By Robert Laurie ——Bio and Archives--February 24, 2015
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
According to people who spoke with her, when she sensed Obama was considering replacing her as chair in 2013, she began to line up supporters to suggest the move was both anti-woman and anti-Semitic. Under fire last fall for her leadership, she took Obama’s decision not to remove her then as evidence of renewed strength and said she was confident no one could get her out of the DNC before her term is over at the beginning of 2017, according to sources who’ve spoken with her.So, one of two things are at play here. Either:
A. Obama is anti-woman and anti-Semitic, but Debbie Wasserman Schultz doesn't really care. He gets a "War on Women" get-out-of-jail-free card as long as it's in her best interest. If Obama keeps her in a position of power and lucre, she won't reveal the truth.or
B. Obama isn't anti-woman or anti-Semitic, but Debbie Wasserman Schultz doesn't really care. That's the only playbook she's got and she's more than happy to unleash it - even on her own President - if she feels like her personal fortunes are threatened.Either way, the Politico's report speaks volumes about this woman's lack of integrity. It appears that our long-held suspicion is correct. These supposedly heartfelt issues represent nothing more to Debbie Wasserman Schultz than political bargaining chips. Threaten Ms. Wasserman Schultz and the knives come out. Back off, and no matter what the truth is, she'll let you slide. ...Unless you're a Republican, of course. Psssst! .....I'll just leave this here.
View Comments
Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com
Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.