WhatFinger


One person alone could not guarantee a foreign nation or agent beneficial legislation without the help of others within the government

Foreign collusion: What is the evidence and what does the evidence indicate?



Foreign collusion: What is the evidence and what does the evidence indicate?Regardless of how tiresome and worn out the Russia hoax has become, Democrats and the media are now claiming that the information contained on Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation. The only Russian disinformation, that has been proven to be Russian disinformation, came from the Democrats, and that was the infamous Steele dossier, that the FBI used to spy on President Trump's 2016 campaign as well as his presidency. By the way, Leslie Stahl, the surveillance warrants issued for members of President Trump's campaign team are proof that President Trump was spied on by the FBI during the 2016 campaign. The spy warrants were even renewed after the President took office, and that's proof that he was spied on after he took office.

All the evidence of foreign collusion points to Democrats as the culprits

Moreover, all the evidence of foreign collusion, as well as using one's government position to profit personally, points to Democrats as the culprits. So what is the evidence, and what does the evidence indicate? To begin with, prior to the Uranium One deal with Russia, Bill Clinton was paid a $500,000 speakers fee by a Russian bank. According to an article in the Daily Mail, "the money to Bill Clinton was seen as evidence Russia had unleashed an influence campaign designed in getting access to Hillary." The article went on to say, "FBI agents were surprised by the timing and size, the Hill wrote, of Bill Clinton's half-million dollar speech, which has raised conflict-of-interest questions about Hillary Clinton, as the transaction occurred around the same time she was being asked to sign off on a uranium deal, which gave Russia 20 percent of the U.S.'s (uranium) deposits." Furthermore, Hillary is not the only Democrat implicated. In January of this year, Breitbart reported: "A firm employing James Biden, the younger brother of former Vice President Joe Biden, received more than $1.5 billion in government-backed contracts during the Obama administration." According to Real Clear Politics, the CEO of Hillstone International had "a meeting in the White House on November 4th, 2010, the only time the CEO of this company ever visited the White House, went to Joe Biden's office, literally three weeks later, James Biden was appointed vice president of that company, and then about three to six months later, they get this contract to build 100,000 homes in Iraq."

Support Canada Free Press


Biden could not have withheld aid to Ukraine without Obama and Democrat leaders backing him

The New York Post described the Hillstone deal like this: " A group of minority partners, including James Biden, stood to split about $735 million. There’s plenty of money for everyone if this project goes through, said one company official." Most everybody noted that James Biden had absolutely no experience in construction. Then, after Obama made Joe Biden his point man in Ukraine, a Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings, installed Hunter Biden as a board member and gave him a lucrative salary, although Hunter had no experience in the energy business. Moreover, we know, by Biden's own admission that, in March 2016, he told the leaders of Ukraine, Poroshenko and Yatsenjuk, that unless they fired Viktor Shokin, the prosecutor investigating Burisma Holdings, they were not going to get $1 billion dollars in U.S. aid. Biden bragged about it at a meeting of the Council on Foreign Relations, and he even implicated Obama was involved. Furthermore, according to U.S. code, (under 2 USC Section 684 and 2 USC Section 683), the president has the power to propose either deferring or rescinding funds to Congress. That means it would have required Obama and congresses cooperation to rescind the funds. Conclusion: Biden could not have withheld aid to Ukraine without Obama and Democrat leaders backing him. We also know from Viktor Shokin's testimony that he was investigating reports of corruption at Burisma when he was forced to resign due to pressure from the Obama administration's point man, Joe Biden.

Hunter received money from the Communist Chinese government

In addition, there's the $3.5 million payoff to Hunter Biden by a Russian Oligarch. According to the headline in the Daily Mail, "Hunter Biden was paid $3.5 million by Russian oligarch - when Joe was VP - to open doors for her construction business in America, her brother claims." And, according to the New York Post, "in 2013, Hunter landed in Beijing aboard Air Force Two, accompanying his father on an official visit to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter’s company, Rosemont Seneca, became a partner in a new investment company backed by the state-owned Bank of China." In addition to receiving money from a Russian oligarch connected to Putin, Hunter received money from the Communist Chinese government. The article goes on to say, "In 2015, a state-backed real estate conglomerate acquired a controlling stake in Rosemont Realty, a sister company of Rosemont Seneca where Hunter served as an advisor. As part of the deal, the Chinese promised $3 billion for commercial office property acquisitions in the US — a major windfall for the company." And, according to Peter Schweizer and Jacob Mcleod, "in May 2017, he (Hunter Biden) met with Ye Jianming, chairman of Chinese energy company CEFC, to discuss investment opportunities in the US. After the meeting, Ye sent a 2.8-carat diamond to Hunter along with a “thank you” card. When, six months later, a CEFC (China Energy) executive was arrested in New York on unrelated bribery charges, his first phone call was to Hunter’s uncle, James Biden.” Obviously, the Chinese executive knew James Biden as a contact.


The evidence also indicates that Democrats were abusing their power during the Obama administration

Moreover, Fox News recently uncovered an email from Jim Biden to Hunter Biden, Tony Bobulinski, Rob Walker and James Gilliar that contained a list of contacts for a joint venture involving the Bidens and CEFC (China Energy). The list of contacts included Democrats Kamala Harris, Chuck Schumer, Amy Klobuchar, Dianne Feinstein, Kirsten Gillibrand, Andrew Cuomo, Bill de Blasio, Terry McCauliffe, and others. All of the evidence, that I can find, indicates that Joe Biden and other Democrats were colluding with the Communist Chinese government and other foreign agents for personal gain. Diane Feinstein even had a Chinese government spy on her staff for years. The evidence also indicates that Democrats were abusing their power during the Obama administration. Furthermore, taking money from foreign agents for favorable or beneficial legislation is bribery (corruption), and depending on the circumstances, it could also be considered treason. Finally, one person alone could not guarantee a foreign nation or agent beneficial legislation without the help of others within the government. One person alone could not withhold foreign aid or guarantee beneficial legislation to foreign nations and their agents. A majority of legislators as well as the executive branch would have to be in on the deal. In reality, it would take the majority of a political party as well as the chief executive to guarantee beneficial legislation to a foreign nation or corporation, and that is considered treason.

View Comments

Charles Wills -- Bio and Archives

Charles Wills is a retired Engineer.
Since retirement, he has devoted much of his free time to reading and researching
world and biblical history. He enjoys reading and collecting old books, especially
textbooks published before the turn of the 20th century, as well as writing about the
wealth of information hidden in them.


Sponsored