ConsumerFreedom.com
June 14, 2004
What do basketball stars Kobe Bryant, Karl Malone, and Ben Wallace all have in common? Pound for pound they're some of the best players in the NBa -- but they aren't considered fit by obesity scaremongers. The U.S. government actually considers them "overweight." Lakers superstar Shaquille O'Neal is officially "obese." In fact, by the federal government's standard, 75 percent of the players in the NBa Finals are classified as either overweight or obese. Find out if you're "overweight" like Kobe Bryant with our body-mass index calculator.
Why does the government think these top athletes need to lose weight? Because current government standards make no distinction between muscle and fat. and in 1998, the U.S. government changed the cutoff for overweight. as a result, more than 30 million americans (including Bryant and Wallace) were shifted from a government-approved weight to the overweight category -- without gaining an ounce.
The same standard that misclassifies Lakers and Pistons as too heavy is behind the continuous flow of alarmist headlines touting the horrors of the growing "obesity epidemic." It serves to create an artificial "crisis" (or epidemic) that requires Draconian policy shifts. The self-described "food police" at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, trial lawyers led by John "Sue the Bastards" Banzhaf, and government bureaucrats all love to take advantage of misleading statistics about the number of overweight americans to advance their agenda of "fat taxes" and obesity lawsuits.
The Center for Consumer Freedom is a nonprofit coalition supported by restaurants, food companies, and consumers working together to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.
Unlike the anti-consumer activists we monitor and keep in check, we stand up for common sense and personal choice. The growing fraternity of "food cops," health care enforcers, militant activists, meddling bureaucrats, and violent radicals who think they know "what's best for you" are pushing against our basic freedoms. We're here to push back.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2024 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement