WhatFinger

Climate change idealists have it all wrong, as they wedded themselves to the wrong theory that global temperatures respond to the level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere

Climate/Warming Controversy


By Guest Column Roland Seguin——--November 22, 2014

Letters to the Editor | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


The United Nations International Panel on Climate Change (UN-IPCC) has produced 73 climate computer models, all of which are wrong.

Why should we masochistically keep funneling billions of tax-dollars in research funds to create more faulty models? If as they claim “the science is settled”, shouldn’t it be unnecessary for them to keep bamboozling us with more unsettled science? Why is the UN so arrogantly bossing us around and demanding our hard earned money for their dogmatic projects. Hint, 73 of 73 wrong is not a good track record to base our public infrastructure tax-dollars on. We could be preparing for warming when the real threat is cooling and it’s the cold that kills. Global temperatures have not increased for 17 years and climatologist John L Casey says the sun is causing a 30 year cold spell, his book “Dark Winter”. Climate change idealists have it all wrong, as they wedded themselves to the wrong theory that global temperatures respond to the level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This is not the case, it’s the Sun cycles that control the climate. The climate alarmists are proven wrong again as Carbon Dioxide CO2 is insignificant regarding climate change or warming, as man has added (approx 40 ppm past 17 yrs) more into the atmosphere without global temperature rise. The ambient level of CO2, a colourless odourless inert gas in our atmosphere is 400 parts per million (ppm) .04% or 1 part in 2,500. It is vital to all life in the oceans and on the planet. Further proof that CO2 is the greenest plant food of all is that Commercial Greenhouses need, add and use about 1600 ppm or 4 times more than we breath in to grow the plants strong and healthy while using less water etc. It has no detrimental effects on the greenhouse workers as the plants produce oxygen. Roland Seguin Langley, BC

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Guest Column——

Items of notes and interest from the web.


Sponsored