By Robert Laurie ——Bio and Archives--July 29, 2014
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
He had just helped pull three bodies from the rubble when he saw it there in dawn's first light, standing in a sea of debris. A heavenly symbol in a hellish setting. A cross. Exhausted and traumatized by his labors, the man dropped to his knees in tears. "It was a sign,'' Frank Silecchia would recall, "a sign that God hadn't deserted us."
A memorial cross at the National September 11 Memorial and Museum in New York can remain at the newly-opened facility, an appeals court ruled Monday. A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit found that the cross, located at ground zero, was "a symbol of hope" and historical in nature. It did not intentionally discriminate against a group of atheists who sued to have it removed, they ruled. The court also rejected arguments the traditional Christian cross was an impermissible mingling of church and state.The decision makes it clear that the cross is as much a secular piece of history as it is a religious icon. As Circuit Judge Reena Raggi wrote in her decision:
“As a matter of law, the record compels the conclusion that appellees’ actual purpose in displaying The Cross at Ground Zero has always been secular: to recount the history of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and their aftermath.” In other words, the government shouldn't deny the existence of religion when recounting the facts of an event. As the ruling states: “Thus, the Establishment Clause is not properly construed to command that government accounts of history be devoid of religious references. Nor is a permissible secular purpose transformed into an impermissible religious one because the government makes an historical point with an artifact whose historical significance derives, in whole or in part, from its religious symbolism.”Just as a statue of Anubis in the Smithsonian would not qualify as the federal government establishing the pantheon of Egyptian Gods as a national religion, the inclusion of a cross in the 9/11 museum is not necessarily a government endorsement of Christianity. You may or may not be thrilled with the court's reasoning, but either way, the result is the same. The cross will be able to stay at the memorial, and the atheists have been sent home in defeat. David Silverman, president of the American Atheists, claims that “There are no better examples of Christian privilege and prejudice in this country than this decision," and his organization is currently deciding whether to appeal to a higher court. .....Where they would most likely lose for exactly the same reasons.
View Comments
Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com
Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.