By J.B. Williams
Saturday, November 18, 2006
Democrats, old and new, are celebrating their victory in the 2006 mid-term elections, a win not possible without the help of so-called Independents and angry Republicans. But Democrats are not celebrating alone and there's plenty reason for that! International Socialists and International Terrorists agree - Democrats should lead america! The election marks a victory for them as well, and they didn't hesitate to celebrate all over the third world. (No link needed, it's on every front page…) But what does it really mean?
The 2006 mid-term election results mark a dramatic turn in america's overall direction and although many who voted for this change have no idea what they just voted for, those behind the agenda, and those who will benefit most from the seismic political shift, know it well. They have been quietly working towards this day for decades.
The most obvious and notable example of this shift was written in these words, "Today, history was made when Vermont Congressman Bernie Sanders became the first self-identified socialist elected to the United States Senate. His election is a tribute to his long-standing determination to serve the citizens of Vermont—a service he has performed admirably for more than 20 years—without sacrificing his political and socialist principles. Bernie Sanders' political career and campaign are models for progressive electoral work and effective coalition building.”.
Some will say in defense, that Bernie doesn't count because he's not a Democrat. Well, Bernie calls himself a Socialist, but he operates under the guise of Independent status because he knows most americans wouldn't openly vote for a Socialist Party candidate. The Socialist Party understands this too, which is why they instead, operate largely through the Democratic Party. However, Bernie votes with and is ideologically aligned with Democrats, who share a common agenda with the US and International Socialist Party. Think not?
Those who still believe they just elected american Democrats into power need to acquaint themselves with a few new phrases (organizations), beginning with DSa (Democratic Socialist of america). In the "about Us” section of the web site, the DSa pronounces, "The Democratic Socialists of america (DSa) is the largest socialist organization in the United States, and the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. DSa's members are building progressive movements for social change while establishing an openly socialist presence in american communities and politics.” See DSa about Us.
american voters had better acquaint themselves with these organizations too, Social Democrats USa, SDUSa, and National Democratic Institute, NDI, both of which are listed as USa member organizations of Socialist International.
For those still having trouble connecting all the dots, take a moment to review the names of the NDI Board of Directors and Senior advisory Committee, which includes such well-known names as its current Chairman, former Secretary of State Madeleine K. albright. Thomas a. Daschle, Geraldine a. Ferraro, Erskine Bowles, Mark R. Warner, Walter F. Mondale, Bill Bradley, Mario M. Cuomo, Christopher J. Dodd, Michael S. Dukakis, Richard a. Gephardt, anne Wexler, Paul Kirk and many others, all of whom are Democrats, just not your grandfathers Democrats. This is the epicenter of the so-called progressive movement in america, along with a string of other well-connected progressive "think-tanks”.
If you are trying to figure out who is working towards a Socialist Global agenda at odds with american sovereignty and security, here's your answer, in undeniable terms. NDI is one of several well organized and funded groups of great political influence.
american voters must also acquaint themselves with The Trilateral Commission founded by David Rockefeller in 1973, whose current North american Chairman is Thomas S. Foley, former Democratic Speaker of the US House and former Chairman of the House Democratic Caucus and Democratic Study Group.
"The growing interdependence that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970's is deepening into globalization. The need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) remain the primary anchors of the wider international system, has not diminished but, if anything, intensified.” The North american Group of the Trilateral Commission includes a maximum of 87 U.S. members, 20 Canadian members and, since 2000, 13 Mexican members. a list of current members can be obtained from the North american office by e-mail.
Now, folks intrigued by international power brokering and secret societies are already familiar with some of these organizations. Conspiracy theorists willing to continue pulling the string can follow this ball of political yarn all the way back to the Bilderberg Group, and ultimately, all Rhodes (as in Rhodes Scholars) lead back to the Illuminati, of course. We have before us, a case where truth may indeed be stranger than fiction…and reality more spooky than an overactive imagination.
Collectively, these groups make up the One World agenda, which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established. Can it really be, or is it all just some crackpot conspiracy theory made up of misinterpreted coincidences and overstated affiliations? You decide…but research it yourself before you do.
Now I understand that it is completely out of bounds, politically incorrect with a capital PC, to refer to any american as a "socialist”. I know this, because I have written on this topic before and received the hate mail from voting Democrats who still hope to ignore the mountain of evidence stacking up against their precious JFK Party. But ask yourself, would JFK be any more welcome in today's DNC than Zell Miller, with his "ask not what your country can do for you” talk? NO! He would be forced into Independent status like Joe Lieberman today, and any honest american knows it.
So aside from all the international intrigue and spook talk, what does all of this mean to average americans who just elected a very anti-american Left into power?
In their words… not mine!
RESOLUTION ON THE OCCUPaTION OF IRaQ – "The prosecution of the War in Iraq and the subsequent occupation of Iraq completely validate the objections raised by those who opposed this war. Only the speedy restoration of Iraqi sovereignty to an independent and legitimate Iraqi government can end this quagmire.” (From Democratic Socialists of america)
Is this not the very platform used by the DNC to regain control of congress?
On The Rights of Undocumented Immigrants – "Legalizing the status of all immigrant workers and their families, as well as providing for a transparent and expeditious road to citizenship, embodies basic democratic socialist principles.” (From Democratic Socialists of america)
Is this not the position of Democrats who see all immigrants, legal and illegal, as only future federal aid recipients and therefore, reliable Democrat voters? What do you think Democrats mean when they say they want to revisit the House bill authorizing strict border security including a fence, or when they state that they want all immigrants (namely illegal immigrants) to be given full legal status, including voting rights? Why? and how do the american voters feel about this?
Ultimately, it doesn't matter how voters feel about any of these things. Democrats (like Republicans) have an agenda all their own and the 2006 mid-term election will be interpreted as a mandate, or blank check, for newly elected Democrats to pursue that agenda without opposition, because in their minds, the people gave them the gavel. Pelosi's attempt to run Murtha into power on a rail shows just how broadly she interprets her power. She thinks she was elected Commander-in-Chief, just watch.
according to pre-election polling data, most voters were angry with Bush & Co. for not efficiently finishing the job in Iraq, not effectively securing our borders and spending like a drunken Democrat. Yet these voters just leaped from the frying pan into the fire, by electing politicians eager to erase our borders entirely, legalize illegal immigrants, giving them full access to tax-payer funded social programs, public education and medicine, and even voting rights, while retreating in defeat from the war on terror in Iraq and working to outspend Bush in keeping with all the social promises they made in their quest to regain central power in Washington.
You elected whom? and are celebrating what? Tell me again how wise the average american voter is… Or does it depend on what the meaning of "is” is? americas most determined enemies are celebrating too and they don't care what the meaning of "is” is…
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2024 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement