A: We still don't have any actual evidence that John Podesta's hacked emails were given to Wikileaks by the Russians. There's a lot of speculation, but no proof.
B: The validity of those emails has NEVER been disputed.
C: The leaked emails did nothing more than reveal unfortunate truths about Hillary Clinton and her campaign, the ways in which the party stacked the deck against Bernie Sanders, and the extent of its ownership of the old media.
D: "Russian Hackers" did not force Hillary to ignore Michigan and Wisconsin, nor did they destroy her already horrible trust and unlikability numbers.
Pelosi thinks the "election was hacked" and nothing is going to change what's left of her mind
But don't bother telling Nancy Pelosi any of those inarguable facts. She thinks the "election was hacked" and nothing is going to change what's left of her mind. Putin destroyed Hillary for unknown reasons, and that's that.
...Oh, and by the way, the media - which (as they do every Democrat) overwhelmingly supported Hillary - was an accomplice to the effort.
Behold the textbook definition of delusion:
If Pelosi is right, the press helped rig a U.S. election. They are downright un-American.
...Anyone here old enough to remember when "attacking the credibility of the press" was supposed to be some kind of assault on the very foundations of a free and open society? Because I would have sworn that was the standard Democrat-party boilerplate.
