One of the delightful things about the global warming advocates is that they all seem to be on the same page, changing their arguments in synch so as to move the conversation into a different place. It’s so Orwellian, and I hate to keep using the same reference, but there just isn’t a better one.
The latest moves have included the incessant change of subject from Global Warming to Climate Change. This is a very convenient shift considering the earth has not actually warmed in fifteen years and it allows the Global Warming Nazis (GWM’s) to characterize any kind of weather as climate change.
The second strategic shift had been the beginning of demonizing the opposition. It has always been the case that opposing arguments were mocked, ridiculed and disregarded in the usual liberal fashion but the GWM’s have taken it to another level.
It now appears to be an offence to criticize the ‘science ‘ of ‘climate change’. Simply stating their flawed evidence has not worked and skepticism grows. Now, seething anger is being revealed and because the stakes are so great opposition must be silenced, by law if necessary, to save the planet.
This can be seen by the appearance of Duncan Stewart on RTE radio, the national broadcaster in Ireland. According to Raheem Kassam writing for Breitbart London, Stewart broke down live on air Monday morning, refusing to discuss the topic of climate change unless he was given 10 minutes of unopposed airtime to speak about the issue.
Host Shane Coleman explained as what became the 18-minute segment began that Stewart was quitting RTE employment because of its bias on the global warming issue. Stewart then insisted that global warming was proven science and when Coleman tried to challenge things he said, Stewart went into a tirade about not having enough time to speak and threatening to walk out if he didn’t get his 10 minutes.
Stewart ranted:
"How much time have I got? Tell me how much I've got! I want to know. I can walk out of this studio this minute if you wish. If I've only got seven minutes, I'm not staying. It's not worth my time, I'm going to go to another station. There's plenty of people that want to hear. Give me ten minutes or I'm not staying in the studio".
The station should have let him walk but they caved after a couple of minutes of this with Coleman very reasonably and politely resisting. Not only did this GWN get his way but apparently he was actually angling for free electioneering time as he contradicted himself on whether he would be running for office.
Stewart, tripping on his own words said: "I have three or four options at the moment, and I will make a decision in the coming days whether I do or don't [go into politics]. I know it's going to be dirty, I know people are going to knock me and going to judge me. Believe me, nothing's going to hold me back when I get to Europe. [Getting elected] is a simple matter".
So his statements slowly concede that in fact he plans to run for the European Parliament in May, meaning he had bullied his way into some free coverage no doubt for the purpose of advancing his personal agenda. In fact Coleman couldn’t have said it better: "All this stuff... I have to put it to you, sounds like a most cynical, opportunistic attempt to just ride a storm of controversy to get elected to the European Parliament".
Now some might take exception at the term Nazi to describe a man like this. I do not! Nazi’s, like communists, take power by force and rule just as forcefully. The state’s position is then considered gospel and their opponents suffer severe consequences.
The difference between the two is that communists set up a perpetual system designed to keep an aristocracy in charge. Nazi’s are more about an individual forcing their way to the top of a previously open society and instituting dictatorial rule. The American Democrats, as a whole, appear to have employed a hybrid of these two systems.
Global warming is losing credibility fast because, despite the claims of its proponents, the facts are not supporting it. People being proved wrong become desperate and the ramifications for the ultimate rejection of climate change fiction is the entire credibility of lefties, liberals and progressives the world over.
It is not surprising then to see the level of hostility that is now emerging, but if truth is to prevail then those that cling to it must hold fast and stare down the lies once and for all so that all the mammoth waste associated with this can be done away with.
