By Dan Calabrese ——Bio and Archives--June 27, 2016
World News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
We can no longer think of reconciliation between the opposing views of destruction and progress. The angry old men will not be mollified, their xenophobia cannot be controlled or channeled into constructive cooperation. We, the young, the future of Europe, must push back. Too much time has been lost already.So as far as Bittner is concerned, those who don't think Britain should be part of a highly bureaucratic transnational institution are advocates of "destruction" - mere angry hold men driven by xenophobia, and Bittner has no interest in any sort of peace with them. In the Los Angeles Times, Brian Klaas and Marcel Dursus sound like they need a tissue:
We find ourselves in a moment of global fear. The democratic identities of Britain and the United States are under threat — not from immigrants or even changing values, but from nationalists and xenophobes exploiting citizens' darkest worries with populist projects, including Donald Trump’s campaign for the U.S. presidency and Brexit. To many voters, the world is a scary place. Terrorists seem to lurk everywhere. Uncertainty surrounds us. Change is rapid and some aren't keeping up. Unsurprisingly, politicians of many stripes are capitalizing on our fears to rally voters against trade, immigration and international cooperation.Note the disdain with which they view what most of us would consider reasonable concerns. The threat of terrorism. The out-of-control push of immigration. To the left, these concerns are delusional and overwrought. And like Bittner above, Klaas and Dursus apparently think there is no real estate of any kind between "international cooperation" and "xenophobia." It's all one or all the other. And they're very disappointed in the British public - and perhaps the American public as well - for not trusting institutions like the EU to decide which concerns are valid and address them, but instead turning to the likes of Donald Trump for what might prove to be more effective solutions. Finally, you had to know you'd get a rant like this from John Oliver: The lack of perspective on all this is astonishing. Every nation has complete freedom to decide not only which alliances it will pursue with other nations, but also the nature of those alliances. I hardly think a nation that has been a leader in two world wars and all the recent battles against Islamic terrorism can be considered "isolationist" - at least in the classic meaning of the term, which refers to a nation that simply refuses to engage itself with anything happening in other parts of the world.
Support Canada Free Press
View Comments
Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain
Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.