By Timothy Birdnow ——Bio and Archives--May 24, 2016
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
"In this aeon the emphasis is on the self or will, not on anything external such as gods and priests."Does this sound familiar? Isn't this exactly what the left is doing by promoting transgenderism? Of course, Crowley was echoing the sentiments of Frederic Nietzsche, who believed Mankind could essentially transform themselves into gods if they stiffened their will. It should be pointed out that Crowley was a Plymouth-born Puritan who rejected his faith. Strange; the places where Puritans lived - who were extreme killjoys who thought everything was sinful - are today the most leftist parts of America, the most libertine and degenerate. The Puritans rejected a loving God for a fierce judge and their children rejected them. Now many of those children are in the service of the Enemy.
"Sex' is as important as eating or drinking and we ought to allow the one appetite to be satisfied with as little restraint or false modesty as the other."Which is unquestionably the goal of modern Liberals. Aldous Huxley understood that, which is why sex in his dystopia "Brave New World" was as commonplace as using the bathroom - and was spiritually and psychologically destructive. Huxley understood that the goal of a desacralized sex would turn people into hunk of meat, mere things. Making people into things is a vital component of Leftism, which seeks to transform the world into a tyranny of "philosopher king" style elites. People have to be broken, much like a horse, and willing to accept the saddle and bridle. Sex is a huge part of this mission, and it is done by opening the sexual spigot and pouring out the spiritual essence. The Family - the fundamental social unit - will thus be destroyed. We've seen that with the modern "blended family" and it will only accelerate as free wheeling sex becomes the norm, and as sexual roles are mixed together. De Sade also said:
"Never lose sight of the fact that all human felicity lies in man's imagination, and that he cannot think to attain it unless he heeds all his caprices. The most fortunate of persons is he who has the most means to satisfy his vagaries."And
"I assumed that everything must yield to me, that the entire universe had to flatter my whims, and that I had the right to satisfy them at will."also
"You say that my way of thinking cannot be tolerated? What of it? The man who alters his way of thinking to suit othere is a fool. My way of thinking is the result of my reflections. It is part of my inner being, the way I am made. I do not contradict them, and would not even if I wished to. For my system, which you disapprove of is also my greatest comfort in life, the source of all my happiness -it means more to me than my life itself."In point of fact De Sade had a profound influence on many later thinkers, including Jean Paul Sartre and Sigmund Freud, Picasso, Salvador Dali, even Alfred Hitchcock and was the father of the "Free Love" movement, the harlot mother of the Sexual Revolution. De Sade had some other gems. He stated;
"All universal moral principles are idle fancies."As Francois Du Plesse Gray, De Sade's biographer noted:
"More horrifying were the attempts to desecrate the Host in sexual acts. One prostitute was forced to listen to Sade’s frenzied arguments against the existence of God over the course of a long night. As news got out, Sade became a hate figure for the press, and was found guilty by public opinion. [...] Sade’s distress at his confinement, combined with his sense of entitlement, sexual peculiarities, hatred of religion and an obsession with numerology, gave rise to his precisely ordered fantasies of lust, omnipotence, cruelty and revenge – fantasies that some argue prefigure Nazism. [...] In many ways, Sade was a startlingly modern thinker. He despised the notion that women were merely vessels for procreation and celebrated their orgasmic potential. His laying bare of institutional misogyny made him a paradoxical hero for some feminists. Angela Carter wrote a book on him called The Sadeian Woman. Sade’s notions about the ungovernable violence lying at the core of civilised society, prefigured psychoanalysis (Sade himself does seem stuck at Freud’s anal phase of development). The rise of the internet troll bears out his most pessimistic thoughts about the veneer of public civility, though Sade at least was never afraid to have his name associated with his vilest imaginings"De Sade was also a virulent hater of the Jews, it should be pointed out, and yet both De Sade and his Mini Me Leopold von Sacher-Masoch would be ardent advocates of Women's rights, something that, in my view, had nothing at all to do with rights but rather with twisting both men and women into deformed shapes, changing the fundamental relationship between men and women and destroying the traditional sexual roles. (To beat or be beaten by one's lover is not a natural act.) Of course, if one sees oneself as a god, then it is not just permissible, nay it is absolutely necessary, that you rebel against norms and standards of conduct. You have to establish your own, lest you not be the self-willed deity that you have coronated yourself to be. Historian Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn argues in Leftism: From de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Marcuse that De Sade is, in many ways, the father of the modern era, a most influential force in the creation of the dystopic world in which we live-In many ways he's right. This ties directly to the Potty Peril argument about transvestites using women's bathrooms; it is about a fundamental redefinition of who we are as a People, what we believe, and where we are taking our society. So what's the point? As the Bible says "God made them male and female" and "...the effeminate... shall not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven" but our modern Liberal masters now deny this, and worse, impose it on our persons. There is little in this world more private than the restroom, and assaults of concepts of sexual identity and modesty - the keys to a healthy sexuality - are intended not to promote freedom but to create chaos both outside and within the individual. This is the revenge of the Pagan and the Satanist. It is clearly intentional, too. Part of the Progressive strategy is to use the techniques employed by the military and by cults to brainwash the public, and they have had a large measure of success. The military uses psychological techniques to reprogram recruits to get them to act in ways counterintuitive of nature. These techniques include verbal abuse, isolation, changes in appearance, physical and psychological distractions, dietary manipulation, and attacks from multiple directions. Cults use these tactics, too, and often impose a sexual component; the Moonies marry off their neophytes to strangers, often ones who do not even speak the same language. As psychological warfare goes, nudity and shame have a powerful impact, and the violation of the bathroom, the locker room, the shower and general modesty is intentional. The Left verbally abuses any who disagree with them. The liberals push anything that breaks the bonds of family and culture; the so-called "generation gap" was an artificial construct, with the Progressives promoting alternative music and culture as a way to split children from their parents (we know it was artificial; the Payolla Scandals, where radio stations were being paid to play rock music, shows how important this new generational split was to some wealthy people.) You have multiculturalism, which isolates the mainstream, indeed, makes it where there is no mainstream. You have radical changes in fashion, in hair styles, etc. that are promoted in the pop culture. Tattoos, body piercings etc. Mrs. Obama's "let's move" campaign is an example of an effort to get people over involved in athletics and exercise, and when they aren't running about they are busy wearing their thumbs to the nub with texting. Of course there has been a huge push to fundamentally transform the American diet. Mo has the kids in schools eating swill barnyard pigs would reject. And the last? Transgenderism is just one of many attacks from multiple directions, all at once, all aimed at making us despair and surrender our will. So does everyone finally understand why it is so important to that we should be willing to die on this hill? This is a full frontal assault by neopagans and atheists, with the ultimate intention of destroying our fundamental beliefs and way of life, with the purpose of crushing will to resist them. Yes it is worth the fight. If it weren't, why would the Progressives be fighting it? They know it is important otherwise THEY would be unwilling to die on this hill. They have pulled in their horns in the past; Hillarycare, women in combat, gays in the military, etc. and have bided their time, waiting for their chance. They have gotten most of this (and hurt America terribly in the process) as we have become less vigilant. If we push back hard enough they will withdraw. But we have to stop this nonsense of surrendering the field without a fight. This is a battle to the death for the soul of America.
View Comments
Timothy Birdnow is a conservative writer and blogger and lives in St. Louis Missouri. His work has appeared in many popular conservative publications including but not limited to The American Thinker, Pajamas Media, Intellectual Conservative and Orthodoxy Today. Tim is a featured contributor to American Daily Reviewand has appeared as a Guest Host on the Heading Right Radio Network. Tim’s website is tbirdnow.mee.nu.