Canada - Guilty of Gullibility in the First Degree

Ladies and gentlemen, One of the many emails responding to yesterday’s monologue, The Only Voice I Hear is Tim's, is from a citizen of Adler Nation who happens to be married to a member of the medical profession and is now living in Australia.

---

Charles, I could not agree more with your view of the Canadian Mountain. Let me interrupt the letter writer for a moment. I talked about how a country is more than just its beautiful lakes and streams and mountains, and there has to be a mountain of values that people honour and respect. When the people who run the country - run the country down - by telling the overwhelming majority that their views are simply the ranting of uneducated and unreasonable people, which is what we are being told because most of us want someone who has engaged in cannibalism on a Greyhound bus to be confined to a mental facility or prison facility for life. We are told that our position is unreasonable. This is the kind of decision that makes most Canadians think that something terrible has happened to our own country. It makes us feel that our solid-as-a-rock Mountain of Values has now become a very volcanic, very unstable mountain that blows black ash into our faces regularly and forces us to look at the mountain in a completely different way. No longer do we revere it. We now fear it. There is no feeling of being in a free country, when there is no freedom from fear. And now back to the email from the doctor's wife in Australia.

Charles, Regardless of Vincent Lee's criminal responsibility for his act or our sympathy with mental illness, the least owed to Tim's memory and family is that he is NEVER again in a position where his illness could harm another innocent person. Why should some innocent person in the future have to test that doctor's judgment that he can be 'cured'? Even if he is mentally ill, there had to be a core of evil that could allow him to descend to those depths. I wonder if any of us take much comfort in the phrase that "the protection of the public" would be considered in the future. Tell that to the victims of all the re-offenders in Canada. Tim's parents should never have to hear Vincent Lee's name again. Instead, they know that they have been sentenced to relive this agony again each time he is considered for release. Compassion and forgiveness are well and good...but there comes a time to be tough on the perpetrator - there is not always an excuse - and not sacrifice the victims. You sound as if you have had a rough week - thank you for what you do. Adler Nation citizen in Australian outback.

Yes, it's been a bit of a rough week. Not nearly as rough for me, as for the family of Tim McLean. But one of the reasons I sounded a bit rough yesterday, was because I was trying as hard as possible to be restrained, out of respect for the event that was fresh and raw. The event being a judge rendering a verdict of not guilty of criminal responsibility, in the case of the beheading of a young Canadian named Tim McLean. To me, it felt like he had just laid down a guilty verdict on all of us. The Canadian people found guilty of allowing an elite group of experts, who do business in the legal system, telling us what is right and what is wrong. The Canadian people found guilty for allowing themselves to believe that confining a mentally ill person for life is the equivalent of condemning all people suffering from any kind of mental illness. The Canadian people found guilty for supporting a public school system where REASON is not taught and so vile arguments are presented in courts of law, and courts of public opinion go unchallenged by many members of the public who should know better, but have never been given the tools by an education system because it’s more about indoctrination than education. The Canadian people have been found guilty for allowing their country to be stolen from them by the jackals of political correctness and moral equivalence and baffle gab. Folks, I want to ask you a question. In the so-called trial held in a Canadian court room, a trial to determine whether the defendant was guilty or not guilty of murdering Tim McLean, do you know how many witnesses were called? Two. Both of them psychiatrists, who both agreed that the defendant was not criminally responsible because he was ill. None of the testimony was challenged by the Prosecution because the Prosecution agreed with the Defense on everything of substance and there was no point in challenging testimony they agreed with. So who was representing the victim’s family and the family known as the Canadian people? Were there eyewitnesses to the crime? Dozens of them. The passengers and the bus driver. Why weren't any of them called? The so-called witnesses who were called, weren't witnesses of anything. They were two doctors who talked to the accused, who under medication told a story of God and voices. We have no evidence that he is telling the truth, but we are told that he is a sick man, obviously a sick man. Jefferey Dahmer was a sick man. Charles Manson was a sick man. Paul Bernardo was a sick man. Because the man who killed Tim McLean and presumably ate his victim's eyeballs - because he was sick and is sick - the rest of us are forced to be sickened by the notion that he is saved from a permanent incarceration by his sickness, which the witnesses say can be medicated away. And so the family of Tim McLean will have to deal with a yearly review, a yearly report on their son's killer. They will spend the rest of their lives praying that psychiatrists keep on giving Vincent Li's mind a failing grade. But the system this week was all about feeling good, instead of doing good. It helped the “feel good” to not call any eyewitnesses to the crime. Eyewitness testimony of that July night, on that bus, would have left nobody feeling good. The truth of what happened does not contain a speck of “feel good” and the public would have gotten very, very angry. Instead we got two shrinks. Feel good practitioners telling us that Vincent was a good guy, had always been a good guy, had a bad night and doesn't really know what he did that night. All he knows is that he heard the voice of God telling him to kill the passenger next to him. He knew enough to buy a knife, and carry it on a bus. He knew enough to butcher a relatively small man, a vulnerable man. He doesn't really know what he did, but he knows what he was instructed to do by the voices. No need to challenge this testimony???? No, this is really as solid as the rock of Gibraltar. No one would think of challenging a doctor who deals with mental illness and has done hours and hours of interviews with a person who has murdered and cannibalized. Why isn't that the same thing as challenging every challenged person in Canada? Isn't that stigmatizing all people facing mental challenges? Do we really need to do that? The Canadian people have been found guilty of allowing their society to be hijacked by MORAL CHARLATANS ladies and gentlemen, who ride on the back of the vulnerable. And I know that from the emails I have received in the past twenty four hours from some parents dealing with their challenged children, who think that because I wanted Vincent Li locked up for life, that I want their children locked up for life, even though their children have committed no crimes at all. And it doesn't matter how often I say that, I do want to live in a country where people are judged by what they do, not by who they are. It doesn't matter. The psychiatrists and their allies in media, willing and unwilling dupes of this culture of moral equivalence, have convinced many families in this country dealing with mental illness that the best thing they can do to support their families is to support the idea that Vincent Li will be fit to live among us some day. The Canadian people, it would appear, after having been found guilty of allowing their society to slip through the cracks, are now condemned to listen to the B.S. and the baffle gab of a legal system that has redefined the meaning of justice. Justice used to be about making the guilty accountable. Today's justice makes the families of the victims feel guilty. They are told that their idea of justice is simply animal vengeance fed by blood lust. They are being told that they are in worse shape than the cannibal. See the cannibal is getting treatment in a relatively confined setting. But the families of victims and their friends aren't getting the same psychiatric medications that would alter their personalities, and so they spend much of their free time staying angry with a system that is merciful and compassionate. However, these families are condemned for never being able to appreciate that. And I know you're talking back to the radio right now, saying Chuck, who will stop the madness? Who will rescue the country from these moral lepers posing as healers and agents of ethical virtue? My answer is, ONLY YOU. Only you can take back your own country. I would encourage you to use a Ballot Box. All other means would only be surrendering to the political correct clucks who want to see you as mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging, trigger-happy philistines. I know that when you hear what happened in a Canadian court room this week, you ask yourself whether it would have gone down this way in the USA? And you know the answer whether you like it or not. It’s been a rough week for those who want to believe we are morally superior to those Americans, knowing that no U.S. Swat Team commander would have resisted pulling the trigger on a man, alone on a bus, who was starting to defile the man he killed. An American Swat Team commander who ordered his men to hold fire under such circumstances would have to face the glare of U.S. Media and would very soon be turning in his badge. In the United States, if such a crime was committed and the defendant put on trial, if the prosecutor dared to allow the defense witness to go unchallenged by a withering cross examination, and if that same American prosecutor resisted calling eyewitnesses to the crime who would testify with great detail on the brutality of the crime, that prosecutor would also be forced to turn in his keys. Should we also note for the record that such a trial in the U.S. would be a JURY trial. What an archaic concept that is? Those barbaric Americans. We, in this country, wrapped up this week. No muss, No fuss. And No Vengeance. We turned a trial about cannibalism into an Oprah Winfrey seminar, on how to be kind to a psycho who just happened to be in the wrong place, at the wrong time, hearing the wrong voices, while armed with a butcher's knife. Our country was found guilty again this week of losing its moorings. We can only hope we are not condemned to a fate where some day none of us has the courage to see what we see and to say what we truly believe. That is the only thing I fall back on, on rough days and rough weeks like this one. We still have for the most part, the right to say what we truly believe in our hearts, for now. And what I am feeling at the moment, is that many of us will look at this week as one in which the Canadian People were found guilty of Gullibility in the First degree. I'm Charles Adler on the Corus Radio Network.