WhatFinger


As long as our laws are designed to be free for all and promoting social freedom, there will be a free-for-all fight from the Left (Democrats) to force their will on the country

THE HYPOCRISY HAS BEEN EXPOSED ONCE AGAIN



The Left has revealed their hypocrisy once again. They brag about being Liberal and deride the Right for being Conservative. Let’s see what those two terms mean and represent. Liberal traditional meaning is Generous. Further defined in The Free Dictionary, it means:
  1. Favoring reform, open to new ideas, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; not bound by traditional thinking; broad-minded.
  2. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism.
  3. Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States.
The political meaning has come to mean more than “favoring reform,” it has come to mean “being agreeable to change.” In fact, the Left is eager for change and will change what has been successful at the blink of an eye. However, the hypocrisy begins and ends with their desire to change the Constitution while at the same time they use that grand document as leverage as they presume to use the Constitution to argue against someone or something they do not agree with. Again, they are for it until they are against it. More “liberalism.” They want it both demand and expect it because they are Liberals. Liberal has also come to mean that the Left/Liberals are flexible. They use the idea of flexibility as a point of pride. They hint, and sometimes actually say, that they are not so hardheaded that they cannot change. They say this in contrast with the Right/Conservatives, as if this is an obvious plus to their philosophy while, at the same time, implying that being inflexible is really a negative on the side of the Right and Conservatives. But, those on the Right are not inflexible. That is another of the Left’s deceptions. Conservatives will change what needs to be changed. It is not a random thing, though. Some distinct need must be associated with it. Where improvement is called for due to a better way or new/newer system coming to the fore or because some law or action is antiquated, Conservatives are not shy about making it happen. However, if there is no well-defined improvement in the change, then it will not be eagerly brought forth as a change that must be made lest everyone suffers, as the Left is prone to do and say. Seen from the Left, because the Right is not maniacal about change as the Left is, Liberals imply that it is proof that the Right does not care about improvement in the system or society at large. This is also then used by them as a political, vote-getting ploy. Conservative has several implications: It means that Conservatives want to preserve the old landmarks, keep the old standards and this means upholding the Constitution and everything related to it. This does not mean that they are not flexible where a change is obviously needed, though. But such changes are not immediately jumped on with glee as the Left tends to do, perhaps to “prove” to their voters that their pretense of doing the right thing. For the Left, this is more smoke than fire, however.

Support Canada Free Press


Conservatives rely on standards such as laws and supporting documents and the most significant of those documents is actually the Constitution. And here is one of the most significant differences between the Left and the Right: The Right points to Documents and Laws while the Left relies on specious arguments centered on personal feelings, depending on emotion to be the strength for wanting/demanding/expecting change. The Left cites isolated instances; they refer to someone by name and relate some heart wrenching story that happened to the person. They want people to conclude that if the person in this highly-isolated incident is not seen as someone who deserves sympathy, even at the cost of all else, then this is proof of apathy and uncaring for the situations of others by Republicans, the Right and Conservatives. This is a little more than a scheme that is designed ultimately to get votes. In the process, it means in their minds that the Left will be seen by voters as always thinking about the little guy, about the minority, and not in reality about Democrats and the Party. The truth is that for the Left, the Party comes first and the country comes last, if at all, because they use the Party as a necessary tool. Conservatives are busy maintaining the status quo but are not amenable to change where this change is necessary and a definite improvement. Conservatives will not go through the motions of classic change for change’s sake that is the modus operandi of the Left. While the Left is busy creating fires with much smoke and noise, depending on the provision of Freedom of Speech as an escape, the Conservative Right is busy doing the jobs their voters sent them to Washington to do. There are exceptions to this rule but it’s most often a case of a Democrat with the Republican label commonly called a RINO (Republican in Name Only). Finally, here is where the Left’s hypocrisy is revealed: Donald Trump was elected to be president because he wanted change. He was overwhelmingly elected, disregarding the millions of illegal votes cast for his opposition, because American voters wanted change. The Democrats, the ones that didn’t vote for Trump, and the Left are now suddenly against the idea of change because it affects them. President Trump firing a person who reacted negatively to his immigration policy is part of the “draining of the swamp” that thrilled so many voters but, again, it’s one of them so the Left/Democrats are having cows over it.

Hypocrisy at its best! The Left wants change but when change hits them, and hits them hardest, they moan, spit and throw themselves in the gutter with marches, speeches and pretense in Congress of being patriotic Americans. However, this is proving to be a good thing for the Right; it won’t be necessary to ferret out the evil people on the Left who are the activists, the mass hysteria leaders and the instigators. They are revealing themselves and, in some cases, proudly so. They will end up on a list of those who are working against the president and, ultimately, against the country. Some writers are saying that this mayhem from the Left is an element of revolution. There are people who revolt against the powers that be but in this case, the powers that be are and were elected/appointed as a result of the action of legitimate American voters. Therefore, the ones revolting are going against what is legal and proper, in this case. They are then and in fact Anarchists. As such, they are unquestionably defined by a famous writer when he said: “He was inclined to anarchism; he hated system and organization and uniformity.” (Bertrand Russell). By definition, therefore, the Left, and this includes Democrats and Liberals, are Haters, when you boil it down. The only vestige of love they have is for themselves. Any regard to others, even their voters, is mere pretense. Some instances of an unknown open mike have revealed this, much to the chagrin of those exposed in this way. Another element of their hypocrisy is the idea of civility in our Congresspeople. They insist on referring to each other as “the gentleman/gentlewoman from...” and seem to follow civil decorum. However, it should be understood that this is a tradition of Congress and some of those same individuals that refers to his/her fellow Congressperson as “gentleman/gentlewoman” uses other, more down-to-earth terms when referring to them and not speaking on the floor. After President Trump started making changes as he promised for many months after he became president, now you see the Left/Democrats acting amazed and surprised. They are so accustomed to their representatives lying through their teeth when making campaign promises that they cannot handle the fact that here is a man who is going to follow through with those promises. Some so-called Republicans are also unwilling to allow their president to do what he says without comment and opposition. These RINO types are also revealing themselves for what they actually are. Talking about traditions, hypocrisy is one that has been nurtured for decades in Congress, if not nearly from the beginning. Social Engineering in its finest form. Instead of Government serving We the People, it has obviously become We the People serving the Government. Same principle of a computer that is supposed to serve us and be a useful tool for our advancement but we find ourselves being in a position of conforming to the demands of that computer IF we actually want/hope/expect it to be a tool that is useful for our benefit and advancement. The mechanism is very similar between the computer and the people in Congress, as they operate today. It’s not going to improve as long as there are people on the Left, namely Democrats, who have a voice that convinces others less knowledgeable to follow them. As long as our laws are designed to be free for all and promoting social freedom, there will be a free-for-all fight from the Left (Democrats) to force their will on the country. In this I’m reminded of a comment in the movie True Lies where the Arnie’s friend said early on in the movie: “Women! You can’t live with ‘em and you can’t kill ‘em.” In a nutshell, this defines the Left/Democrats


View Comments

Bob Lunsford -- Bio and Archives

Mr. Lunsford is a retired DoD telecommunications engineer, linguist and world traveler now living in eastern Kentucky. Still active in radio communications, he has several books copyrighted, one of which is now in final process of publication. He is politically motivated and, as much as possible, politically active.


Sponsored