WhatFinger
CFPSubcribe

CONFLICT OF INTEREST - The Mueller Investigation is Wholly Unlawful


By —— Bio and Archives--December 10, 2017

American Politics, News, Opinion | Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

CONFLICT OF INTEREST - The Mueller Investigation is Wholly Unlawful
The Collusion Case against Donald Trump and Family has collapsed.

The Obstruction Case against Donald Trump and Family has just begun.

The Department of Justice, Department of State and some of the intel agencies are corrupt to the core.

Their spokesmen speak every day on CNN.

Collusion has morphed into “Obstruction.” Which, incidentally, can mean anything or whatever one’s eye sees or whatever one’s mind wishes to think. A thought in this case can be obstruction of justice for one. For example, the thought that crossed President Trump’s mind about Comey’s activities and lies - that he and his associates deliberately and cynically “fixed” the Clinton Matter - is now turning out to be a factual reality. It is alone, among many others, more than enough to get Comey fired.

The same team that conspired to obstruct justice in the Clinton Matter by not doing their job and acting as accomplices are now in charge of investigating the Trump Matter. They are in the process of pinning their own crimes on their target.

Meanwhile the unlawful acts of persons they conspired to absolve of crimes, they’ll tell us, is a nothingburger.”

As an officer of the court, especially if he’s in an investigative capacity, an attorney must disclose conflicts of interest. If he does not, and continues to proceed with an investigation, it is up to the law profession to investigate and possibly disbar him for not just crimes, but at least for being untrustworthy.

IT’S A MAD WORLD

  • Two Hillary Clinton aides lied to the FBI.
  • FBI: A nothingburger.
  • Hillary Clinton lied to Congress.
  • FBI: So what?
  • General Flynn lied to the FBI.
  • FBI: Coerce a guilty plea from Flynn with which to threaten Trump.

Daniel Greenfield writes:

“The FBI agent who was fired from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation team for sending anti-Donald Trump text messages conducted the interviews with two Hillary Clinton aides accused of giving false statements about what they knew of the former secretary of state’s private email server.

Neither of the Clinton associates, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, faced legal consequences for their misleading statements, which they made in interviews last year with former FBI section chief Peter Strzok

But another Strzok interview subject was not so lucky.

Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser, pleaded guilty last week to lying during an interview he gave on Jan. 24 to Strzok and another FBI agent.

Strzok was sending pro-Clinton and anti-Trump texts to the woman he was having an extramarital affair with. That woman worked for McCabe who had his own Clinton ties.

But undercutting those denials are email exchanges in which both Mills and Abedin either directly discussed or were involved in discussing Clinton’s server.

“hrc email coming back—is server okay?” Mills asked in a Feb. 27, 2010 email to Abedin and Justin Cooper, a longtime aide to Bill Clinton who helped set up the Clinton server.

“Ur funny. We are on the same server,” Cooper replied.

 

What we have here is that Hillary’s lawyer not only lied directly to the FBI, but she also acted as a witness for Hillary, and presumably lied on the witness stand. Because neither were sworn in, they have a free pass. The FBI under Comey, McCabe and Strozk—clearly all Democrat operatives as the particulars are exploding over some news wires—did not deem it necessary to depose Hillary, Huma and Cheryl under oath.

They deemed it necessary not to.

Incidentally, these same people have historically deposed under oath everyone else under investigation, as it is standard procedure, and the depositions were always recorded.

What we have here instead is that the FBI, in possession of Huma Abedin’s computer via her husband, Anthony Weiner, reportedly destroyed the evidence on it, and then FBI Director James Comey lied for Huma Abedin!

THE NATURE OF THE PROBLEM

When you lie to the FBI, you have a problem.

If you’re a Republican.

It you’re a Democrat, the Republicans have a problem.

If the FBI lies to the People, there is no problem.

The FBI agent taking notes and questioning Hillary with leading questions was none other than Hillary fan and benefactor Peter Strzok, second in charge of counterintelligence at the agency. Almost all of the Team Mueller members are cheerleaders for Hillary; almost all have donated to Democrats, some repeatedly; some up to $10,000; one has attended “Hillary’s victory party” November 8th 2016; and not a single one ever donated to Republicans. If you believe there’s collusion, cooperation and conspiracy ongoing here, you are not listening to CNN and MSNBC.

NATIONAL REVIEW:

“Here’s where the story gets downright bizarre. This agent, Peter Strzok, also worked with FBI director James Comey on the Clinton email investigation. In fact, he was so deeply involved in the Clinton investigation that he is said to have interviewed Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, and to have been present when the FBI interviewed Clinton.

According to CNN, he was part of the team responsible for altering the FBI’s conclusion that Clinton was “grossly negligent” in handling classified emails (a finding that could have triggered criminal liability) to “extremely careless”—a determination that allowed her to escape prosecution entirely.

After the Clinton investigation concluded, Strzok signed the documents opening the investigation into Russian election interference and actually helped interview former national-security adviser Michael Flynn.”

 

Continued below...

Incidentally, Strozk’s boss was Andrew McCabe, second in charge under FBI Director James Comey. For her campaign McCabe’s wife received $700,000 from the Clintons funneled through the governor of her state. Meanwhile the mainstream media conveniently redirected the story to the effect that McCabe’s wife did not receive the funds “directly” from Hillary, giving the impression that the story has no traction.

In the real world everything is so, except when it isn’t.

In fact the wife did receive the money directly from Hillary, or on her orders, for Hillary controlled the purse strings at the DNC. Ditto for the Foundation. The expenditure of $700,000 has to have gone across the desk of those in charge making large funding decisions. For example, the decision to to sabotage Bernie Sanders’ campaign.

What we see are the unintended consequences and aftermath of rot and corruption and conspiracy. Ask former DNC chair Donna Brazille.

Hillary controlled the purse - and the Democrat National Committee

.

James Comey’s brother received millions directly through his years-long association with the Clintons, as he not only works for the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes, but is a board member of HSBC Holdings that is a foundation partner. James Comey himself was neck deep in the Clinton’s affairs to the tune of receiving $6-8 million from deals he concluded for the Clintons.

Robert Mueller, James Comey’s partner, is about as dirty as they come. Arguably, a sinister man, even dirtier.

WASHINGTON POST - Brothers From Different Mothers:

“The two men’s working relationship can be traced back to at least December of 2003, when Comey joined Mueller in Washington after he became John Ashcroft’s deputy attorney general, according to a 2013 Washingtonian article about the two men’s long0standing relationship.

“He and Mueller spent many hours together, developing a close partnership—and watching together the disarray in the government over how to respond to the unfolding war on terror,” Washingtonian notes. “They shared a horror at the poor quality information infiltrating the upper reaches of government.”

The article goes on to point to personal similarities as well as professional. Both men were educated at Virginia universities—Mueller at the University of Virginia, Comey at William & Mary.

“Just years apart in the 1990s, they both gave up their top-tier private law firm jobs to return to the trenches of prosecuting criminals—Mueller as a junior prosecutor in Washington, DC, and Comey in Richmond, Virginia,” Washingtonian reports. “Both men were rising stars mentored and guided by Eric Holder in the 1990s during Holder’s time in the Justice Department under the Clinton administration.”...”

In other words, both Mueller and Comey are long-time Clintonistas and Obamistas.

 


Hillary Clinton’s closest aide and her lawyer blatantly lied to FBI

MEANWHILE FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS ROBERT MUELLER AND FBI AGENTS WHO WERE CONNECTED TO THE CLINTONS, EVEN IN MINOR ROLES, FROM PARTICIPATING IN AN INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY AND DONALD TRUMP.

It is incumbent and is required under law and in their contracts agents working on investigations sign to disclose conflicts of interest. Failing to observe these rules violate their oath of office, the public trust, justice itself, and their duty as officers of the court. These violations are grounds for disbarment and possibly prison time, and for certain would require a congressional investigation under the Organized Crime (RICO) Act. The many overlapping violations of Team Mueller are likely criminal.

CFR › Title 28 › Chapter I › Part 45 › Section 45.2

28 CFR 45.2 - Disqualification arising from personal or political relationship.

§ 45.2 Disqualification arising from personal or political relationship.

(a) Unless authorized under paragraph (b) of this section, no employee shall participate in a criminal investigation or prosecution if he has a personal or political relationship with:

(1) Any person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution; or

(2) Any person or organization which he knows has a specific and substantial interest that would be directly affected by the outcome of the investigation or prosecution.

(b) An employee assigned to or otherwise participating in a criminal investigation or prosecution who believes that his participation may be prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section shall report the matter and all attendant facts and circumstances to his supervisor at the level of section chief or the equivalent or higher. If the supervisor determines that a personal or political relationship exists between the employee and a person or organization described in paragraph (a) of this section, he shall relieve the employee from participation unless he determines further, in writing, after full consideration of all the facts and circumstances, that:

(1) The relationship will not have the effect of rendering the employee’s service less than fully impartial and professional; and

(2) The employee’s participation would not create an appearance of a conflict of interest likely to affect the public perception of the integrity of the investigation or prosecution.

(c) For the purposes of this section:

(1)Political relationship means a close identification with an elected official, a candidate (whether or not successful) for elective, public office, a political party, or a campaign organization, arising from service as a principal adviser thereto or a principal official thereof; and

(2)Personal relationship means a close and substantial connection of the type normally viewed as likely to induce partiality. An employee is presumed to have a personal relationship with his father, mother, brother, sister, child and spouse. Whether relationships (including friendships) of an employee to other persons or organizations are “personal” must be judged on an individual basis with due regard given to the subjective opinion of the employee.

(d) This section pertains to agency management and is not intended to create rights enforceable by private individuals or organizations.

[Order No. 993-83, 48 FR 2319, Jan. 19, 1983. Redesignated at 61 FR 59815, Nov. 25, 1996]

I rest my case.


FURTHER READING BY AUTHOR:

GENERAL FLYNN, MUELLER & The Fruit of the Poisoned Tree

THE SWAMP CREATURE’S RAILROADING OF DONALD TRUMP

The Obama Uranium-1 Story even FOX News Won’t Speak About!


Please SHARE this story as the only way for CFP to beat Facebook anti-Conservative Suppression.

Only YOU can save CFP from Social Media Suppression. Tweet, Post, Forward, Subscribe or Bookmark us

Andrew G. Benjamin -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Andrew G. Benjamin is a real estate and tax specialist, equities trader, a former economic advisor to New York city mayor Rudy Giuliani; serving on the transition team’s Subcommittee on Taxation, Finance and the Budget. Benjamin also wrote extensively about intelligence, economic issues, the Mideast, terrorism, technology, high end audio and transnational politics.


Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: