WhatFinger


Gary Hunt

Gary Hunt was a Professional Land Surveyor. Having been the County Surveyor for Orange County, Florida from 1974 to 1978, he began private practice in 1978 and continued as such until 1993, when events in Waco, Texas caused him to leave his business in pursuit of restoring the Constitution. In 1989, he began researching, investigating and studying history, law and events where the government was "pointing its guns in the wrong direction". He began publishing a patriot newspaper, "Outpost of Freedom", in February 1993. Since that time, he has investigated numerous occurrences, including, Waco, the Murder of Michael Hill, Ohio Militia Chaplain, Oklahoma City Bombing, and other events. He has attended the sites to investigate the events, and has reported on his investigations. He has continued to report on his findings on the Internet, as well as write articles about other current events; about the history of the Revolutionary era; and the founding documents. His Internet home page is outpost-of-freedom.com

Most Recent Articles by Gary Hunt:

Flags and Flowers Honor Veterans Every Day, Not just on a Holiday

Flags and Flowers Honor Veterans Every Day, Not just on a Holiday When I called Preston Sharp, he answered the phone. I heard the voice of a very young person. However, as the conversation ensued, I heard words of commitment, well beyond the age of the person on the other end of the line. When I met Duane Ehmer in Red Bluff, California, he handed me the business card of Preston C. Sharp. He had obtained the card when he visited Preston at a cemetery where Sharp was busy planting flags and artificial flowers (Red Carnations) on the graves of military veterans.
- Saturday, January 20, 2018

Ryan Bundy's Brilliant Opening Statement

Ryan Bundy's Brilliant Opening Statement Bret Whipple is Cliven Bundy's attorney in the current trial in Las Vegas, Whipple, in an interview with John Lamb, made some observations on Ryan Bundy's opening statement, that I will paraphrase. He said that he was impressed with Ryan's statement because it cut to the chase in common language; he had the courage to speak so calmly and so well, with the pressure on him, and in so short an amount of time. He then pointed out that the jury seemed mesmerized and that the entire courtroom was silent for a few minutes after Ryan competed his statement.
- Monday, November 20, 2017

Camp Lone Star Domestic Terrorist! Really?

Kevin "KC" Massey filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request back in October 2016. He just received a response (FOIA Response). Though only two and a little bit of a third page, it is rather interesting. You can read the whole Response, though I will give some highlights. "xxx" indicates redactions, mostly names.
- Saturday, September 2, 2017

Ryan Bundy Holds the Key

On January 26, 2016, several people, in two private vehicles were on their way to a scheduled meeting in John Day, Oregon. While in a forested area, with extremely poor, if not non-existent, cell phone coverage, they were set upon by modern day highwaymen (highwaymen were people who stopped travelers and robbed them). The driver and passengers of the second vehicle submitted to the demands of the heavily armed interlopers, at gunpoint, to leave the vehicle and sit on the side of the snow-covered roadway.
- Friday, September 1, 2017


Liberty or Laws? Justice or Despotism?

When the colonies severed their allegiance to England, in 1776, through the adoption of the Constitution in 1789, they had to have some form of law upon which to deal with matters, both criminal and civil. To do so, they adopted the Common Law of England, as it existed on July 4, 1776. This, then, became the foundation of laws upon which both the federal government and state governments began the process of developing their judicial systems.
- Monday, July 10, 2017

Independence Day 2017

July 4, 2017 - Independence Day Many, now, seek to re-declare our Independence, though they have yet to explain from who or what we are declaring Independence. Instead, perhaps, we need to address a declaration of dependence on the Constitution.
- Tuesday, July 4, 2017

Is This Legal?

In a previous article, "Freedom of the Press #13 - Sojourn to Sacramento", I explained that Federal Magistrate Brennan (Sacramento) intended for me to receive diesel therapy, and that I would provide insight into just why he chose that route. It was an expected response based upon the information that he had been provided, regarding the Sealed Order Granting Government's Request for Arrest Warrant as to Gary Hunt and Order Sealing Arrest Warrant(ECF #2017).
- Thursday, May 25, 2017

Jurisdiction Hearing

To put proper perspective on recent ongoing events leading up to my jurisdiction hearing in Portland, Oregon, on May 9, 2017, we must go back to the Order (ECF #1901) to show cause why I should not be held in contempt of Court. That Order demanded my appearance to answer the allegations made by the government. It was specific to the show cause and had nothing to do with jurisdiction.
- Monday, May 15, 2017

The Long Arm of the Law; Or Not?

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
- Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Telephonic Hearing

In my previous article, "Freedom of the Press #13 - Sojourn to Sacramento", I mentioned the telephonic hearing held on Thursday, April 6, leading to my release, just a few hours later. Prior to the hearing, it was set in stone, by Magistrate Brennan, in Sacramento, that I would not arrive in Portland until April 25. This fits the schedule for "diesel therapy" (where they run you all over the country, in a sense, punishing you for being accused of a criminal act), which would take me to Oklahoma, then to Pahrump, Nevada, and then on to Portland over a period of twenty-five days. The hearing, however, forestalled that tour of the West. What led up to that hearing is the subject of this article.
- Thursday, April 20, 2017

Sojourn to Sacramento

(Canada Free Press and Outpost of Freedom Columnist, Gary Hunt has been released from Jail and is back home safe and sound for the time being. Hunt whose exhaustive Series on American Freedom and Sovereignty chronicled the 2014 Bundy Standoff in Nevada to the 2016 Occupation of the Malheur Wildlife Refuge, had refused a judge’s order to “cease and desist writing about the trial in Oregon and had gone to name an all out FBI informants in his reporting. For that he spent the last week in jail and writes about his experience at the Sacramento County Jail.) This past Saturday, April 8, I returned home from a week long visit the Sacramento County Jail. I was in jail based upon a Warrant for my arrest for failing to appear at a show cause hearing on March 10. The Warrant and what led up to it will be the subject of a future article.
- Wednesday, April 12, 2017

"Twice Put in Jeopardy"

Of course, we must start with the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, as it is the "supreme Law of the Land. The pertinent part reads:
- Friday, March 24, 2017

"Prior Restraint"

In the previous article, though suggested in the government's Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Government's Motion For an Order to Show Cause, of February 7, 2017, it really didn't get to the heart of "Prior Restraint". So, let's get to the heart of that matter. Let's start with the law that explains the potential severity of publication of certain information, in a case similar to what the government and Judge Anna J. Brown are attempting to construct against me. Section 793 (e) of the Espionage Act was cited as the authority by which the government attempted to impose "Prior Restraint" on the New York Times for publishing what was known as the "Pentagon Papers". The Papers had been leaked to the press by a government employee who had signed a non-disclosure agreement (not just based upon a Protective Order), which precluded that employee from divulging any information protected by Section, 793 (e):
- Thursday, February 23, 2017

"Qualified Press Privilege"

In Freedom of the Press #6 - "Tilting at Windmills" - Redux, I address the jurisdictional issue that the government addressed in their Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Government's Motion For an Order to Show Cause, of February 7, 2017. Due to the length of the Supplement, and the length of #6, I chose to address two remaining issues in a subsequent post. Those two issues, Prior Restraint and Qualified Press, will be addressed in that order. From the Supplemental Memorandum:
- Thursday, February 23, 2017

"Judicial Discretion" and Tyranny

Let's review this whole situation from the beginning. After all, it has taken a month and a half to get to this point, so perhaps a refresher is in order.
- Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Collusion or Conspiracy?

On October 17, 2016, shortly after the very just verdict of "Not Guilty" was announced in the Ammon Bundy, et al, Group 1 trial, a meeting was held in the Mark O. Hatfield Federal District Courthouse. The 12 jurors, Judge Anna Brown, and a court reporter, attended the meeting. It lasted about one and a half hours.
- Sunday, February 5, 2017

Is a Misdemeanor a Crime? or, Is the Court a Crime?

Perhaps we should start with Article VI, clause 2, of the Constitution of the United States of America:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
- Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Marshall Spring & Ben

Marshall Sawyer Spring served as a Marine in Iraq with one of the defendants. He received a Purple Heart, but his honor stopped there. His and Ben's betrayal, of patriots and fellow Marines, as informants includes not only informing, but goes well beyond, as you will see.
- Tuesday, January 24, 2017

To Jury, or, Not To Jury

Though I have posted the Preamble to the Bill of Rights a number of times, people still ask if there really is a Preamble to the Bill of Rights. A preamble sets forth the purpose of the document, as the Preamble to the Constitution sets forth its purpose. It is not a part of the document, rather an explanation as to why the document was created. When Congress approved, and sent the Bill of Rights to the States, as required by Article V of the Constitution, the first paragraph explained why the Joint Resolution was passed. It states, "declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added" for the purpose of "extending the ground of public confidence in the Government." To wit:
- Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Sponsored