By Institute for Energy Research ——Bio and Archives--January 30, 2014
Global Warming-Energy-Environment | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
The goal [of the President’s Climate Action Plan] will nevertheless cost consumers in the form of increased prices for energy and anything made, grown, or transported using energy. These new costs will result in less disposable income in families’ pockets. That means less money to spend on groceries, doctor’s visits, and education. In short, low cost energy is critical to human health and welfare. For some ratepayers, like the millions of rural electric cooperative consumers in the country, coal makes up around 80% of their electricity. According to the 2009 Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, nearly 40 million American households earning less than $30,000 per year spend almost 20% of their income on energy. The most vulnerable families are those hit the hardest by bad energy policies and high utility bills.
Recent studies have predicted that the U.S. is steadily becoming one of the lowest-cost countries for manufacturing in the developed world. The study estimates that by 2015, average manufacturing costs in advanced economies such as Germany, Japan, France, Italy, and the U.K. will be up to 18% higher than in the United States.This development is driven in large measure by low-cost natural gas made possible by modern technologies. But if we fundamentally transform our energy use and ban the use of coal as the President suggests, the burden for energy supplies will fall solely on natural gas, causing demand to skyrocket, greatly increasing prices and putting a manufacturing renaissance in peril. The Europeans are starting to see that their energy policies, many of which the President wants to emulate, are making Europe uncompetitive with the United States. In the State of the Union, the President said that he has directed “my administration to work with states, utilities, and others to set new standards on the amount of carbon pollution our power plants are allowed to dump into the air.” The President wants to bypass Congress because Congress have refused time and time again to approve the type of energy-price increasing measures the President supports. The simple truth is the President’s climate and energy agenda is designed to drive up the cost of energy, as the president says, to make his favored types of energy “the profitable kind.” Thankfully, at least 21 Senators are willing to stand up the President Obama’s desire to increase energy prices on middle and low-income families.
View Comments
The Institute for Energy Research (IER) is a not-for-profit organization that conducts intensive research and analysis on the functions, operations, and government regulation of global energy markets. IER maintains that freely-functioning energy markets provide the most efficient and effective solutions to today’s global energy and environmental challenges and, as such, are critical to the well-being of individuals and society.