Because we are now a ball-less nation of takers, “I-me’s and free-bees".
We have lost our moral codes, we have become cowards at taking and acting for right. Good over bad. It's sad.
Posted by Dave Stevenson on 01/21 at 02:59 PM | #
You are a sick, racist, piece of s***, who prefers to wallow in your idiotic alternative realities than deal with the truth. Obama is a far better man than you could ever hope to be.
Posted by AntiWacko on 01/21 at 10:50 AM | #
Your article about Obama not being able to pass a background check sounds correct. Since his current position is "Blame the Republican-In-Chief Always" (BRICA)…I propose the following. The Republicans in Congress should start referring to him as President "BRICABarack" at every opportunity. They should refer to him with that moniker constantly until he either relents or does as I suspect and really lose his cool, then the
American people can see him for what he really is, anti-American. An example of a proper use of the term could be, "There was a time when the White House was the epitome of historical/cultural relics, but is now only a building full of BRICABarack!" I know the MSM won't go along. Is there any way we can get "BRICABarack" to go viral?
Thank you for writing the truth.
Posted by Wayne G. on 01/21 at 01:43 AM | #
Who ordered all of Obama’s records sealed or made unavailable? Can anybody do that to their own records?
I would not think they could. One has the feeling that someone or some country with very deep pockets sealed them.
Why is your article not in the Washington Post or New York Times or on the open internet, not just MSN?
Posted by Phyllis on 01/20 at 09:39 PM | #
Have read your article, found it very interesting I knew those things. What I want to talk about is the Congress.
1. They're Pansy’s
2. They're Scared
3. Don’t do what they say(NEED TO IMPEACH) But they won’t
5. last they're just plain stupid.
Posted by Guest on 01/20 at 09:38 PM | #
Don't expect elected Republicans or talk show hosts to call for a background check on Obama. They think they have a chance of winning the next presidential election by supporting their own Republican ineligible candidates such as Rubio and Jindal who are not natural born citizens (born in U.S. of 2 U.S. citizen parents).
Posted by Ann on 01/20 at 04:59 PM | #
I am the OH investigator who discovered that he is using a phony CT social security number. It was issued to someone else on March 28, 1977 and I can document that with information I have obtained directly from the Social Security Administration for numbers flanking his.
Posted by Susan Daniels on 01/20 at 04:05 PM | #
Whether or not signing a new letter on gun control, if he is found to have these invalid ID, he should go.
Posted by Billy Vaughn on 01/19 at 01:08 PM | #
Obama Could Not Pass a Background Check
Posted by Alan Caruba on Jan 17, 2013 at 05:01 PM
The mainstream media has failed us and we only hope the courts will not fail us
President Barack Obama could not pass a background check if he was applying for a gun permit or a job. Why has this man been allowed to remain in office or take the oath for a second time?More...
Post a Comment on: Obama Could Not Pass a Background Check
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Next entries comments: Watergate A Non-Starter Compared To Benghazi
Previous entries comments: Wyoming Should Cut, Reprioritize Spending to Avoid Fuel Tax Hike
Note from the Editor:
This section is for comments from readers of canadafreepress.com.
Please don't assume that Canada Free Press agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand.