The President of the United States of America, a country 350 million strong, the man who is referred to as the Leader of the Free World is afraid of the Prime Minister of Israel. Why else would he go to such lengths to prevent this man, Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of a mere 8 million people, from speaking to the American people through the Congress? If Obama is so sure that his tactics will save the free world from an Iranian atomic bomb, then Netanyahu is nothing more than an annoying pebble in his shoe.
Yet, Obama and the democratic administration are bent on portraying the Israeli Prime Minister as incompetent.
“John Kerry
sharply criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's 'judgment' on talks with Iran on its nuclear program. ‘He may have a judgment that just may not be correct here… The prime minister was profoundly forward-leaning and outspoken about the importance of invading Iraq under George W. Bush. We all know what happened with that decision.’ Kerry, while a U.S. senator, voted for the war in Iraq.” Hmmm...
And as destructive.
Susan Rice said that Netanyahu's decision to accept the invitation of House Speaker John A. Boehner to offer critical views of a potential nuclear deal with Iran shortly before the Israeli elections has "injected a degree of partisanship, which is not only unfortunate. I think it's
destructive of the fabric of the relationship." She said the relationship with Israel has “always been bipartisan. We need to keep it that way. We want it that way. I think Israel wants it that way. The American people want it that way. And when it becomes injected or infused with politics, that's a problem."
She’s
worried about politics? Mr. Netanyahu has bigger worries. "I respect the White House and the president of the United States, but on such a fateful matter, that can determine whether or not we survive, I must do everything to prevent such a great danger for Israel."
The leaders of the American nation will not be in attendance. Obama, of course. Biden the President of the Senate will be away. Elected Democrats, including Jews, will be away - boycotting Israel; as will members of the Congressional Black Caucus - boycotting Israel. Fifty Shades of BDS?
And just to be clear on his stand on Iran, Obama has said that he would veto a bipartisan bill that would impose additional sanctions on Iran. That would be King Obama, I presume?
This particular Leader of the Free World has been laying the table for his attack on Israel for some time, setting his staff on Bibi like a rabid dog -
referring to Prime Minister Netanyahu as a Chichen$hit.
During his first term, Obama bad mouthed the Israeli Prime Minister (he thought privately), when chatting with French Prime Minister Sarkozy who had said “I cannot stand him. He is a liar.” Obama reportedly replied, “You’re fed up with him, but I have to deal with him every day!”
In 2012 Obama said "We all know Bibi Netanyahu is
a pain in the #”" when discussing the conflict between the Israelis and the Arabs.
This is the President of the USA attacking the leader of the only democracy in the swamp of theocracies in the Middle East and North Africa, theocracies that scream for death to Israel and THE USA, while he cozies up to Qatar that bastion of freedom. “Qatar is accused of working 1,200 migrants to death since being awarded the World Cup in 2010 and campaigners have insisted the shocking death toll could reach 4,000 before a ball is even kicked in the Finals.”
Qatar provided safe five star lodgings for Khaled Meshaal, the head of Hamas’s political winghttp://news.nationalpost.com/2014/08/01/reportedly-out-of-gaza-in-a-luxury-hotel-will-the-war-turn-ordinary-palestinians-away-from-hamas-leader-khaled-meshaal/ during the war by Hamas against Israel this past summer.
Qatar was known, until recently, for being a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.
“For the past decade Qatar had given quiet, generous and persistent support to the Muslim Brotherhood. It had lent money, diplomatic backing and a powerful media platform not only to the mother organization, founded in Egypt in 1928, but to a range of affiliated and like-minded Islamist groups across the region. Qatar’s leaders leaned ideologically towards the Brotherhood’s conservative but centrist Islamism. They also saw its tentacular reach as a force-multiplier for their own ambitions, and wagered on
Brotherhood-style Islamism as the political wave of the Arab future.”
But the Leader of the Free World has no problem inviting the elite from Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, to
meet with him in his first White House visit. According to the Leader of the free World “the United States and Qatar have a very strong security relationship,” and are “partners with us on a whole range of security initiatives…Qatar is a strong partner in our coalition to degrade and ultimately defeat ISIL.” “Despite all the differences between the two countries, we’ve seen over and over again that their strategic security relationship trumps in importance the differences,” said Lori Plotkin Boghardt, a fellow in Gulf politics at the Washington Institute.
Well, Mr. President, show us you are right in your political acumen. Show us the facts about Qatar Mr. President. Share them with us, along with your proof of Iran’s commitment to peaceful use of atomic energy.
I, like so many others, have seen the tweets from this year's Iranian celebrations of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The Leader of the Free World
lynched in effigy, the flags of Israel the USA and Britain set afire and the faces Obama, Mr. Netanyahu and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (the leader of ISIS) used for dart practice. And I listened to "Down with Britain, Down with America, Down with Israel." But Iran is the friend of the free world.
Mr. Obama, you are the Leader of the Free World, and should be able to squash a nuisance like Bibi without dirty tricks, don’t you think? What better way than to let someone like Bibi speak to the American people and therefore the world and make a fool of himself? Let him speak and hang himself by his own petard. Unless of course, the Leader of the Free World has come to see that he has no clothes and realizes that the leader of the Jewish people is the one to stand up and point.
How embarrassing is that?
