WhatFinger

If the election confirms the media’s pre–determined bias, then THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN! If the election doesn’t go the media’s way, then who cares what a bunch of yahoos think?

Votes Are No Indication of Support When Media Is Counting


By Michael R. Shannon ——--July 28, 2016

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


We have an instructive contrast between how the mainstream media treats a candidate whose positions it supports and how it treats a candidate whose positions it loathes. MSM DonationsBoth of our candidates have remarkable similarities. They’re outsiders who parachuted into the political arena and have never previously held office. Both are scornful of the entrenched political elite and promise big changes if they’re elected. And while the net worth of the candidates varies considerably, both rely on extensive free media coverage to increase their exposure while at the same time reducing the need for expensive media budgets.
Finally, both candidates prefer rallies and crowd–generating events to the traditional grind of going door–to–door to engage the public and mobilize support. So wouldn’t an ideal test of political relevance and candidate support among the general public be the number of votes amassed on Election Day? Well yes. And no. If the election confirms the media’s pre–determined bias, then THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN! If the election doesn’t go the media’s way, then who cares what a bunch of yahoos think? Which brings us to DeRay Mckesson and Donald Trump. But to learn more about out couple, you’re going to have to get the complete story.


Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Michael R. Shannon——

Michael R. Shannon (The Whole Shebang (mostly))  is a Virginia-based public relations and media consultant with MANDATE: Message, Media & Public Relations who has worked in over 75 elections on three continents and a handful of islands.


Sponsored