WhatFinger


History of bloodshed, terror, and incompetence that the Collectivist Left has

Treason, Eugenics, and Left-wing Lunacy


Jim ONeill image

By —— Bio and Archives August 16, 2009

Comments | Print This | Subscribe | Email Us

History of bloodshed, terror, and incompetence of the Collectivist Left"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. ...It must be fought for, protected, and handed on...or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children what it was once like in the United States when we were free." -- Ronald Reagan “I prefer the word Progressive, which has a very American meaning.” --Hillary Clinton 2007 (after being asked if she considered herself a Liberal) The Fascist/Communist Left has a history they are at pains to ignore, gloss over, and whitewash from our collective memory. They sweep their failures under the rug, and pretend that they never had anything to do with them -- and can you blame them?

History of bloodshed, terror, and incompetence that the Collectivist Left has

If I had the history of bloodshed, terror, and incompetence that the Collectivist Left has, I'd want to shove it back into a closet too. More about that later. First though -- we simply must stop believing the misinformation, propaganda, misdirection, obfuscation and outright lies that the Far-Left has spread, and is currently spreading. I'll give you a case in point. The White House is currently spreading the lie that the only reason that any mention of "senior counseling" is in the Obama-Care bill, is because a Republican, Senator Johnny Isakson (R-Georgia), insisted on it. This is typical left-wing misdirection. This is what Isakson himself, had to say about it, "The White House and others are merely attempting to deflect attention from the intense negativity caused by their unpopular policies. I never consulted with the White House in this process and had no role whatsoever in the House Democrats’ bill,” To find out the truth, go here. And how about the "doctor" at Representative Jackson Lee's town hall meeting. You know Lee -- the Congresswoman who, at one of her town hall meetings, chatted on her cellphone while a cancer survivor tried to speak to her. It turns out that the "doctor" who praised Obama-Care at Lee's town hall meeting, isn't a doctor at all. She's merely an o-bot for the Far-Left. Perhaps you've seen the picture of "doctor" Maria Isabel sitting at her Obama campaign desk, under a Che Guevara flag. The point here, is that you absolutely, positively, unequivocally, cannot trust anything that comes from the Far-Left and/or the Obama Administration. They're liars, and they have honed their skill at it to a fine sheen. So why, you might ask, isn't the MSM (main stream media) up in arms about any of this (we know why the ACLU doesn't care). The answer, of course, is that they are for the most part indoctrinated obama-ites. The media might as well be wearing invisible WWOD (What Would Obama Do) bracelets -- or more to the point: What Would Obama Have Us Do. Most of those who ply the trade these days, are pitiful excuses for "journalists." They have destroyed what was once a respected profession. "Finally...have you no shame!"

We really must insist that the left-wing take back their "gift" of swastikas and jackboots

Speaking of lies, permit me to repeat that the Nazis were a left-wing party, and Hitler was a Far-Left revolutionary of the first order. The Left will, of course, deny this. The Far-Left's modus operandi includes taking anything that they decide is no longer desirable, and foisting it upon the right-wing, whenever possible. We really must insist that the left-wing take back their "gift" of swastikas and jackboots. It's theirs, it has always been theirs, and we refuse to be hung with their albatross any longer. In order to understand the current attraction of euthanasia and eugenics to the Obama Administration, we need to explore some additional whitewashed left-wing history. There's no need to parse apart the various elements of Obama-Care, in order to ferret out references to government endorsed euthanasia. Simply look at the past history of the Left -- check out their record. The left-wing have historically been passionate supporters of eugenics. I'm not just talking about Hitler and his "Death Squads," I'm talking about the left-wing's Progressive Party, right here in the USA. It was only after WWII, and Hitler's atrocities, that the left-wing's love for eugenics went underground. They've only lately felt confident enough to bring it back out in the open air. This quote is from Jonah Goldberg's book "Liberal Fascism," "In 1934, when the [German] National Socialist government had sterilized over fifty thousand "unfit" Germans, a frustrated American eugenicist exclaimed, "The Germans are beating us at our own game." Drats. Hitler took notes from the American Left concerning eugenics. And the people who most vociferously espoused eugenics were the left-wing Progressives. Eugenics was a central plank in the left-wing Progressive platform. The left-wing will deny this, but as we know, they lie. Let me give one well known example of left-wing obfuscation, misdirection, and lies. The so called Scopes "monkey" trial took place during the decades when the left wing was passionately promoting eugenics. Eugenics includes race purification, and euthanasia. In the movie "Inherit the Wind," which is about the Scopes trial, Hollywood would have us believe that the defense attorney (played by Spencer Tracy) gallantly shone the light of reason on the backward, backwoods idiocy spouted by the (right-wing) prosecution. Well, not surprisingly, this is all left-wing hogwash. At the heart of the trial was a high-school textbook, that promoted the eugenics so dear to the leftist Progressives. The book was "A Civic Biology: Presented in Problems" by George William Hunter. The right to use this textbook in public schools is what the left-wing fought for. Let me share some excerpts from this textbook with you: "At the present time there exist upon the earth five races or varieties of man [with] the highest type of all, the Caucasians, represented by the civilized white inhabitants of Europe and America." "If the stock of domesticated animals can be improved [by natural selection], it is not unfair to ask if...future generations of men and women on the earth might not be improved by applying to them the laws of selection." "When people marry there are certain things that the individual as well as the race should demand. The most important of these is freedom from...epilepsy, and feeble-mindedness [which] are handicaps which it is not only unfair, but criminal to hand down to posterity" "If such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading. Humanity will not allow this [silly, stupid, soft-hearted humanity], but we do have the remedy...[of] preventing...the possibility of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race." Can you picture Spencer Tracy, "gallantly" declaring such things to a speechless jury? Neither could Hollywood, so we ended up with a movie version of the Scopes trial that has little to do with the truth. Typical left-wing, butt-covering nonsense -- short on truth, and long on propaganda. That's an example of the type of eugenics promoted by the left-wing Progressive Party. Connect the dots, people. The Left has historically promoted eugenics -- and that includes euthanasia. Check out any valid history, and you'll see that eugenics and the left-wing go hand in glove. Don't believe their lies. Never forget that the "health" care bill was introduced with every intention of sneaking it by a clueless American electorate -- just as they'd done with the "Cap and Trade" bill. Just how clueless do they think we are? Extremely clueless, apparently. Obama-Care, as it was originally written, was nothing but a way to destroy America as a free republic, and replace it with a repressive collectivist regime -- under the guise of compassionate concern for the disenfranchised. It's the same old Communist/Fascist song and dance -- no more, no less. Believe me, the Far-Left would love nothing better than to dispense with the whole legislative process altogether. The Far-Left hates "parliamentary procedure," and they detest the Constitution. Both of which are seen as impediments to imposing their collectivist doctrines on America. For over a century their "legal weasels" have been gnawing at the Constitution like, well, weasels. It's a testament to the wisdom and foresight of the Founding Fathers, that our Constitution has managed to withstand the Far-Left's unremitting attacks for so long. Who knows how much longer it can hold out? So what are we headed towards? I would say that there's no question that we're headed towards a fascist elite, running an Orwellian "Big Brother" socialist collective. The bulk of us will end up as worker drones supporting the collective by our labors. One of the icons of the Left is Friedrich Nietzsche, and he was a favorite author of Hitler's. Which doesn't make sense if Hitler was a right-wing reactionary, but it makes a whole lot of sense when one knows that Hitler was a Left-wing revolutionary. At any rate, here's a quote from Nietzsche that you may find of interest: "The essential characteristic of a good and healthy aristocracy [ruling elite] is... that it accepts with good conscience the sacrifice of an enormous amount of people, who, for its sake, must be pressed down and reduced to incomplete human beings, to slaves, to tools." Charming, no? One can certainly see the allure to Hitler -- a "malignant messianic narcissist," if there ever was one. But one would need to be crazy to hold such a collectivist doctrine like Nietzsche's -- right? It certainly didn't do Nietzsche any good -- he died insane. Which brings me to one final point before I wrap this article up. The Far-Left is nuts. If you're interested in the psychology behind the pathologically dysfunctional Far-Left, then you should pick up a copy of "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness," by Lyle Rossiter Jr., M.D. In his book, Rossiter points out that Liberals want the government to act in loco parentis -- in place of the parents. If the government can't act as a parent, then the liberals will settle for a Big Brother. One can find this Leftist attitude expressed as far back as the French Revolution, where children were forcibly removed from their families, and became wards of the state. The Far-Left are totally opposed to the very values and principles that made America great: individual freedom, responsibility, industriousness, self-improvement, and maturity. In their place, they vociferously champion victimhood, immaturity, narcissism, and hedonism. They want the state to take care of their every need, and they want you to pay for it. The Far-Left, via (mostly unconscious) projection and transference, sees the right-wing as possessing the very qualities that they themselves embody. This helps to explain why they "Palinize" anyone whom they deem a danger to their helpless, blameless, immature world-view. According to Rossiter,because liberals have such a skewed view of reality, history, and human nature, their personalities are pathological. They refuse to take the blame for anything, play the perennial "victim role" to the hilt, and refuse to learn from experience -- both their own experience, and that of the Collectivist Left as a whole. Rossiter puts it this way: "The faulty conceptions that lie behind these [liberal] passions cannot be viewed as mere cognitive slippage. The degree of modern liberalism's irrationality far exceeds any misunderstanding that can be attributed to faulty fact gathering, or logical error. Indeed, under careful scrutiny, liberalism's distortions of the normal ability to reason can only be understood as pathology." You can find out more about Dr. Rossiter's book here. I should add that there are a number of liberals whom I would call sane, but their proximity to the dysfunctional Far-Left does them no favors. Let me close with the following observations. The Far-Left, to a great extent, controls the media, the Senate, the House, the Presidency, and is well on its way to controlling the Judicial Branch (they certainly control the 9th Circuit). It has taken them decades of ceaseless effort to achieve this. The Far-Left has to know that in any upcoming free election, the American electorate will throw them out on their ear. Do you honestly think that they will voluntarily give up the power that they worked so long and diligently to obtain? A lesson from history comes to mind. Hitler cemented his power as a result of the Reichstag fire. This fire, which destroyed the building that housed the German Parliament, was blamed on a Communist patsy (the "wrong" type of leftist). The fact that Nazi storm troopers helped to start and spread the fire was covered up. Hitler used the fire as an excuse to enact Draconian laws, ostensibly to protect the German people. I think that we need to be prepared for a modern-day version of the Reichstag fire. Did you notice how the fascist-left did everything but throw rose petals under Iranian President Ahmadinejad's feet when he visited the U.S.? Did you notice how Iran shut down the internet when the people's uprising got too large? Perhaps you've noticed the chummy relationship between the Far-Left and Islamic radicals. I look at the SEIU and ACORN "brownshirt" thugs. I look at the current effort to stifle and silence conservative talk radio. I look at the connections between SEIU, ACORN, Apollo Alliance, and all of the other numerous hidden, and not so hidden groups. I look at the push to have ACORN "assist" in taking the 2010 census. I look at the zealous "tunnel vision" with which the Obama Administration attempted to make an insanely expensive "health" care bill, into a national law. This bill would have put an enormous amount of power in the hands of government -- and stolen it away from the hands of the people. I look at their criminal misuse of taxpayer dollars, and their blithe willingness to burden us with more taxes. I look at their almost total disregard for the colossal debt America has accumulated. I look at the way the White House has gained access to everyone's email address. I look at Obama's association with unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers, and his twenty year relationship with Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright. I look at Obama's time spent as a community organizer, and I look at their "bible,' Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals." I look at these, and other signs, and I don't find an Obama "Reichstag fire" at all farfetched. In fact, I think it's not only possible, but probable. You might want to refresh your memory about Obama's radical roots via some videos here. Imagine this scenario: A terrorist attack on the U.S. takes place. There may be an Islamic "patsy," or not. Regardless, the Obama Administration uses the attack as an excuse to enact wholesale repressive laws. Fox News goes off the air. The internet, newspapers, and radio programs are all shut down -- except for propaganda outlets, of course. And on it goes... Too farfetched? Too "out there"? Boy, I hope so. I'd love nothing more than to be proven a "Chicken Little" about this. But the Far-Left's history, pathological psychology, and their "the end justifies the means" attitude, cause me to suspect the worst. All of which leads me to ask this question: Would it be better to take care of the situation that we find ourselves in, before the "Reichstag fire," or after? You need to ask yourself this: Have certain individuals in Congress and in the Judicial and Legislative branches of government, provided sufficient evidence to justify their being brought to trial for treason against the United States, during a time of war? I'm not just talking about the Obama Administration, but also every one of the arrogant Capitol Hill crooks, cranks, and clowns, such as "House Madame" Pelosi, Barbara "Call Me Senator" Boxer, and Barney "Trust Me!" Franks. Yes, I realize that the Republican Party is not pure as the driven snow, but they're not the ones currently running the show in Washington D.C. Does criminally irresponsible mismanagement of public funds, disregard for the Constitution, and attempts to rob the American people of their freedom, prove sufficient grounds for legal action to be taken? I think so, and I suggest that we take action, before the "Reichstag fire." Will such an action precipitate a civil war? No doubt. The Communist/Fascist o-bots will come out of the woodwork, and there will be violence and bloodshed. This is a situation that calls for sincere prayers, requesting strength, courage, and guidance. But when given the choice between bloodshed, or meekly submitting to the destruction of America as a free republic, then I personally have no choice but to say "Bring it on." So be it, I can do no less. I only hope that there are enough patriotic Americans still left in positions of power, who are clear-sighted enough, and courageous enough, to do what needs to be done. While they still can.



Jim ONeill -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Born June 4, 1951 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Served in the U.S. Navy from 1970-1974 in both UDT-21 (Underwater Demolition Team) and SEAL Team Two.  Worked as a commercial diver in the waters off of Scotland, India, and the United States.  Worked overseas in the Merchant Marines.  While attending the University of South Florida as a journalism student in 1998 was presented with the “Carol Burnett/University of Hawaii AEJMC Research in Journalism Ethics Award,” 1st place undergraduate division.  (The annual contest was set up by Carol Burnett with money she won from successfully suing a national newspaper for libel).  Awarded US Army, US Navy, South African, and Russian jump wings.  Graduate of NOLS (National Outdoor Leadership School, 1970).  Member of Mensa, China Post #1, and lifetime member of the NRA and UDT/SEAL Association.


Sponsored