Barack Obama was asked, during one of the Democratic presidential debates, about his relationship with communist terrorist Bill Ayers. But the more controversial relationship was with his wife, communist terrorist Bernardine Dohrn. Both were present and hosted Obama when he launched a run for the Illinois State Senate. In effect, Ayers and Dohrn sponsored Obama’s political career. But it has now come to light that Dohrn repeatedly refused to deny credible reports that she planted a bomb at a police station that killed a law enforcement officer.
Shouldn’t Obama be asked about the reported involvement of his political associate in cold-blooded murder?
This revelation is important because the Weather Underground terrorists have long peddled the line that their bombings didn’t kill anybody, except themselves. The book flap for Ayers’ book, Fugitive Days, insists that the organization carried out “strategic, bloodless bombings, including one inside the Pentagon.” This is a Big Lie.
The ties between Dohrn and Barack and Michelle Obama may run deep. From 1984-1988, Dohrn worked at Sidley & Austin, a law firm, which is also where Obama and his wife Michelle worked and met. “For three years after law school, Michelle worked as an associate in the area of marketing and intellectual property at Chicago law firm Sidley and Austin, where she met Barack Obama,” the official Obama campaign website reports. But it says nothing about meeting or knowing Dohrn.
Ayers had told the New York Times—ironically in its edition of Sept. 11, 2001—“I feel we didn’t do enough” in those days. It looks like Dohrn shares that view. Indeed, a witness who questioned Dohrn tells AIM the onetime fugitive from justice refused to deny she planted a bomb on the window ledge of a police station in San Francisco that killed a policeman.
But she has never been held accountable for this murder.
Newspaper accounts at the time put the number of people wounded at nine. Riddled with shrapnel, Sgt. Brian V. McDonnell died two days later at San Francisco General Hospital. A memorial was held for him in February of 2007.
“Sergeant McDonnell caught the full force of the flying shrapnel, which consisted of heavy metal staples and lead bullets. As other officers tried rendering aid to the fallen sergeant, they could see that he sustained a severed neck artery wound and severe wounds to his eyes and neck,” the San Francisco Police Officers Association Journal reports.
“Officers [Ron] Martin and [Al] Arnaud, who were standing several feet from the window ledge, were knocked to the ground and sustained injuries from the flying glass,” it says. The blast caused them hearing impairment and shock. One officer was knocked to the floor unconscious, while another “suffered multiple severe wounds on his face, cheek and legs from the flying fragments of the glass.”
The original testimony about Dohrn’s involvement in this came during a hearing by the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee on October 18, 1974. On that date, FBI undercover agent Larry Grathwohl testified at length on his penetration of the Weathermen and how he learned firsthand of its violent aims on America.
Under questioning from the panel’s veteran counsel J.G. “Jay” Sourwine, Grathwohl testified that with the Weathermen, an offshoot of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), “it was no longer a question of changing the system from within. It was to destroy the system, completely destroy it, and that is what they said the first time I met them, and that is what they said the last time I was with them.”
Grathwohl also testified about a specific bombing:
“When he [Bill Ayers] returned, we had another meeting at which time—and this is the only time that any Weathermen told me about something that someone else had done—and Bill started off telling us about the need to raise the level of the struggle and for stronger leadership inside the Weathermen ‘focals’ [cells] and inside the Weatherman organization as a whole. And [what] he cited as one of the real problems was that someone like Bernardine Dohrn had to plan, develop and carry out the bombing of the police station in San Francisco, and he specifically named her as the person that committed that act.”
Grathwohl added that Ayers “said that the bomb was placed on the window ledge and he described the kind of bomb that was used to the extent of saying what kind of shrapnel was used in it.”
He was asked, “Did he say who placed the bomb on the window ledge?” He replied, “Bernardine Dohrn.”
Asked if Ayers said that he had personally witnessed Dohrn placing the bomb, Grathwohl responded, “Well, if he wasn’t there to see it, somebody who was there told him about it, because he stated it very emphatically.”
This testimony completely obliterates the notion, perpetuated by the Chicago Tribune and other media, that the bombings only killed the bombers themselves. Such propaganda is designed to play down the serious nature of the terrorist crimes and make Obama’s relationship with Ayers and Dohrn more palatable.
Grathwohl includes this conversation with Ayers in his 1976 book, Bringing Down America: An FBI Informer with the Weathermen. The park police station bombing in San Francisco was “a success,” Ayers is quoted as saying, “but it’s a shame when someone like Bernardine Dohrn has to make all the plans, make the bomb, and then place it herself. She should have to do only the planning.”
What a shame that Dohrn had to do all the dirty work. But it’s probably safe to assume that Ayers either helped her or knew about it in advance.
Grathwohl reveals that Ayers himself knew how to make bombs and didn’t care about people being killed. At one point, he says, Ayers displayed a diagram of a bomb, with dynamite and a fuse. The plan was to bomb a police station but an objection was raised that it would also destroy a nearby restaurant. “We’ll blow out the Red Barn restaurant,” Grathwohl said. “Maybe even kill a few innocent customers—and most of them are black.”
“We can’t protect all the innocent people in the world,” Ayers replied. “Some will get killed. Some of us will get killed. We have to accept that fact.”
Grathwohl says the Weather Under-ground (WUO) also considered using kidnappings and assassinations in order to bring about their communist revolution in the U.S. Possible kidnapping targets were Vice President Spiro Agnew and presidential aide Henry Kissinger.
The Monday March 8, 1982 edition of The University Daily Kansan, the student newspaper of the University of Kansas, ran a story about the campus appearance the previous Friday of Bernadine Dohrn. She declared, “Those of us who participated in the [Vietnam] anti-war movement were not drastic enough.”
Considering the testimony that she was responsible for planting the bomb in San Francisco on Feb. 16, 1970 that killed Police Sgt. Brian V. McDonnell, who caught the full force of the flying shrapnel, one wonders what would qualify as “drastic enough.”
AIM has been in contact with a witness to the events of the day of Dohrn’s 1982 appearance on the KU campus. John B. Barrett, then a third semester law student at the university, showed up at the meeting where Dohrn was speaking against the war then in El Salvador. That was at a time when a Soviet-backed insurgency was out to take over that beleaguered country. President Reagan’s determination not to let the Soviets gain one square inch of territory on his watch was instrumental in putting the kibosh on that aggression. Reagan had a policy of supporting the government of El Salvador.
As Barrett (now a practicing attorney in Goddard, Kansas) e-mailed this writer, “Using Larry Grathwohl’s testimony, and a pamphlet by ex-FBI agents, I asked Dohrn how she could condemn killing by the U.S. government when she had killed one police officer and injured others. Her response was, ‘Larry’s a pig.’ I asked about the incident at least two more times, and got the same response each time.” Through it all, as Barrett tells us, Dohrn’s two male companions tried to shout him down; Dohrn told them to let him speak.
And then this:
“DOHRN NEVER SAID THAT GRATHWOHL HAD LIED OR DENIED THAT SHE HAD PLANNED AND CARRIED OUT THE BOMBING THAT KILLED THE OFFICER IN SAN FRANCISCO [Caps in original e-mail].”
During her appearance at KU, Dohrn also alleged that the U.S. government “is the main enemy of the people of the world” and that “Resorting to violence is painful and tragic, but with a slave/master situation, something has to be done.”
Not so coincidentally, members of the SDS such as Ayers and Dohrn were becoming members of the Weather Underground and engaging in numerous bombings and other violence as the case of Charles Manson and his “family” emerged in 1969. Manson had taken a group of young people, subjected them to heavy drug use, and ordered them to commit mass murder. On the Weather Underground and their drug use, Ayers writes in his own book, Fugitive Days, “Marijuana was available everywhere—every party, every gathering, every meeting.”
Dohrn went further, praising the psychopath Manson as a true “revolutionary,” adding, “First they killed those pigs [i.e., the victims, including a pregnant movie actress], then they ate dinner in the same room with them. Then they even shoved a fork into one’s stomach. Wild.”
In her “Declaration of a State of War,” Dohrn said, “We fight in many ways. Dope is one of our weapons. The laws against marijuana mean that millions of us are outlaws long before we actually split. Guns and grass are united in the youth underground.”
The pro-Manson comments were delivered by Dohrn at a national SDS “War Council” in December of 1969. Those in attendance included SDS leader Mark Rudd, who also gave a speech. Rudd was a subject of an April 27, 2008, sympathetic article in the Washington Post about a “Columbia 68” “reunion” of SDS members and student radicals who had taken over campus buildings. Lee Bollinger, president of Columbia and a board member of the Post, delivered a welcoming address and participated in a panel discussion.
The Post article about the event neglected to mention that Rudd had been to Communist Cuba before he led the riots and the takeover of Columbia University. Rudd wrote an SDS pamphlet, titled simply Columbia, which declared that during the “occupation” of Columbia University, “It was no accident that we hung up pictures of Karl Marx and Malcom X and Che Guevara and flew red flags from the tops of two buildings.” The pamphlet concluded with a quotation from Communist Chinese mass murderer Mao Tse-Tung, “Dare to struggle, dare to win.”
Dohrn is now a Clinical Associate Professor in the Bluhm Legal Clinic at Northwestern School of Law and an adjunct faculty member of the University of Illinois/Chicago in the Department of Criminal Justice. Her curriculum vitae shows participation in several American Bar Association (ABA) events and even a Department of Justice conference. She was involved in a “Peace Studies Program” at Colgate University and served on the board of the “Peace Museum” in Chicago, an entity currently funded by the Playboy Foundation.
Most interesting, however, are her appearances at events sponsored by the Open Society Institute (OSI) of billionaire leftist George Soros. The Baltimore, Maryland branch of the OSI on May 12, 2004, hosted Dohrn at a forum on criminal justice issues and discipline in schools. In 1999, Dohrn participated in an OSI event at New York University on “families in a free society,” with a focus on welfare reform and child welfare. (Another WUO member, Linda Evans, was given a Soros grant to “increase civic participation of former prisoners.”)
An objective observer might conclude that Ayers, Dohrn and their comrades are now dedicated to creating a new student and youth movement, like the one they participated in which eventually developed into a full-blown terrorist organization that killed our fellow citizens and tried to eliminate the “Thin Blue Line” of police separating us from the criminals. In this new crusade, they not only have an inspiring leader, Barack Obama, who attracts young people with his promise of “change,” but a moneybags named Soros, who has funded causes such as rights for convicted felons and legalization of dope.
“I have very high regard for Hillary Clinton, but I think Obama has the charisma and the vision to radically reorient America in the world,” Soros told Judy Woodruff of Bloomberg Television. “I think that he has shown to be a really unusual person.”
So how do communist-backed terror bombers escape justice for their crimes and end up introducing Barack Obama to the wider world of American politics?
To answer that, one must recall the post-Watergate anti-intelligence culture that began in the Ford years and accelerated in the Carter administration, in which concern over a huge slave empire’s drive for world domination was deemed “an inordinate fear of communism,” to quote Jimmy Carter.
Roy M. Cohn, best known as chief counsel to the old McCarthy committee, captured the tenor of the times:
“During the 1970s, the American internal security and counter-intelligence community [including congressional committees investigating communism] was virtually destroyed….by a sensation-seeking national media which utilized selective “leaks” and disclosures in order to present a bizarre, distorted picture of the purpose and operations of the intelligence, counter-intelligence and internal security agencies.”
In those years, the FBI’s hands were tied by such prohibitions as being forbidden to clip news stories of subversive activities or building a file on individual subversives and terrorists. Meanwhile, the anti-intelligence lobby was going full tilt. Groups such as the communist-front National Lawyers Guild, and the pro-Marxist Institute for Policy Studies worked openly with the American Civil Liberties Union.
The Carter Justice Department prosecuted FBI agents Mark Felt (later revealed as “Deep Throat” in the Watergate case) and Edward S. Miller who were in pursuit of radicals in the Weather Underground (the renamed Weathermen) who had planted bombs not only in San Francisco but in New York, Los Angeles and in Washington at the U.S. Capitol and other federal buildings.
It was left to President Reagan to pardon the agents. He declared:
“During their long careers, Mark Felt and Edward Miller served the Federal Bureau of Investigation and our nation with great distinction. To punish them further—after 3 years of criminal prosecution proceedings— would not serve the ends of justice.
“Their convictions in the U.S. District Court, on appeal at the time I signed the pardons, grew out of their good-faith belief that their actions were necessary to preserve the security interests of our country. The record demonstrates that they acted not with criminal intent, but in the belief that they had grants of authority reaching to the highest levels of government.
“America was at war in 1972, and Messrs. Felt and Miller followed procedures they believed essential to keep the Director of the FBI, the Attorney General, and the President of the United States advised of the activities of hostile foreign powers and their collaborators in this country…”
One argument used by the defendants (and not contradicted) was that the Weather Underground was taking orders and direction from Castro’s Cuba.
Herbert Romerstein, former investigator for the House Committee on Un-American Activities and the House Internal Security Committee, has said that “What is significant today are the neo-communists—many of them are what we call red diaper babies and they came out of communist families. But they were disappointed in the Soviet Union back in the 1960’s and 1970’s and they were disappointed that the American Communist Party was so weak. So, they said they were communists and they were better communists than the American Communist Party. I think a better term for people like Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn are neo-communists. They were not party members, but they were fighting on behalf of the countries that the Soviet Union controlled or created.”
Romerstein noted that “A group of the Weathermen went down to Cuba in the so-called Venceremos Brigade, and some of them received training in terrorist activities.
“One of their instructors was named Julian Torres-Rizo. Rizo was an officer of the Cuban DGI, the intelligence service. He was assigned to work with the young Americans who were coming down ostensibly to cut sugar cane. They were really coming down for training. And we have one of Rizo’s speeches in which he says, ‘You come from a society that must be destroyed. It’s your job to destroy your society.’
“Well, Bernardine Dohrn and her cronies published Rizo’s speech and I have the copy that they published so we know what he did and what they said. And Rizo later became the Cuban Ambassador to Grenada at the time of Maurice Bishop and he was still the Cuban Ambassador when Bishop was murdered by his own comrades and finally had to leave and go back to Cuba where he became a member of the central committee of the Cuban Communist Party.
“He’s a very significant communist apparatchik and he was a tremendous influence on the Weather Underground…he helped the terrorists that were fighting against us at that time.”
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2015 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2015 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement
Close Window ExpressionEngine v2.10.1 - Build Date: 20150501 - © Copyright Notice 2003 - 2017 EllisLab, Inc. License Number: 1946-0972-4464-7746 - [email protected] Script executed in 0.0501 seconds - 19 SQL queries used