Canada Free Press -- ARCHIVES

Because without America, there is no free world.

Return to Canada Free Press

Stanley "Tookie" Williams, Death penalty

Terminating Tookie

By William John Hagan
Wednesday, December 14, 2005

The recent execution of Stanley "Tookie" Williams in California serves as a perfect case study for when the death penalty is acceptable, even under the stringent standards of the Catholic Church. In almost no circumstance will the Vatican find the death penalty acceptable, however, there is an exception: The circumstances of the life and crimes of Stanley Williams is one of them.

The Church’s current teachings on the Death Penalty and its use stem from Pope John Paul II’s 1995 encyclical "Evangelium Vitae". In this papal letter addressed to the church’s hierarchy, Pope Paul wrote that a government may only execute an individual "in cases of absolute necessity, in other words, when it would not be possible otherwise to defend society. Today, however, as a result of steady improvement in the organization of the penal system, such cases are very rare, if not practically nonexistent." Tookie Williams however, despite the hollow propaganda of the left, is just such a case. Violent gang member, Williams, posed a continuing danger to society both in and out of the California correctional system. This was an execution even the Pope could endorse.

The mainstream media has ignored the realities of the Williams’ case in order to promote an anti-death penalty agenda. To present this mass murderer as a martyr is an insult to victims everywhere. True, the left has made a valiant attempt at misleading most people into thinking of the reborn Williams as a benign "children’s book author" who was nominated for the Nobel prize but the reality is a far cry from this pretty picture. Yes, he did write a couple of books and, along with such luminaries as Hitler and Stalin, was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. None of this, however, excuses his unrepentant crimes for which he was originally placed in prison, nor does it prove that he was no longer a threat to society even from his cloistered location behind steel bars. In fact, as the founder of the Crips, "Tookie" Williams had the power to order the murder of anyone he desired and many lived in fear that he would. In fact, "Tookie" is his original gang name, a moniker that many observers, including this author, couldn’t help but notice that Williams’ failed to renounce.

So feared was Tookie Williams from behind bars that the majority of the relatives of Williams’ victims were afraid to even speak to the media about the clemency issue which confronted Governor arnold Schwarzenegger. Those watching either the FOX or CNN news networks would have noticed that, among the numerous guests arguing for or against the execution of Williams, nowhere to be found were the relatives of Yen-I Yang, Tsai-Shai Yang or Yee-Chin Lin, whom Williams executed in cold blood. Their absence highlighted the justifiable fear of retaliation from the Crips, the notorious gang that Williams founded that is responsible for the murders of thousands of individuals. How did the Crips get their name? Founding member, Williams’, mandated that you had to cripple a person in order to qualify for membership. This is a man who is beyond redemption.

Only the very brave Lora Owens, mother of Williams’ victim albert Owens, appeared regularly on television in a successful appeal in favor of Williams’ execution. albert Owens was murdered by Tookie Williams when he robbed the convenience store where albert was employed. Rather than just being satisfied with the stolen money, Williams forced Owens to the floor and executed him. Williams further entertained himself by cracking jokes about the noises the dying Owens made after being shot in the back. By any standard, Tookie Williams can be defined as a serial killer and there is no doubt that he killed many more people then those for whom he was convicted.

Once in prison, Williams remained a danger to society despite the claims of his left-wing supporters. The following are just a few examples of Tookie Williams conduct once behind bars, taken directly from a report prepared by Los angeles District attorney's office regarding the subject of Williams’ bid for clemency:

  • On June 30, 1981, just two months after being sentenced, Williams was involved in a violent fight with another inmate. Williams was observed kneeling over the other inmate and striking him in the head with his closed fists. When Williams was ordered to cease fighting, he ignored the order. Only after repeated orders to stop, did Williams stop his violence. (P. Exh. 6).

  • On January 26, 1982, Williams was ordered to line up for his return to his cell. Williams refused the order and became hostile. The guard then explained the line-up procedure to Williams. Williams responded by saying "you'll get yours boy, I can do anything now because I know what the gunmen will do…one of these days I'll trick you boy." (P. Exh. 7).

  • On January 28, 1982, Williams had two separate instances where he threw chemical substances at guards. In one of these instances, Williams threw a chemical substance in the eyes and on the face of a guard. as a result of that assault, the guard suffered from chemical burns to these areas and had to be taken to the hospital where he received emergency care. (P. Exh. 8).

  • On January 29, 1982, Williams again attacked a guard by throwing a chemical substance on him. (P. Exh. 9).

  • On February 16, 1984, a guard saw Williams bending over another inmate and striking him with his closed fists. In an effort to stop the attack, the guard blew his whistle and drew his weapon. Williams, however, continued to fight. Only after a guard fired a warning shot, did Williams stop fighting. (P. Exh. 10).

  • On June 8, 1984, Williams was observed participating in inappropriate behavior with a female visitor. When the guard advised the female of the prison policies, Williams became verbally hostile and stated, "you are looking around too much and that's not your job. I have dusted many officers on the street, one more would not make any difference." (P. Exh. 11).

  • On July 4, 1986, Williams stepped between a guard and another inmate and began to beat up the inmate. The guard ordered Williams to stop but Williams continued with the assault. Eventually, after gun officers responded, Williams stopped the attack. (P. Exh. 12).

  • On October 10, 1988, Williams was involved in a fight that led to him being stabbed. Prison officials subsequently learned that this stabbing was done in retaliation for a September 22, 1988, stabbing of another inmate ordered by Crips leader Stanley Williams. (P. Exh. 13).

  • On October 19, 1988, Williams was placed in administrative Segregation based on his association with the Crips street gang. (P. Exh. 13).

  • On December 24, 1991, Williams was involved in another fight with an inmate. Once again, despite being ordered to stop, Williams continued with the assault. Eventually, gun officers responded by firing a round near Williams. after the shot was fired, guards gained control over Williams. (P. Exh. 14).

  • On July 6, 1993, a large fight broke out in the shower area. Williams was one of the combatants. a guard ordered the inmates to stop, but the fight continued. after a warning shot was fired, the fighting stopped. Subsequently, a stabbing instrument ("shank") made of sharpened plastic was recovered from where the fight had occurred. (P. Exh. 15).

Finally, this report fails to mention Williams’ failed escape attempt. "Tookie" had planned to blow up a vehicle transporting him to court, killing his guards. His plot was uncovered and Williams failed to escape. Time and again, Mr. Williams had demonstrated that in prison, despite his incarceration, it was not possible to defend society from his criminal tendencies. Even from behind bars this sociopath was a menace to any innocent person who came into his orbit: Unless, of course, you were a gullible liberal there to help him plead for his life and tout his "amazing accomplishments". "Tookie was a defiant, anti-social menace to the end. Refusing to denounce his gang membership, repent or apologize for the killing of 4 innocent people; even snubbing the prison’s offer of a last meal and spiritual advisor.

. The time has come for society to abandon any sympathy it may feel for the treacherous "Tookie" and his appalling legacy, and embrace the thousands of people who have died as a direct and indirect result of his life’s work.

a much higher power will now serve as Williams’ final arbitrator and, as a result, society has finally, and righteously, been protected by the courageous actions of Governor Schwarzenegger.

William John Hagan is a columnist for the Canada Free Press. His work has appeared in the Providence Journal, the Houston Home Journal, Freedom Today Magazine (UK), and World Net Daily. He can be reached at: William_Hagan@excite.com.



Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2024 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement