WhatFinger

Too often, the justices are considered politicians by another name, and this lobbying campaign only helps further that misperception

How Liberals Are Trying to Intimidate Roberts Court in King v. Burwell Case


By Heritage Foundation Elizabeth Slattery——--March 4, 2015

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


On Wednesday morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in King v. Burwell, a challenge to Obamacare that could gut a core provision of the law.

In the lead up to the oral argument, many Obamacare supporters are attempting to influence the justices, particularly Chief Justice John Roberts, who cast the pivotal vote in the first challenge to Obamacare, National Federation of Independent Business v. Kathleen Sebelius. In brief, King v. Burwell deals with the Obamacare provision that authorizes premium tax credits for health insurance purchased by certain individuals through a state insurance marketplace (known as an exchange). By the letter of the statute, these tax credits are not available to those who purchase insurance through federally run exchange, but are available only to those who purchase insurance on an exchange “established by the State”. More...

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Heritage Foundation——

The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with more than 453,000 individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973,  mission is
to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.


Sponsored