WhatFinger


Maybe they read their own back-issues?

New York Times takes two weeks to figure out that Bush had a coalition in Iraq - issues apology



Back on September 11th, The New York Times ran a front page article about the growing drums of war in Iraq and Syria. In it, Mark Landler argued that Obama wasn't the "go it alone cowboy" that George W. Bush had been during the Iraq war. To the contrary, Obama was doing his best to surround himself with military "partners" - something, the paper claimed, Bush hadn't bothered to do.
As they reported at the time:
“Unlike Mr. Bush in the Iraq war, Mr. Obama has sought to surround the United States with partners.”
Obviously, anyone who was paying attention remembers that Bush did, in fact, build a coalition of the willing. Conservatives pounced on the Times' obvious bias but, other than a quiet correction regarding a photo credit, the paper ignored the controversy. At least, they ignored it until today. It seems that, behind the scenes, the Grey Lady was hard at work. After what must have been countless, exhausting, hours of research, the paper has come to the conclusion that their original story got it wrong. Apparently, Bush DID have a coalition! Who knew!?

Support Canada Free Press


So, they've issued one of their patented "corrections." Oops. Given the highly secretive nature of military operations during the Iraq war, one might wonder how the New York Times managed to uncover this "new" information regarding Bush's coalition. Did they do interviews with foreign leaders? Did they speak to the former President himself? From where-oh-where could this data have been gleaned? Well, thanks to the fine folks at HotAir, we know that it was easily accessible in the March 28 2003 edition of, you guessed it, the New York Times:
Who are the coalition members? According to the Bush administration and press reports, they are: Afghanistan, Albania, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Palau, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, Uganda, and Uzbekistan. Noticeably absent are major powers–France, for example–that were members of the coalition that overturned Iraq's occupation of Kuwait in 1991. … Other countries have not been named publicly but are likely members of the coalition. They include Israel, as well as several Arab states that are providing bases or other assistance to the war: Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan, Oman, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Egypt. … To what extent have non-American and non-British coalition forces joined the war effort? National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, in an op-ed on Wednesday in The Wall Street Journal, wrote that the Australian Navy is supporting coalition troops and clearing mines, Polish special forces are defending an oil platform, a Danish submarine is patrolling nearby waters, and "Czech and Slovak special chemical- and biological-weapons response forces" are standing by to respond to bio-warfare attacks. In addition, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, and the UAE have sent 8,000 troops to Kuwait in a largely symbolic effort to help defend that country. They do not have a combat role. What about other coalition members? Rice wrote that they are providing "supplies, logistical and intelligence support, basing and over-flight rights, and humanitarian and reconstruction aid."
Wow. Look at all those countries. That go it alone cowboy really put together one heck of a global consensus, didn't he? Clearly, Hillary Clinton's eloquent endorsement of military action helped. And that reminds us; We're sure the New York Times is aware, but Bush obtained Congressional approval for his actions. We're still waiting for the Obama administration to take such a drastic action...


View Comments

Robert Laurie -- Bio and Archives

Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com

Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.


Sponsored