WhatFinger

...Which means we are officially witnessing the saddest state of affairs in American political history

CNN panel: Hillary's not offering a reason to vote FOR her, just a rehash of 2012 attack campaign



There's no reason to vote for Hillary Clinton. She's offered no concrete plan to move the nation forward beyond the extraordinarily feeble idea that she'll continue to do the same things that already aren't working. Back in '08, Dems were shrieking about how McCain would represent a third term" of sorts, but now that Hillary's on the stump, that's exactly what they're offering. Never mind that only 29% of the American people think the country is headed in the right direction. If she's elected, you'll get more of the same, you'll shut your pie hole, and you'll like it. In much the same way she's incapable of identifying a single achievement, she has, so far, failed to show any legislative proposal that isn't a rehash of a predecessor's ideas.
There's no reason to vote for Hillary Clinton. She's offered no concrete plan to move the nation forward beyond the extraordinarily feeble idea that she'll continue to do the same things that already aren't working. Back in '08, Dems were shrieking about how McCain would represent a third term" of sorts, but now that Hillary's on the stump, that's exactly what they're offering. Never mind that only 29% of the American people think the country is headed in the right direction. If she's elected, you'll get more of the same, you'll shut your pie hole, and you'll like it. In much the same way she's incapable of identifying a single achievement, she has, so far, failed to show any legislative proposal that isn't a rehash of a predecessor's ideas. Since that's the case, she has to run a different kind of campaign. And guess what, that's a rehash too. As CNN notes; the Clinton machine has no concepts of its own, so it's re-running the 2012 "Kill Romney" campaign:

Saddest state of affairs in American political history

Right, and there’s a debate within Democratic circles about whether it’s enough for her to run just against him, or whether she has to also put forward her own message. It seems like her team has decided it’s actually enough at this stage in the game to run just against him. And it’s a strategy that reminds me of what happened in ’12, where Democrats moved over the summer to define Mitt Romney as this out-of-touch plutocrat. They were on the ads constantly in Ohio doing that. Democrats are trying to repeat that playbook this year with Donald Trump. It may work. It may not. I think operations matter; you get this sense that Donald Trump really sees this as a national referendum, where he can just be giving these interviews, and on Twitter. And this is, at this stage in the game, a 50-state drag out battle. You have to have the ground game; you have to have the ads in all these states. He just doesn’t have that. So, she may be able to drive this message and attack him effectively in the eight states that matter in this race.
So, that becomes the central question of the campaign: Are Trump's shortcomings going to offer Hillary enough ammo to distract from the fact that there's absolutely nothing about her worth putting in the Oval office? The answer will likely decide the November election. ...Which means we are officially witnessing the saddest state of affairs in American political history.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Robert Laurie——

Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com

Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.


Sponsored