Will Chief Justice Roberts Really Swear in a Complete Fraud?

On Election Day 2008, 66 million Americans overlooked or ignored the greatest political fraud ever perpetrated on the American people...

---

50 state secretaries refused to accept any responsibility for verifying the constitutional eligibility of the candidate they would certify the winner of the 2008 presidential race... The Electoral College, intended to keep exactly this sort of national tragedy from ever happening due to the growing ignorance of the average American voter, rubber stamped the fraud... Court after court, each of them charged with the single duty of providing equal justice under constitutional law without regard for race, creed or political agenda, has refused to hear the merits of numerous legal challenges demanding that Obama simply deliver his official birth records in accordance with Article II Section I of the US constitution... The leftist press, now including FOX network, has worked around the clock to bury the biggest story in US election history and label every American still concerned with the constitution, a “rightwing crackpot.” And in nine days from today, the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court will render the US Constitution moot by swearing in a Commander-in-Chief who is quite clearly ineligible for the office according to Article II Section I. The highest justice official in the land will knowingly use Abraham Lincoln’s personal bible to stand before the world and swear in a President who is entirely unqualified for the position... Has Chief Justice Roberts considered the full implications of the action he will take on January 20, 2009? At this moment in history, one man has the power to stop this monumental fraud and uphold the Constitution. That man is Chief Justice John Roberts. He can and should refuse to swear Obama into office until such time that he has delivered proof of his compliance with Article II Section I, which he has thus far spent a million dollars in legal fees refusing to do. But if you expect Roberts to do it, you had better think again... Article II Section I of the US Constitution is a very simple clause intended to guarantee the American people that no person who could have divided loyalties, can ever hold the highest office in our land. It’s a simple but very important concept and Article II Section I exists for this sole purpose. If the American people can not even trust the Chief Justice of the highest court in the land to uphold that clause, what can the people expect the highest court in the land to uphold? Yet, Chief Justice Roberts is very likely to carry out his ceremonial duty of swearing in the next President of the United States, without even considering the possibility that he is swearing in a man who does not even meet the fundamental eligibility required by the very constitution that every judge, every member of congress and every American citizen is morally and legally obligated to protect and preserve. Judge Roberts does not want to stand against 66 million American voters, no matter how ignorant and self-destructive they might be. He does not want to cause riots in the inner cities that elected this man. He does not want to void the works of state secretaries, or the Electoral College, or congress, all of whom have already ignored their duty to protect and preserve constitutional law. He does not want to force Obama supporters on his court to take a stand against their candidate. He does not want the leftist press to attack him for voiding an invalid election. He does not want to cause further division or chaos in a nation already on the brink of social and economic collapse, just to uphold the founding principles of a document so many Americans already believe to be outdated and irrelevant. Yet this is exactly what his oath of office calls upon him to do... According to Title 28, Chapter I, Part 453 of the United States Code, each Supreme Court Justice takes the following oath:

"I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God." 

So help me God... This means that without regard to the individual, his political affiliations, his economic status, his race, his religion, his popularity or his agenda, every member of the court has taken an oath to equally uphold the US Constitution and all laws which rest upon that foundation, no matter the outcome. To refuse to carry out this basic duty is a direct violation of their oath of office. And while this applies to every member of the US courts, it is particularly true for the Chief Justice, who alone must issue the oath of office to the incoming president. To issue that oath of office to a man known to be running from the truth regarding his constitutional eligibility, and potentially his national loyalties, is to fail the most fundamental test of equal justice. What is Chief Justice Roberts to do? It is wholly impossible that Roberts is not aware of Obama’s current ineligibility for the office he is about to be sworn into. Obama might become eligible, by delivering his official birth records to support his compliance with Article II Section I. But so far, he has spent a million dollars in legal fees avoiding the topic instead. If Chief Justice Roberts proceeds with administering the oath of office under these conditions, he will join the Obama camp and the Democrat Party in their efforts to defraud the American people by seating a president who has refused to adhere to constitutional requirements for the office of president. If he attempts to stop the fraud from going forward, he will undoubtedly face enormous outrage and opposition from sea to shining sea. All of it can be avoided if Obama would simply deliver his official records. But a million dollars in legals fees later, it is clear that Obama has no intention of complying with the constitutional requirements of the office he seeks. One of two things will happen over the next nine days. Either Justice Roberts will uphold his oath of office by requiring Obama, like any other presidential candidate, to meet his constitutional obligations for office, or he won’t... The American people MUST understand that if Article II Section I of the constitution is to be ignored for sake of political expediency, - then all of the powers and rights enumerated in that document and taken for granted by every American are null and void, for the sake of political expediency. The future of the free republic rests on this set of insane circumstances. The American people will emerge from the next nine days with their constitution intact, or they will wake up on January 20th in a country they have never known. The next nine days are critical to the survival of constitutional law and the free republic as it has existed for more than 230 years. How many Americans still care? And is Justice Roberts one of them?