead you to believe that they had a lead story in place, prior to the attack? If this is true, doesn’t this mean they had prior knowledge of the attack?

---

If you answered ‘Yes’ to the questions above, doesn’t this lead you to believe that the attack may have been planned within U. S. circles, and was not a surprise to those at the very highest echelons of this regime? If it wasn’t a surprise, then what was the intended purpose of an attack upon the U. S. Ambassador to Libya? With the President immersed in the first real, competitive election of his political career, did he and his advisers panic because their Modus Operandi of running off or marginalizing his opponents isn’t working in this race? Was this to be an ‘October Surprise’ opportunity designed to catapult the President into a second term? The fact that security was gutted and, when enhanced security was requested, it was denied, does this not reveal malice of forethought? If an attack was pre-planned, what was the objective of the attack? Was the objective to have someone of distinction taken hostage, or was it more nefarious? If having someone taken hostage was the objective, was this to provide the President with an opportunity to ‘negotiate’ for the release of a hostage to steal the election through this chicanery? If taking a hostage was the game plan, was this plan hindered when the unassigned security guards, Doherty and Woods, reflexively acted to the attack in an attempt to fight off the attackers and save the Ambassador? If more nefarious, why was Ambassador Stevens targeted? If Ambassador Stevens was a target from within our government, why was he a target? What did he know? What had he done, or what was he about to do? Were the sensitive documents allowed to be stolen to cover-up possible ties to the attack by people within our government? If the attack was premeditated, is this why the FBI was delayed from arriving at the scene(s) to process the scene(s) for evidence of the attack and to allow the terrorists to flee for their lives? If premeditated, can those responsible for coordinating the attack be held criminally responsible for their actions? Is the reason the President is so intent upon finding those who were involved in the deaths of our four fellow Americans because he and his handlers must snuff them out so that the truth dies with them? Is the reason the President did not alter his campaign and fundraising schedule, other than to welcome home the four fallen Americans, was to deflect suspicion and to project a normalcy of actions upon the U. S. citizen/taxpayer and the world at large? Wasn’t there an unseemly cavalier attitude to the loss of four American lives during the initial two weeks following the attack, and an air of desperation by those who lied during the initial two weeks since damning facts have continually been made public? As unfortunate as the deaths of these four Americans are, is God using this tragedy as His divine intervention upon us, casting a spotlight upon possible terrorist and treasonous actions of those atop our government and potentially responsible for these deaths? Will this tragedy finally expose the President for the liar he is, opening the eyes of undecided voters and committed voters for the President, slamming the door upon a second term? The longer the President and his phalanx of liars lie about this egregious and deadly assault, the bigger and the greater number of lies is needed to hide the original salvo of lies. These are difficult questions to ask, especially of our President and leaders within his administration, but not asking them seems to be potentially sweeping the truth under the rug? Sadly, the Goebbels media considers the pursuit of the truth and exposing it to be a conflict of interest with the new age agenda of supporting the Communist agenda of the political Left. Yes, these questions smack of conspiracy, but what hasn’t the President done or said that doesn’t make his actions and words suspect? The President rode into office on the red carpet of Communism, due, in large part, to the Goebbels media refusing to vet him, his history, his policies and his agenda. With twelve days before Election Day 2012, shouldn’t every question possible be asked to arrive at the truth on this issue? Four fellow Americans were assassinated on the eleventh ‘anniversary’ of 9/11; don’t their families and loved ones deserve the truth, regardless of where it takes us?