WhatFinger


Yet the left, which claims to “support the working man,” is losing its mind over people having to work

Liberals lose their minds as Michigan passes law requiring Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours a month



Liberals lose their minds It’s not as if there are no jobs to be found. Employers are begging for workers. And Medicaid is supposed to be health insurance for the poor, not for the disabled, so working at least 80 hours a month can only improve your situation while giving the business sector access to the manpower that will make productivity possible. That’s why it passed both Michigan’s House and Senate easily, and Gov. Rick Snyder is getting ready to sign the bill:
Medicaid recipients would have to submit reports monthly about their compliance with the new rules, which also allow for the requirements to be met through school, vocational or job training, internships and community service. The requirement is waived for a recipient in substance abuse treatment. Other changes made in the original bill:
  • Making only the people in the Healthy Michigan program — the 680,000 of the 2.4 million people on the plan — subject to the work requirements.
  • Changing the age of people who must comply from 19-64 to 19-62.
  • Giving people a three-month grace period each year in case they are seasonal employees and, as Shirkey put it, “life happens.”
  • Having the bill take effect on Jan. 1, 2020, instead of 2019.
  • Maintaining a 48-month limit on benefits.
Among the people who would be exempt from the work requirements: pregnant women, people ages 19-20 who had been in the foster care system; disabled people and their caretakers; caretakers of a family member under the age of six; full-time students; the medically frail, and people who have been incarcerated within the last six months. The new work rules are expected to cost the state at least $17.5 million to administer because of the extra workers needed to verify the hours worked by the recipients and upgrades to computer systems. But, according to an analysis done by the House Fiscal Agency, it’s also expected to save between $7 million and $22 million because of lower numbers of Medicaid recipients.

Support Canada Free Press


This is a win for everyone except those who are determined to see the taxpayers fund continued dependence on the state. Are there people like that? Why, of course they are, and you know exactly who they are:
“This legislation is a twisted joke,” said Sen. Coleman Young II, D-Detroit. “Even with the changes made in the House, it’s still a turd, a shiny turd, but a turd nonetheless.” Sen. Rebekah Warren, D-Ann Arbor, said without including provisions for things like child care and transportation, “We’re setting (Medicaid recipients) up to fail.”
Democrats’ objections to work usually focus on things like child care and transportation. The argument is that poor people can’t afford cars and daycare, so it’s cruel to expect them to work. But if they don’t work, what chance do they ever have of no longer being poor? The Democrat way of looking at it keeps them dependent forever rather than ask them to deal with the same complications in life that all the rest of us deal with every day. The bill is very flexible in terms of how you can comply with the requirement, but you have to comply, and it’s good for you and everyone else if you do. A work requirement for welfare – and make no mistake, Medicaid is welfare – is such common sense that it’s hard to find opposition among the general public. Rabid left-wing activists hate it, of course, but almost no one opposes it if they’re not driven to by loyalty to their ideology. Yet it’s taken Michigan this long to pass it, and it’s happened in part because of incentives introduced by the Trump Administration. Here’s another reason this is important: The economy is poised for some of the fastest growth we’ve seen in years, but growth is productivity, and you can’t produce without people to do the work. The Obama Administration introduced a myriad of disincentives to work, and that’s one of the reasons we got the lowest workforce participation rate since the Carter Administration. Measures like this seek to turn that around, and the result will not only benefit the people doing the work but the economy as a whole. Yet the left, which claims to “support the working man,” is losing its mind over people having to work.

Recommended by Canada Free Press



View Comments

Dan Calabrese -- Bio and Archives

Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain

Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.


Sponsored