WhatFinger


Every Donk for himself

Panicky Democrats abandoning Obama on key issues



Intellectual honesty compels me to point out here that second-term presidents usually have this problem as they approach the mid-term elections at the end of their sixth year. Even Ronald Reagan lost the Senate in 1986, and George W. Bush lost both houses of Congress in 2006. Bill Clinton did a little better but then he had already lost his hold on Congress four years earlier, so he didn't have as far to fall.
That said, Barack Obama seems unusually toxic in 2014 because his approach to governing - especially in his first two years - has been to shove as much left-wing nonsense down the throats of the American public as he could, then make excuses and try to blame Republicans when the policies don't work out as he and his Democrat allies claimed they would. Democrats will play that game until they personally have to face the voters, since they have as much disdain for the electorate as Obama. But as soon as the hot lights are on them, they scurry like rats:

Support Canada Free Press


It is a common election-year posture for lawmakers from the same party as the sitting president, especially one whose popularity has waned, as Mr. Obama's has. But Democrats' recent moves to demonstrate their independence are forcing Mr. Obama to compromise on an agenda already largely opposed by Republicans. And it comes at a point in his presidency when time is running short to accomplish his goals. In the past week, Democrats have diverged from the White House over its insistence that the cost of extending certain tax breaks due to expire should be offset with tax increases and other measures, so as not to add to the deficit. Other Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, expressed opposition to one of Mr. Obama's judicial nominees. Mr. Reid and more than 40 Democratic senators also signed a letter to the administration voicing concern about its preliminary decision to exempt South Korea from a trade-policing mechanism. "This is part of the Catch-22 about second terms: Members want to get re-elected, and the president wants to have his agenda. Those don't always sync," said Chris Kofinis, a Democratic strategist and former chief of staff to Sen. Joe Manchin (D., W.Va.).
Opposing judicial appointments, many of which no one has ever heard of, seems an especially striking indication that Democrats aren't just diverging from Obama on a few troubling issues. They're actually looking for excuses to pick fights with him, so they can tell voters in their states/districts that they're not Obama toadies. Senator Blah Blah is anticipating the Republican attacks about the "Obama/Blah Blah agenda," so he seeks to blunt it now by taking steps that will allow him to say, "Oh yeah? I opposed his judge pick! Senator Blah Blah is nobody's toady!" But all you need to know is that the Democratic Party is the party of big government, and they all share the goal of expanding government as much as possible so more and more people are dependent on government for some major need in their lives. Regardless of whether this or that legislator sided with Obama on this or that application of the philosophy, they all still share the philosophy. Republicans don't always do a good job of countering this impulse - not by a long shot - but the first step in solving any problem is to remove the people determined not to see it solved. And it's not hard to identify who those people are.


View Comments

Dan Calabrese -- Bio and Archives

Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain

Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.


Sponsored